Who Murdered the Feminists’ Movement

Has the growing up in the 1960s feminist leaders stepped down? Have the mainstream women seized the moment to step up and take over? If they have, it’s only because they felt they should, for the sake of all women.

Most of the 1960s feminists have seemingly become feminists with a personal agenda. Once upon a time the essence of the 1960s Movement consisted of independence, strength and feminism, sexual and professional equality. Today, they seem to have decided that their Movement must stand for anti-men, family and feminism. That women’s priority for the next century should revolve around victimized females.

Mainstream women are definitely very much distinct from the 1960s Movement. They are confident and independent women who refuse to be attached to a Movement that depends and thrives upon glorifying the tales of rape, the destruction and humiliation of all women and females by all men and males.

Victimization, abortion rights and lesbian-gay rights are the top topics the “old feminists” have selected, in their opinion, to be women’s main concerns. Topics that absolutely have nothing to do with family, feminism and men. (They continue to confuse the difference between boys, guys and men.) For the current, fairer feminists, family, feminism and men have everything to do with the future and its progress. If they consider mainstream women not to be a true feminist because they do not believe in their antagonizing, war-to-riot agendas, to each its own.

They know they are not one of those feminists responsible for wrecking the purpose of the 1960s Movement. They are not one of those feminists who believes in exploiting the vulnerabilities of vulnerable females who have allowed themselves to be seduced into joining hands with certain feminists to establish The Battered Females Characteristic Behavior neither the Battered Females Revenge Syndrome.

Fair and open-minded feminists do have trouble understanding the victim’s status because they refuse to accept the politics of victimization, particularly if the politics of victimization means minimizing and striping away the concerns of mainstream women, family and men.

Victimization has close to zero purposes in the lives of strong, confident and intelligent women who work hard not to feed into the victim’s status. Once upon a time, the perfect models were Goldman, Gloria Steinen and Anita Hill. Many mainstream women fight against the victims’ mode and fights for faith and courage, strength and belief in themselves. They feel comfortable and secured with whom they are. Victimization has nothing to do with women who possess the mental ability to know what is right and wrong, normal and abnormal, the difference between love and hate, and what they do not tolerate in their public and private lives.