You are here: Home » Politics » Minarets? No Thanks!

Minarets? No Thanks!

Voters have prohibited the building of further minarets in Switzerland. After many reactions that have been published all over the world, it is now time to look at the decision from the unpleasant angle of truth. After the rabid Muslim denunciators, the incompetent politicians’ views, and the plain stupid and illiterate ravings, let’s have a look at what really happened that weekend.

 

Some uneducated commentators called the voters’ verdict racist. If buildings have a race, then I am treated to racism in Britain, as the British are unable to build houses with windows that fit, I suppose. It’s a poor Faith that has to define itself in buildings, I prefer people who have a true belief in God (or Allah) without the necessity to resort to props and crutches.

 

The verdict was called a slap in the face of moderate Muslims. Yes, it was just that, as so far they have failed miserably on every account. They have failed to distance themselves from Muslim regimes, from Theocratic ideologies, from terrorism, and from rabid fanatics. So far, they have not managed to get rid of all the preachers who think that Islam is something special, so special in fact that it is the leading religion in the world. (Some other religions might want to take heed of that as well, they are no better, but under the label of political correctness I will bow to the loss of freedom of speech we all suffered and not name them.) Instead of snivelling and whining, moderate Muslims should start to clean out the dirt bags from their mosques; no law is meant to last forever.

 

Another Muslim who helped to promote the prohibition of minarets in Switzerland was the dim Prime Minister of Turkey who called minarets the ‘bayonets of Islam’ just prior to the vote. What would be forgivable to an uneducated peasant from the mountains behind Konya is an affront to any thinking person in the world. And isn’t it sad that after hundreds of years, people still confuse faith with religion and have to use military jargon to propagate their negative views?

 

Of major interest would be the question: Was the decision fascist? As fascism is a relative term, we’ll have to wait to discuss the issue until a second country in the world manages to institute a democracy. So far, there is no way to compare the development on a relevant basis. And to compare it to any development in the monarchies, plutocracies, oligarchies, and theocracies currently in use in the UN member states would be like comparing apples to pears.

 

What it all boils down to is that Islam is not part of Swiss culture and won’t be until Muslims prove that they have something to add to Swiss tradition that is worthwhile fighting for. It shows that any kind of fanatics cause enormous harm to any cause they embrace (or should the word be stifle?). And it definitely shows that it is high time to discuss the problem in Europe, instead of wiping it under the carpet as the governments of the European Union have done so far under the euphemism of political correctness.

8
Liked it
User Comments
  1. drelayaraja

    On December 10, 2009 at 4:00 am


    Good article..

  2. Authoress Terry E. Lyle

    On December 10, 2009 at 5:59 am


    Interesting article. Thanks

  3. simplyoj

    On December 10, 2009 at 6:26 am


    thanks for tacking this kind of subject.

  4. lonewolf13

    On December 10, 2009 at 3:36 pm


    Thanks for sharing your views

  5. diamondpoet

    On December 10, 2009 at 4:16 pm


    Good article thanks for sharing.

  6. jamie mullen

    On December 10, 2009 at 9:46 pm


    \” The word democracy translates to power of the people, and it means that the people have the last say on any issue concerning the country, its laws, and its interests. It also means that the people are always right,\”

    No, actually it does not. Just because the majority thinks something is true does not make it morally or even factually correct.
    Even people who truly love democracy have to admit it has it\’s flaws. I would say this is a prime example of one of those flaws namely the ability of the voting population to be swayed by emotion rather than rational thinking.

    \”A general misstatement all over the media is that this vote was a verdict against a minority, stating that Muslims represent five percent of the population. But Muslims make up 11 percent of the population, and they are the third largest religious group in the land, behind the people who do not belong to any religious group and the Christians.\”

    I\’m pretty sure 11 percent is still a minority, way to do math.

    \”Some uneducated commentators called the voters’ verdict racist. If buildings have a race, then I am treated to racism in Britain, as the British are unable to build houses with windows that fit, I suppose. It’s a poor Faith that has to define itself in buildings, I prefer people who have a true belief in God (or Allah) without the necessity to resort to props and crutches.\”

    By this logic vandalizing synagogue\’s is not anti-semitic, in fact if jewish people are offended by smashed windows and spray painted swastikas it\’s just a sign of there crass materialism.

  7. Lucas Dié

    On December 11, 2009 at 2:37 am


    @jamie mullen: I am glad that at least somebody is of the opinion that Brecht got it right and governments should get rid of their people; I agree with your math, and as there are 30 percent non-religious and 24 percent Christians, that’s two further minorities – your math also means that any decision taken by a majority may be contested in court as suppression of a minority; as to logic: Is not building identical to destroying? And where on your map is the tribal home of Islamists who probably once spoke Islamese?

  8. Leonardo da Vinci E.

    On December 15, 2009 at 3:54 pm


    Democracy has spoken if that is the kind of government intended, but I prefer a Republic which merely uses elements of Democracy as a means of different people coming to a decision, but absolutely believes that all its citizens have specific Human Rights which are not subject to anyones Democratic vote ( And what would be a tyranny of the people if done otherwise).

  9. Lucas Dié

    On December 16, 2009 at 10:41 am


    @Leonardo: I agree, a Republic is a good choice, especially if you manage to maneuver your family into the correct position. But it took the Romans several centuries to get all the wrinkles out of the system and make it manageable. The Russians on the other hand seem to take the shortcut with Putin’s Julius playing to Medvedev’s Octavian, whereas the US are still stuck in the Oligarchic phase all Republics fall into … But good luck!

Post Comment
Powered by Powered by Triond