<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Electoral College Exposed: How the Presidential Election Really Works</title>
	<atom:link href="http://socyberty.com/politics/the-electoral-college-exposed-how-the-presidential-election-really-works/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://socyberty.com/politics/the-electoral-college-exposed-how-the-presidential-election-really-works/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2012 15:07:34 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sparky112</title>
		<link>http://socyberty.com/politics/the-electoral-college-exposed-how-the-presidential-election-really-works/comment-page-1/#comment-73613</link>
		<dc:creator>Sparky112</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 21:09:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socyberty.com/politics/the-electoral-college-exposed-how-the-presidential-election-really-works/#comment-73613</guid>
		<description>You should mention in here that there are two states which *can* split their electoral votes - Maine and Nebraska. It hasn&#039;t ever happened, but it is possible. Even though it still favors the overall winner of the state, it&#039;s a little bit of a better system, in my opinion, because it allows a person&#039;s vote to be important even if they are in a state which is overwhelmingly of the party opposite their own. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You should mention in here that there are two states which *can* split their electoral votes &#8211; Maine and Nebraska. It hasn&#8217;t ever happened, but it is possible. Even though it still favors the overall winner of the state, it&#8217;s a little bit of a better system, in my opinion, because it allows a person&#8217;s vote to be important even if they are in a state which is overwhelmingly of the party opposite their own.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

