Judicial Watch Comes of Age as an Organization Defending The Rule of Law in America
In its brief 15-year history, Judicial Watch has proven itself a player we should look to, as it fights to uphold the rule of law in the United States.
PINE BLUFFS ΜΆ I first became aware of Judicial Watch as a player in 1994, when I began researching for my first book. That novel, which was eventually published (See The China Connection (Writers Club Press, New York, Lincoln, Shanghai, 2003), is a fact-based fictionalized account of efforts by the Chinese to obtain duel use missile technology from the United States through illegal contributions to the re-election campaigns of President William Jefferson Clinton and Vice-President Al Gore.
During the ‘90s I did not think anyone really cared about what the Chinese were doing. The federal government was pursuing a “policy of engagement” with that huge Asian nation, and, other than a few nationally-know reporters such as Bill Gertz of The Washington Times, the nation seemed to simply wink at any of its transgressions, including its civilian and military espionage activities directed against America’s public and private sectors.
Imagine my surprise, then, when I discovered that led by its founder, attorney Larry Klayman (who left Judicial Watch in 2003 to run for the U.S. Senate from Florida), Judicial Watch had systematically prepared and filed eighteen lawsuits against the administration of Democrat President Bill Clinton and figures in his administration, alleging corruption, and violations of the law.
Judicial Watch’s motto is “because no one is above the law,” a concept in which I and lawyers of my generation were steeped from the first days of law school. The group describes itself as a conservative, non-partisan educational foundation that promotes transparency, accountability, and integrity in government, politics, and the law. Its mission statement states that it advocates high standards of ethics and morality in America’s public life, and that it seeks to ensure that political and judicial officers do not abuse the powers entrusted to them by the American people. Its work is accomplished through filing lawsuits with federal courts and complaints with various federal commissions.
For fifteen years, this organization has been defending, with increasing success, the proposition that “no one is above the law.” It is proudly conservative, but not partisan. It firmly believes that the rule of law should be respected by all Americans, especially those who hold high public office.
In its early years, the organization received considerable financial support from conservative billionaire Richard Mellon Scaife. Because of this, true to the form we’d see repeated over and over, Clinton administration officials charged that it was “abusing the judicial system for partisan ends.” But as proof of its non-partisanship, Judicial Watch joined with the liberal Sierra Club in filing suit against the administration of George W. Bush and Vice-President Richard Cheney for the release of Cheney’s energy task force minutes.
Liked it


-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Post CommentDonna
On August 29, 2009 at 4:23 pm
Thank you for this outstanding, well-written, well-researched article. I look forward to more articles from this writer.
Bob Winkler
On August 31, 2009 at 3:58 pm
I’ve heard of Judicial Watch but was not sure exactly what it did or what its philosophy was. Thank you for this overview. I’ll be watching Judicial Watch’s cases a little more closely in the future..
Lisa Basarab
On September 1, 2009 at 11:46 am
Thank you for this informative article. It makes me more appreciative of Judicial Watch’s efforts and is a cautionary tale about the corruption of power. God help us!
Anthony Joseph Sacco
On September 5, 2009 at 1:38 pm
Probably should have mentioned that you can keep track of what Judicial Watch is doing or contribute to its efforts to defend the Rule of Law in America, by going to its website at http://www.JudicialWatch.org. To send them an e-mail, go to info@judicialwatch.org.
Richard J. Wall, Jr.
On September 7, 2009 at 3:37 pm
Thank you, Mr. Sacco, for alerting the public to the importance of Judicial Watch!
Wm S McQuay
On September 9, 2009 at 9:11 pm
Judicial Watch appears to have the right idea. What can be done to make this group more successful? The law does apply to all or we have wasted Congress’s time since they first convened in the 1700’s.
Carla Dahle McQuay
On September 9, 2009 at 9:30 pm
Mr. Sacco has written a concise and totally understandable article about Judicial Watch and its importance to all Americans. It is unfortunate that Judicial Watch does not apply to many people in power.