Was Jesus a Socialist
This is a comparison of Jesus to the Socialist mantra.
There is a significant difference between Socialism and Christ and it can be summed up in two sentences from Jesus and the socialist writings..
Jesus said, “Give to the poor.”
The socialist says, “We tax you so we can give it to the poor.”
The one is voluntary giving, the laying down ones life (in the form of labor and money). The other is being taxed – that is the money is forcefully taken. I am sure that some will argue this is not forcefully taken but look at what happens if the tax is not paid. It will eventually come to it being taken by force. The tax man will come, then the police (in some form) will come. Either the money or liberty will be forfeited. It is taken forcibly. It is just done nicer than the mob protection rackets.
Jesus said, “Give to the poor.” This act is one that benefits the giver and the recipient. The giver does it out of love and duty. The recipient gets something that is handed to him by a willing giver. That attitude does wonders for both.
The socialist says, “We tax you so we can give it to the poor.” The taking of taxes certainly is taking money in a way that the “giver” is generally not a willing participant. When we really look at it, that money is taken at the point of a gun. In the spirit this taints the money no matter where it is disbursed and the money never yields the result intended. The forcible taking places the person giving the money as not being blessed for giving because the money is not willingly given. I believe if we willingly give money that goes to taxes that are used to help the poor we have a reward for that just the same as if we gave it privately. And if the person gives the taxes grudgingly there is no reward for it. On the other hand, the way the money is disbursed is degrading to the recipient. They are actually encouraged to lie to get what they need because by lying they get more. The system is one that steals from the one taxed and the recipient. It steals money and reward from the taxed and the respect, dignity and at times the honesty and integrity from the recipient.
Jesus never did anything that degraded or stole….
Socialists do it routinely.
Anyone who compares the two as being alike is either a fool or a liar – depending on whether he or she knows the truth or not.
But then, people who could be listed as believing this include Reverend Jeremiah Wright, Barak Obama, Michelle Obama and Joe the Slow Biden who thinks paying taxes is patriotic for others, not him.
Other Articles by Ralph Brandt
Churches That Get Government Money
Financial Help in These Trying Times
Anonymous and Irresponsible: the Radical Left
The Comparison of the Assassinations of Kennedy and Lincoln
Relationship of Church and State
I’m Going on Apr 29, 2007 0 $0.00 41 $0.08 0 0
Compromise in the Church Apr 28, 2007 0 $0.00 42 $0.09 0 0
Come Away My Beloved Apr 28, 2007 1 $0.00 55 $0.12 0 0
Communion Apr 28, 2007 0 $0.00 17 $0.02 0 0
Liked it


-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Post Commentpatrick
On March 2, 2008 at 12:53 am
i am a Christian. i feel it is a duty to pay
taxes to support society, and these monies should
be used to help the less fortunate. if i feel it
is a duty to pay taxes to help the less fortunate, can
i claim Jesus is a socialist, or do you have
what He is locked up ?
matthew 16: 19-21
Ralph Brandt
On April 1, 2008 at 4:32 pm
Socialists take money to give to the poor, aka Robin Hood. It is theft by government. Jesus said, give… It is voluntary out of love.
Patty
On October 9, 2008 at 1:16 pm
a Government’s purpose is justice; the church’s is mercy. A Christian who depends on the government to do what God has asked him to do is a lazy Christian. Paying taxes is not voluntary, therefore, is not an act of worship. Let me ask the Christian who pays his taxes as a duty to help the less fortunate, are you also tithing–the full tithe? Your tithe is an act of worship, to give to the Kingdom of heaven, given cheerfully. When Jesus came, he did not come and reform the government to make it an instrument of His Kingdom. The hearts of believers is where His kingdom lies. We pray “Thy kingdom come, thy will be done on earth as it is in heaven”…remember when the Israelites demanded a king when they were given the promised land? God said it was a SIN for them to ask for a king, because He alone was their GOD!!! Why would we make the same mistake of demanding a king (a government) in place of God to do what He has asked us to do???? No– socialism is an enemy of the devil, a perverse twist of what God’s kingdom is supposed to be about. That’s the way the devil works, by the way, it “feels good” to those who are being deceived. Jesus said, “Don’t be deceived…..” He warned us it would happen!
xavier2541
On October 23, 2008 at 7:45 pm
Josephus, the Jewish historian, states distinctly that there are three tithes. He says that “one-tenth was to be given to the priests and Levites, one-tenth was to be applied to feasts in the metropolis, and that a tenth besides these was every third year to be given to the poor (cf. Tob. 1:7-8).
“These tithes in early times took the place of our modern taxes, us well as of gifts for the support of religious institutions.” Smith’s Bible Dictionary
tithing is kinda like paying taxing.
but don’t forget Romans 13:8
Ralph Brandt
On October 24, 2008 at 1:10 pm
This was not intended to be a treatise on Jewish history or Jewish tradition which Paul counted as dung. It was intended to show the evil of socialism….
Countic
On November 15, 2008 at 4:53 pm
How sad it is that the original poster make his entire point around “me me me” and “reward reward reward.” Somehow…he completely missed the point of Christianity, giving, and the motives of Jesus. Jesus said give to the poor. Why? So that you can have reward in heaven? NO! So the poor have their needs taken care of! If the general American public refuses to give enough to take care of the general American poor…then it makes sense that government should step in for the total and utter lack of contribution in private ways. And if you doubt that, then consider this 2-punch knockout: 1) Jesus stated that currency is owned by Caesar (or…American Gov in this case) “render what is Caesar’s to Caesar” when asked by the Jews if they should pay taxes. And 2) Our Constitution EXPLICITLY grants our government the right to levee taxes for the WELFARE of the people. The money you earn, which is owned by the American Government, is to be rendered to the American Government if it calls for the money, AND it can be used to take care of the poor. Watch out, people, for any person who tries to make charity an issue for gaining reward rather than in resolving problems for the poor. Charity is ALL ABOUT THE POOR. It is NOT about the reward of the giver. Anyone who says otherwise is selfish and rebellious towards God with only their own personal gains on interest.
Ralph Brandt
On November 15, 2008 at 6:37 pm
Countic is another of the paper tigers who post anonymously. With anonymity comes irresponsibility. The whole thrust of this response is socialism, not Christianity and the attempt to prove they are the same. It sounds like B Hussein Obama and Joe the tax raiser Biden.
BTW the word welfare in the preamble of the constitution was not WELFARE as in handout to the lazy and greedy but the GENERAL WELFARE of all. This is another liberal misunderstanding.
Lindoro
On November 17, 2008 at 7:30 am
First of all: There is no historical record of what the historical Jesus might have said. Most information we have about him is hear-say. Unless you literally believe that the gospels are “the word of god”, they are hardly an accurate historical analyses of the teachings of this Jesus. The four cannonised gospels date from about 80-120AD, so long after Jesus is supposed to have lived. Some scholars even doubt the historical Jesus ever existed at all. So, anyone who makes an attempt to represent his ideas on taxation, is in fact indulging in idle speculation.
Second of all: The fundamental principle of socialism has nothing to do with what you might call “charity”. Socialism can be centered around the thougth that it is the responsibliby of the rich to look after the poor. This does not exclude capitalism as a way in which talented and hard-working individuals can achieve self-realisation. Germany under Schröder had a Socialist goverment that used capitalism as a fundamental basis for its economy. Both can exist next to each other.
In conclusion: I agree with Ralph Brandt that there is no comparison to be made between Jesus and socialism. I disagree with the way he represents both Jesus and Socialism.
Ralph Brandt
On November 17, 2008 at 1:48 pm
Other than your historical dating is pretty bad I agree.
Lindoro
On November 18, 2008 at 2:46 pm
Let\’s not split hairs here!
Well, I got the dating of the gospels from pope Benedict himself (his latest book). He gives it about 80-120 at latest. But you\’re right: what does he know… Let\’s give or take it a decade! Point is they were written some decades after the death of Jesus, (if there ever was such a Jesus…)
Countic
On November 30, 2008 at 8:25 am
First off, I came across this website randomly while looking for similarities between socialism (small S…not strict Marxism but general concept of “taking care of each other) and Jesus. If you argue about reputations and identifications as the means to which a person’s argument is valid…then you have serious debating problems. Ad hominem attacks are often the single biggest indicator of a lack of defense for a person’s beliefs. From here on I will go point by point in addressing the errors of your statement response to me Ralph Brandt.
“BTW the word welfare in the preamble of the constitution was not WELFARE as in handout to the lazy and greedy but the GENERAL WELFARE of all.”
1) You equate poor to lazy. Infact, that is the only way this statement can make sense because if the poor are not equated to lazy then there is a legitimate concern for GENERAL WELFARE if the poor are working very hard. In today’s society, that is certainly the case. Sure, there are a few who manage to slip through the cracks and take advantage of the system. That will always happen. But when you argue the general point that the poor are the lazy you insult anywhere between 50 and 100 million Americans who work 2-3 jobs about 50 hours a week and still make less than $20,000. I am one of them. Your ignorance towards the hard working poor of this country is a slap in Jesus’ face.
“This is another liberal misunderstanding.”
2) I am a Conservative Christian. Someone has his labels mixed up and misplaced.
Strangely enough, a lot of Neo-Cons use your reasoning to keep charity private, with no general welfare taxation…so that they do not have to give to charity. Argue all day long that its supposed to be private only, and then people like yourself never donate. To me…thats disbelief in the system and disbelief in God as that type of person clearly does not feel they will be convicted on judgement day.
Lets be clear and concise. Jesus said take care of the poor….period. He didn’t say “do it this way or do it that.” He didn’t say “you gotta have the right heart or not the right heart.” He just said “do it.” Its nothing about the giver, and everything about the receiver. Those who try to make some argument to get themselves out of giving when they have that responsibility…are sinning, whether its taxes or private or any other form.
Countic
On November 30, 2008 at 8:32 am
Infact, I need to draw an articulate point about another error you made about the concept that the giver has to want to give. In America we have a clear lack of private charitable donations to the poor. Sure, the giver should be giving of his own free will. That obviously is the best way. But its not happening, and there is still a need. The next best thing is NOT “well ok I guess the poor will just have to suffer and die since no one is willing to donate.” The next best thing is when YOU refuse to give, the government force it to happen. If you were always a giver then donating in the form of taxes certainly will not change your heart anyways and you will still give generously the amounts you did before. Taxation does not beget a lack of desire to donate to charity. A lack of desire to donate to charity begets taxation. Don’t get your causes and effects mixed up.
Michael
On April 13, 2009 at 5:49 pm
You pontificate with the smugness of the money changers. Jesus… not the Christ… was indeed socialist and community organizer. But then, what have you given to the poor lately?
Ralph Brandt
On April 15, 2009 at 9:14 am
First, I gave more than Joe Biden and B Hussein Obama together last year.
You are a horse’s butt who has no idea what is happening.
And I got raped by the liberals for nearly 30K$ in taxes…
At least some of that would have been given to the poor rather than the rich government pukes…
sigh
On April 30, 2009 at 9:39 pm
“First, I gave more than Joe Biden and B Hussein Obama together last year.
You are a horse’s butt who has no idea what is happening.
And I got raped by the liberals for nearly 30K$ in taxes…
At least some of that would have been given to the poor rather than the rich government pukes…”
Lovely Christian talk. Great site! No…no, it’s not.
“21Jesus looked at him and loved him. “One thing you lack,” he said. “Go, sell everything you have and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven. Then come, follow me.”
22At this the man’s face fell. He went away sad, because he had great wealth.
23Jesus looked around and said to his disciples, “How hard it is for the rich to enter the kingdom of God!” “
I’d say give to the rich or go to hell is just as bad as taxes.
Ralph Brandt
On May 1, 2009 at 9:18 am
I sigh that someone would accuse me and not be willing to stand up and say who they are….
How much did you give?
Steve
On May 15, 2009 at 4:26 pm
This article is crap.. Jesus taught that if we had more than our neighbor to give all that we have to them.
God forbid we would want to pay higher taxes and have things like free health care and free college.
God forbid the poor in this country might actually have a chance…
Ralph Brandt
On May 15, 2009 at 8:46 pm
Steve, I have studied the teachings of Jesus – he said to the individual, GIVE, not to the state TAKE. Jesus got blamed for a lot of things when he was here, he gets blamed for a lot now, like saying things he didn’t.
I worked nearly 40 hours a week to have money for college but then I didn’t go Ivy League like Keith Obleman didn’t either but lies about it. Another lying liberal.
I have worked to have health care. The government is not the solution, the government is the problem. It creates dependency.
J Blake Fountain
On May 27, 2009 at 3:36 pm
Taxes are VOLUNTARY. You are not forced to pay them. You volunteer to pay them in exchange for the services the govt provides. Don’t like it? Get out!
Ralph Brandt
On May 28, 2009 at 5:34 am
Taxes are not repeat, not voluntary. First, you have no right to tell me to get out when people like you think wet backs can come here and stay and that is fine. I have a birthright to be here. Maybe we should tell liberals like you to leave, you are the problem. I think that is ridiculous but it is no less ridiculous than your comment to me. You want the US to be like Europe. My ancestors left there because it was a cesspool. You want to bring the crap here.
Second, what right do you even have to comment on my writings when you are a paper tiger who hides behind a mask of irresponsibility and anonymity? Come out, say who you are. You are probably a 14 year old liberal kid from California who has had his brain fried with liberal thinking.
Third, the only reason you want this is to maintain power…
truthequality
On June 2, 2009 at 7:59 pm
Jesus wasn’t a socialist. He was an anarcho-socialist. He was against all forms of oppression, economic and governmental.
Ralph Brandt
On June 2, 2009 at 8:41 pm
Luke in Acts 10:38 said it, “God anointed Jesus Christ of Nazareth who went about doing good, healing all who were oppressed of the devil because God was with him.”
All oppression, mental, psychological, governmental is the result of the devil. Men who oppress are lead by Satan. Take Barak Obama for example, there is a devil possessed man. He allowed them to call him the messiah, that is enough to indict he because he tried to sit himself up as God. Check what happens to men who get too big for their britches.
Cut the funky anarcho-socialist crap. He was not anti-government – he said render to Caesar that which is Caesar’s. He was anti-oppression which includes oppressive taxation like the Obama jack boot regime wants and Joe the Slow Biden calls patriotic. He and BO both missed the brains.
truthequality
On June 3, 2009 at 11:33 am
Wouldn’t he be against war, police brutality, AND taxes that fund these things? Are these things not oppressive as well? These things automatically come with government.
Fine, he was what would be called today a libertarian socialist. Basically the same thing. People in communities to taking care of each other and making sure people have what they need to rise to their full potential to contribute to the good of all.
I’m not an Obama supporter since I don’t support Democrans or Republicrats, but who would you prefer to see ruling the country?
And just curious, did you also think Bush was a “devil possessed man”?….for killing innocent children in Iraq? I think that’s a little worse than taxes. In other words do you think a good Christian would wage war at all if we are supposed to be emulating Christ?
Ralph Brandt
On June 3, 2009 at 6:37 pm
Read the bible, look at what it says. Israel waged war at times and had God’s approval. Jesus said that in the last days there would be war.
Bush was not devil possessed, in fact he may have been the sanest president we have had in the last 100 years. He recognized the evil of Islam. This is not an issue of religion for me but of human rights. Islam by its internal definition denies basic human rights. It is an evil political system masquerading as a religion.
Compare the several tens of thousands killed in Iraq to the 40 plus million children slaughtered here inutero by people that BO supports here in the US alone. He has released funds for more abortions in other lands. His hands are covered with the blood of innocents. Many of the dead at Bush’s hand were combatants. War has its victims.
You want to indict Christianity because you are evil. You can excuse the slaughter of babies, the slaughter of innocents by Sadaam and the President of Iran (and others) while indicting the man who tried to stop them. Your whole thought process is evil.
truthequality
On June 3, 2009 at 8:20 pm
How is peace evil?
When did I say I’m pro-abortion?
You are using the Bible like Islamic extremists use the Koran/Quran–to support war and terrorism. How can you glorify war? How is it okay that we’ve killed mothers and infants and pregnant women in Iraq and Afghanistan? Are we not stooping to the same level as our enemies? Where is your Christian compassion?
I don’t believe that the men who wrote the Bible knew God’s perfect word. They were only men. The Bible does have some pretty nasty things in it. I don’t think God would condone stoning children for instance. You don’t have to take it so literally.
God can’t love war if He loves His children. We owe it to Him to exhaust other tactics before we continue killing 90% innocent civilians.
Ralph Brandt
On June 3, 2009 at 8:35 pm
You are pro-abortion if you support Obama.
Well, God’s word is God’;s word, your opinion of it or mine for that mater doesn’t matter.
Peace is evil when it allows evil to triumph..
truthequality
On June 4, 2009 at 2:55 pm
I never said I support Obama. In fact, I explicitly said:
“I’m NOT an Obama supporter since I DON’T support Democrans or Republicrats” in my second post. And I misspelled them on purpose.
It seems like you’re assuming Obama is some crazed leftist communist like FOX is telling you. Ask any true communist and they will tell you they don’t support taking money away from working class and poor people to give to the rich corporations and banks. In fact, the communists I know are extremely furious at this injustice. More so than anyone else I’ve spoken to since their whole fight is about equality and Obama’s policies are unfair to the everyday citizen.
You’re also equating communism/socialism with authoritarianism. What we have today is a corporate authoritarian state. It’s still capitalism but fascist capitalism. Just like there can be authoritarian communism or anarcho-communism.
If you think THIS is what traditional leftists (not the neoliberals) want, then you are mistaken.
Ralph Brandt
On June 4, 2009 at 2:58 pm
You support him…. Because you don’t oppose him…
truthequality
On June 4, 2009 at 4:04 pm
Fine I’ll be more clear. I oppose ALL Democrans and Republicrats. I oppose Obama. I oppose Biden. I oppose Dodd. I oppose Pelosi. I oppose Alan Keyes. I oppose Sarah Palin. I oppose Bill O’Riely. I oppose Keith Oldberman. I despise neoliberal capitalism.
I did not vote for Obama or any other Democrat or Republican. I despise authoritarianism and the fact that people actually think they have a choice in an election when the media decides who will be winning the election anyway.
I am neither a liberal nor a conservative.
The whole political and electoral system is corrupt. I don’t support a ruling political class that receives money from the ruling capitalist class to do its bidding. THAT is evil.
Ralph Brandt
On June 4, 2009 at 7:49 pm
You cast 1/2 of a vote for Obama…
truthequality
On June 5, 2009 at 1:03 pm
So because I really don’t have a choice to vote for who I want, it’s my fault that Obama is president? And I support abortion because I didn’t vote for McCain?
I’m having a hard time figuring out your logic and your black and white only thinking.–”you’re either with us, or you’re with the terrorists” right? That’s bull. I don’t have to support torture to be against terrorism. I don’t have to accept the killings of innocent people to get a minority of evil ones. I wouldn’t ever kill an abortionist to stop all abortions. It doesn’t work that way.
If you want to stop murder and terror you have to take a long look at the causes and implement plans to lessen the effects and eventually wipe it out. The causes of terror and violence:
poverty, unemployment, racism, classism, hunger, lack of real education (meaning critical thinking skills), lack of love, disease, various forms of oppression, exploitation etc.
Until we address these things with real solutions we will always have a culture of violence. As far as I’m concerned you are promoting this culture with your pro-war stance. As long as things like war are allowed to be a “solution”, so will abortions.
Ralph Brandt
On June 5, 2009 at 2:49 pm
Anonymous and irresponsible idiot.
truthequality
On June 5, 2009 at 3:37 pm
That’s all you’ve got?
I don’t have an account here because I was only searching in google: Jesus and socialism. Because I think Jesus would find capitalism creates advantages for the already rich and holds the poor down. That’s hardly Christ-like.
What do you want to know about me to make my statements more valid for you?
It’s not like I keep using different names to trick you. I’ve never been to this site before. I didn’t realize that my argument is baseless because I don’t have an account. My name is Nicole Bozzuto. Happy? I live in New England. I’m 29 years old. I have brown hair and brown eyes. I work and go to school full time. I look forward to getting a job in the nonprofit sector.
There is no need to call me names. If you want to have a debate that’s fine. But how am I an “irresponsible idiot” for working for more democracy, peace, and ending poverty? If you want to stop abortions maybe you should be working for these things as well.
I will pray for you.
Ralph Brandt
On June 6, 2009 at 10:51 am
You just went from irresponsible and anonymous to a person worth talking to and having discourse with. I don’t care about your name or where you are from, I didn’t even bother to check if you are real because you offered it. I do think you are unduly influenced by that piece of non-intelligentsia called liberal College professors who have a lot of learning and no wisdom.
They believe – as do you – that you can talk to bullies. You can but they will be punching you out while you are talking.
I’ve had experience with it. I was the smallest kid in the class and the jocks used me at times as a punching bag. The Coach allowed this to happen. Name for him, Purcel (Bud) Ecker. Search Bud Ecker Field in Boiling Springs pa.
He was a bully training and leading his squad of bullies. Not all of the coaches were that way, one, Andy Lentvorski wasn’t. Crap that Ecker encouraged Lentvorski stopped.
I hate war. But I study it. I see no alternatives to some of the wars we have fought. IN the last 100 years we had one we didn’t need to fight, Vietnam but Johnson got us there. Check Gulf of Tonkin. He lied and contrived to get us into that one.
truthequality
On June 7, 2009 at 4:46 pm
I’m glad we can talk about this.
Well, I’m not a liberal. Liberals have faith in capitalism and the government and I don’t. I’ve had my ideas in place before I went to school and I believe I’m intelligent enough to question my professors when they are putting forth their opinions.
I haven’t been indoctrinated, I question. That’s why I’ve come to the conclusions I have. And we agree on the fact that there are some wars that have to be fought and some that were a big mistake. And yes, I’m aware of the Gulf of Tonkin fiasco. Vietnam was definitely not a necessary war like WWII. But I would put Iraq in the same loose category as Vietnam.
In WWII we were fighting against a genocide. Now we are fighting against “terror.” There are terrorists in this country like the various KKK groups who murder minorities and make bombs. There are “pro-lifers” who stoop to the level of murder. The Oklahoma City bombing. The planned bombing of a synagogue recently. Are we bombing these organizations? If we did how would we look to the people who were even marginally sympathetic to these terrorists? Don’t you think this would garner more sympathy and support for like organizations from these kinds of people in the U.S?
Terrorists are everywhere. It is impossible to stop this kind of violence unless we get to the root of the problem. I’m not merely talking about negotiation or pacifism. It must be more than that. And it has to address the problems that cause this kind of violence.
Ralph Brandt
On June 8, 2009 at 1:49 pm
There is one premise on the Gulf Wars that we disagree with. I could say Afghanistan is a mistake were it not for the terrible human rights abuses of the radical islamists. Let’s not use the word Taliban, it is but one of many radical elements. They will commit murder in the name of family honor, FGM in the name of keeping women pure and will destroy and kill to maintain their religion. They point to the excesses of teh Crusaders while committing vile acts. This hateful political system exists in Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan and other places. They want to continue the genocide of the Jews that Hitler failed to finish.
And they want to kill every one of us who wants to be free. No matter what religion or non-religion you want to practice it is not possible unless it is their brand of Islam. They will behead to try to gain a convversion. They will kill someone who tries to convert a muslim to another faith.
This evil empire must be stopped. Obama is a part of it as a muslim and GWB is the only man who saw it for what it was..
Ralph Brandt
On June 8, 2009 at 1:54 pm
One other item. You decry the radicals of Christianity, the pro-life etc.
There is one difference – If you look at the response of Christians you will see an outrage against these events. Christians do not support these radicals who most of the time are nut cases that are operating outside the church and certainly never at its direction or teaching.
In islam the radicals are supported by the main stream islam, they are looked upon as the protectors of the faith.
Terry McVeigh, the killers of abortion doctors, the bombers of synagoggues are not looked upon as heroes in Chrisitainity. Imost christians woudl have turned them in….
In islam they protect the terrorists…
truthequality
On June 9, 2009 at 11:41 am
You are only talking about fascist Muslims just like there are fascist Christians. They don’t represent the majority. If any regular Muslims support the fascist ones they do it out of fear, not faith. No one supports these people unless they are fascist themselves.
And they didn’t attack us because they hate our freedom. They attacked because they don’t like U.S. foreign policy and because they are crazy fundamentalists. They don’t represent the religion just like “Christian” terrorists don’t represent Christianity.
We agree they are all extremist nutcases. The people of Iraq and Afghanistan most definitely do not look to terrorists as heroes or protectors of the faith. They see them as giving all Muslims a bad name and bringing murder and suffering to their families.
I have no reason to believe that Obama is a Muslim and wouldn’t care if he was. As long as the person in office isn’t a fundamentalist or extremist of any religion and keeps his/her religion out of U.S. policy, I’m am fine with whatever they privately practice (or if they don’t at all.)
To stop the terrorists one of the things we need to do is cut off their funding. They get billions through the drug trade.
Ralph Brandt
On June 9, 2009 at 5:05 pm
Let’s try this. Go to a Muslim country and preach christianity. You will be attacked not just by the radicals but by the average Muslim. They have an religious inferiority complex they inherited from their founder, Mohammed, the thieving, murdering, pedophile, his name be damned. (He raided camel caravans and married a nine year old girl – that is history). Their religion cannot stand in the free market of ideas so they have pressed it with the sword.
Check out FGM on the web. It is practiced to keep women pure.
Ralph Brandt
On June 10, 2009 at 11:58 am
I ran across this in a news article, it underscores that the radicals are really supported by the masses in Islam….
Many of Ahmadinejad’s supporters said they would vote for him because he fights for the common man and champions Islam — images promoted in his campaign propaganda. Several of the posters handed out at the rally showed him praying, having dinner with a rural family and comforting an elderly man.
“He’s very brave and a real Muslim. He says what is right and he doesn’t get frightened by anyone,” said supporter Mariam Nouri, 38, who had a red, white and green ribbon tied on her wrist.
truthequality
On June 10, 2009 at 2:32 pm
It has less to do with the particular religion than it does with the type of social norms and the (repressive) culture. Their “religious inferiority complex” is the result of many factors and not about the specific religion.
Here in America we have various cultures and a secular laws. This keeps any kind extremists from making an ancient text the rule of law. Diversity serves a society well. That way no one has a monopoly on ideology and we give respect to all points of view. Instead of saying “it’s either black or it’s white” we can say, “let’s talk about this.”
If we adopted a theocracy and every word of the Bible became law would also suffer from limited women’s rights and people could also justify throwing stones at children etc. Anyone with the most fire power and money could tell us his interpretation is the right one. These are imperfect books and with imperfect people interpreting them.
Don’t you think there are good Muslim people as well as bad as with any religion?
It also has to do with the fact that it’s a tough neighborhood out there. Fascism seems take hold when people are desperate or poverty stricken. They need something to blame and someone to control.
I’m also aware of the barbaric practice of FGM. It disgusts me. This is why feminism is still important world wide. Basic human rights are still being denied and torture is widespread.
truthequality
On June 10, 2009 at 2:39 pm
I’m not denying that some people are going to support extremists. Some of these people may not believe that Ahmadinejad had anything to do with the torture and killings of political prisoners etc. They may even think that the Holocaust never happened or was exaggerated. Some people are crazy. Many people are gullible.
They may also feel oppressed and marginalized and look to a leader that will stand up for them and refuse to believe anything bad about him. It’s a very human thing to do. I’m not trying to justify anything, only to understand people from another worldview. I can’t imagine what it would be like to live anywhere in the Middle East and I’m lucky to have been born here.
Ralph Brandt
On June 11, 2009 at 11:42 am
First, drop the oppressed and marginalized crap and that is what it is, crap. It is excusing bad behavior. It is animal, not human. Humans have conscience, animals do not including animals who are in human form that act like that. You can justify Jessie James, John Dillinger and the likes if you take that approach. You can also justify Ray Nagin and the other Jackson from Louisiana. I don’t buy it. And for the most part the Koran doesn’t teach it but the radical muslims read it that way. Unfortunately unlike Christianity that is not a .01% minority but a 25% minority. Worse, nearly all of the other 99+% of christians will decry and many will speak out against the excesses. I do – I know many others who do. I believe abortion is murder but killing a doctor who performs them is too. I do think the government has it wrong in limiting protests – that has helped bring on the violence because those of us who oppose abortion have been oppressed and marginalized by it and feel we must strike out with violence to stop it. DID YOU SEE HOW STUPID THAT LAST STATEMENT SOUNDED!?
I agree that the civil government must be secular. We have pretty much had that in the US since the constitution. This is being infringed upon because Muslims are being given rights in Schools and businesses that christians do not have. We have a man who works in our building that prays several times a day – he is muslim. I wonder if I would have that right if I decided to do it. Please understand – I would defend his right to do so if it were questioned – the illegitimacy of islam is not the issue, the freedom of religious practice is the question.
But in Islamic theoracies there is no freedom of anything.
Ralph Brandt
On June 11, 2009 at 11:47 am
One other question. Would you call me a good christian if I supported and helped a man who murdered an abortion doctor get away? If you don’t then you cannot call anyone who would support a muslim terrorist good.
There is a saying, for evil to triumph it only requires that good men do nothing.
Are they good men if they allow evil to triumph? But then this is why i have and will oppose the thief in washington who stole the presidency.
MaryJacinta
On August 18, 2009 at 4:05 pm
You want to protect unborn life by government mandate; Why not the poor? I don’t think inconsistency makes a good case for anything.
If someone is actually starving, you must first feed him. Then teach him. Dead people can’t learn how to fish.
Actually, liberals want to do both — make sure that everyone is fed AND educated.
Public libraries are socialized information.
Buy all your books, newspapers, and magazines.
“Free AOL” for everyone is a socialist concept. How dare people be allowed to express their ideas without first paying $14.95 per month? If it’s free, then any idiot can come on here and… oh … nevermind.
Public schools are socialist.
The Military, socialism.
The Interstate Highway System — Socialist! If you take that on-ramp, yer a Commie!
Municipal water systems are socialist.
Ralph Brandt
On August 19, 2009 at 6:01 am
You neglect a few facts. Many of those you call poor are not poor, they are lazy. That is why I believe in helping people through giving not taxation. The government has never done anything well. Even Obama believes that, look at his discussion of the post office. But he believes the government can do healthcare.
mo hoyal
On October 28, 2009 at 10:31 pm
Taxes are voluntary, my butt! The IRS should be abolished. We will be entering some mean times and I think you all should stop trying to best each other-no one will win. It’s the same old, same old… of each one’s interpretations of what the Bible says. I too, don’t know how accurate it really is, nor do I think it is the real words of God-however, it’s a good guide to go by.
mo hoyal
On October 28, 2009 at 10:36 pm
Also, we now have 5 generations of people living on welfare! You think that is just a few people??? These people who get on these Federal programs should be made to take drug tests! The ones showing positive to anything illegal need to be booted off the system-get a life, get a dam job, stop having child after child to increase the food stamps and welfare check. I’ve had it with people who are too damn lazy to go to work. I am legitimitly on disability and what my Uncle Sam gives me to live on is pathetic. I would love to be able to have the authority to force all those jack asses in Washington, D.C. to live ONLY on what I get and see how many of them will be jumping off high buildings! Maybe this is a bit off the subject, but I don’t think so. Pissed off, hell ya!
Ralph Brandt
On October 29, 2009 at 10:16 am
I SAID.. Check, I never said that taxes were voluntary. I said God’s plan was voluntarily giving. Taxes are extortion, pay to keep the government away.
“The one is voluntary giving, the laying down ones life (in the form of labor and money). The other is being taxed – that is the money is forcefully taken. I am sure that some will argue this is not forcefully taken but look at what happens if the tax is not paid. It will eventually come to it being taken by force. The tax man will come, then the police (in some form) will come. Either the money or liberty will be forfeited. It is taken forcibly. It is just done nicer than the mob protection rackets”
AT4
On November 19, 2009 at 5:22 am
As an Atheist and a Socialist, I must say I feel a little bit offended by the idea that this jesus is in the mind of some a Socialist!
Ralph Brandt
On November 19, 2009 at 12:30 pm
You identify yourself as a socialist. You read and understand like one. I never equated Jesus to the socialist, I contrasted them because the the socialist is a robbing hood while Jesus says, give willingly.
AT4
On November 21, 2009 at 1:47 pm
It must be difficult for your poor christian brain to understand, but I was actually in agreement with you. Calling jesus a socialist is offensive to socialists! Socialism is an intellectual analysis of social-economical issues. Christianity is a fairytale that is built around what a jewish carpenter is supposed to have said 2000 years ago! They have nothing to do with one another.