Lebanon: Why Is It Important To U.S. Interests?
Lebanon, one of the few Democracies in the Middle East, has experienced unrest for perhaps 50 years, as dissident social and cultural groups within the country refuse to assimilate.
Lebanon, one of the few democracies and among the smallest countries in the Middle East, lies on the eastern shore of the Mediterranean Sea. Bounded by much-larger Syria on the east and Israel to the south, it has experienced internal unrest for perhaps fifty years, as dissident social and cultural groups within the country ? Islamic Muslims and Maronite Christians being the largest factions, although the terrorist organization Hezbollah has also made its presence felt ? have refused to assimilate, and continue to vie for power. No strong man of the stature of a dictatorial Joseph Broz Tito in Yugoslavia has ever emerged to control them. That’s not a bad thing, because although dictators can and do control internal warring factions, they often suppress civil liberties in the process.
LATEST CRISIS
The latest crisis was precipitated by the assassination of well-liked Industry Minister Pierre Gemayal, 34, a member of the Phalange Party, shortly after he called upon Syria to withdraw its occupation troops from Lebanese territory and cease meddling in its affairs. His was the most recent in a string of political killings: former Prime Minister Rafik Hariri in February 2005, anti-Syrian journalist Samir Kassir in June 2005, ex-Communist leader George Hawi in June 2005, and anti-Syrian Member of Parliament Gebran Teuni in December of that year. Since Gemayal’s death occurred shortly after his request for an end to Syrian influence, naturally that country is suspected of having had a hand in it. The Beirut government’s call for an international tribunal to investigate Syria’s possible role in Lebanon’s cycle of political murders has been seconded by President Bush, who has asked for “a full investigation to identify those people and forces behind the killings.” In characteristically slow fashion, the UN Security Council approved plans in December 2006 for a special international tribunal to try those accused of killing Hariri in February 2005. Although coming twenty-two months after the fact, this should please the Europeans, who strongly believe that they can talk their enemies to death instead of taking action.
HEZBOLLAH FURTHER COMPLICATES MATTERS
The situation has been further complicated by the terrorist organization Hezbollah, which has inserted itself into the southern reaches of this tiny nation, between Beirut and its common border with Israel. Attempting to appease Hezbollah ? shades of Neville Chamberlain’s handling of Adolph Hitler’s National Socialist (NAZI) Party in 1938 ? the government permitted candidates from that group to stand for Parliament; akin to letting the fox into the henhouse. Several were elected. Together, pro-Syrian and Hezbollah factions in Parliament have been able to exert enough influence to keep Lebanon’s fledgling army from marching to dislodge the much more heavily armed Hezbollah interlopers. The take-over of Lebanese ground by Hezbollah’s militia ? a sort of nation within a nation endeavor ? from which it launched frequent rocket attacks against Israel, was what prompted Israel to cross Lebanon’s border to attack Hezbollah. That move was only partially successful.
RESIGNATIONS AND DEMONSTRATIONS
To complicate matters further, after Gemayal’s death, Hezbollah and pro-Syrian members of Parliament resigned, seeking to bring about yet another crisis for the elected Lebanese government. For the past two weeks, with the aid of some ill-informed citizens, Hezbollah has staged massive street demonstrations to force the government to resign. This is reminiscent of the Communist tactic in the United States back in the 1030s and 1940s, after they successfully infiltrated and took control of the Labor Movement.
THE FUTURE
Today, three stark scenarios face the government of Prime Minister Fouad Siniora: civil war between pro-Syrian Hezbollah followers and the rest of the country, a coup d’etat which would place Hezbollah in power with Syrian backing, or the current government successfully moving to overcome Hezbollah. For the latter to happen, Lebanon’s outgunned army will need to be bolstered with more modern weapons and possibly advisers from America. That move would almost certainly be opposed by Democrats here. But if the Lebanese people’s efforts to defend their democracy against Syrian and Iranian attempts to foment instability and violence are to succeed, it’s worth the effort. And it needs to be done soon.
Liked it


-
-
Post CommentJodi
On November 6, 2007 at 7:47 am
Do you think that arming the Lebanese army is the best course of action? Based on your arguement, you said that Lebanon is a democracy where the Hezbollah have been able to get elected. So, wouldn’t arming the army just be giving more weapons to Hezbollah?
Anthony Joseph Sacco
On January 4, 2008 at 9:04 am
This response is meant for Jodi, who commented on November 6, but I don’t know how to reach her any other way than here.
Jodi, in my article I describe how elected Hezbollah members of the Lebanese Parliament have all resigned from Parliament, hoping to precipitate a crisis that would destroy the government. It did not.
Also, following the situation over there closely, you saw that after we sent modern arms to the Lebanese government, its military launched an operation against Hezbollah forces holed up in a large refugee camp, which they’d taken over and were using to strike Israel and other parts of Lebanon. Hezbollah was forced to abandon the Camp. It’s no longer a santuary for them.
That, together with Israel’s partially successful strike against them in southern Lebanon has, temporarily at least, reduced Hezbollah to impotence.
Thanks for your comment.