Understanding Emotions
What works for one? Don’t for all.
This started off about supects in court facing a criminal offense. And then it went further as I write this. When people are on trial for murdering someone of violating someone. The family of the victim seems to think an emotional response to a verdict is an automatic switch.
We constantly hear “They didn’t show a response to the verdict” that was handed down. Well that don’t mean the suspect is going to win any friends from showing their emotion. It’s a double edge sword to it, because even if you show tears or apologize the hurt family still going to cry foul, because a love one was lost. Or physically hurt or whatever the crime is.
People know this from the inner circle of the family we have. Mainly, when a parent dies and the siblings are in grief, you hear hurtful emotional response of many kinds about who didn’t cry at the funeral or who didn’t care. But what work for some, don’t trigger that type of action in others.
But that don’t mean they not hurting. Some family members are strong in nature to uphold their emotions as a support for other members. Those criminals who don’t cry has had enough times to understand what they facing. And might express themselves later when in their cell. We can’t say?
Those who didn’t cry at the funeral might release all their emotions when alone. Experts love to take their college training and try to think it’s correct. But we don’t know how they handle their situations. And they are just as human as we are.
So understanding an emotion can’t always be predicted. Especially when the expetrs try their best to analyze decease people in sucide cases by telling us about warning signs friends or people in general should have seen. This is ridiculous too in certain situations. Sucide can’t always be read as we can’t say a few minutes later we would be dead.
And if the experts that be can’t warn no one because of the client doctor privilege. Why wasn’t they talking to law officials of family about this by handing out pamplets on the problem? This is a technical way to work around the client/priviledge rule.
Liked it

