Embracing Change
Whether the change is positive or negative, chosen or imposed, it can cause stress and uncertainty. The best we can do is to understand the forces that drive the change, and react to it positively.
Choice is good and choice is bad. Choice is good, because you get to choose. Choice can be bad, because we may not always choose the good. When too many choices are thrown at us, we can get stressed and confused. If we are looking for specific things, we make a quick choice, else we become so swamped by the choices that we abandon our search, or choose something randomly in a sudden frustration and fret whether we chose in a hurry.
The other day, when I was buying dress for my granddaughter, my mother commented about the lack of options, and more importantly, the lack of freedom of making a choice in those days. It was not only the countless dresses displayed across several floors in the shopping complex and the discerning tastes of mere under-five-years that had caught her attention, but also the fact that many girls in our extended family were refusing to marry grooms of their parents’ choice.
The thought of marriage (Does arranged marriage work?) dominated and governed the upbringing of girls during my mother’s days. Girls couldn’t take up higher education, because that would mean finding grooms more educated than them and finding sufficient cash that’d make such a marriage possible. While women were mostly confined to their homes, a few harried fathers “permitted” their daughters to take up employment if only to ease the financial burden their marriages entailed, and this slowly paved way for women’s economic independence.
During the 60s and 70s, women had to base their choice of husbands on who would let them work. They had to work very hard to convince their husbands and inlaws that their “working” status did not affect any family responsibilities. This later changed in 80s and beyond; women who were unemployed or unwilling to work found fewer takers.
Today, higher education has become the norm, even if it means staying alone abroad. More women and more intermingling of sexes in colleges and in the workplace have skewed the man-woman relationship. Women have started developing friendship with the opposite sex; they have become quite strident in their demands of what they want in their spouses.
The other day, my friend was despairing that it had become difficult to find suitable bride for her son. Girls, wary of getting into relationships where their freedom may get curtailed, have usurped the hitherto guy’s prerogative to say ‘no’.
Liked it


-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Post Commentrajeev bhargava
On May 15, 2009 at 2:40 pm
a really enjoyable article to read. i agree 100% with the points raised involving marriage and committment. it’s almost like a package that comes to all at some point in our lives. but what really counts in the end is how committed both people are. sex alone = destruction. it’s all about wanting to spend life together and facing each day together as an unbreakable team. well done!
CHAN LEE PENG
On May 15, 2009 at 6:27 pm
Marriage is a commitment, and it needs mutual understanding and agreement in regards to problems faced in life.
Mr Ghaz
On May 15, 2009 at 7:17 pm
Excellent!..that was lovely and well-written piece..LOV it..Well thought about marriage life and thanx for sharing this great stuff.
papaleng
On May 15, 2009 at 9:50 pm
very neatly done and a great message. i enjoy reading every part of this writing.
Ask Cash
On May 15, 2009 at 9:59 pm
I had not heard of the Maitree karaar, but yes the devdasis face some thing similar right?
valli
On May 15, 2009 at 11:36 pm
Nice article. I agree with your points. Live-in relations are valid as long as they don’t lead to premarital sex, and as long as the trust and commitment are present.
Kate Smedley
On May 16, 2009 at 12:24 pm
Excellent article Uma, some well argued points, also very well presented and well written. Relationships and commitment are difficult subjects, your comments about change are relevant to, change will always come, it’s how we react to it that matters.
Uma Shankari
On May 17, 2009 at 4:27 am
Valli, Live-relations will have sex. They are seen as alternatives to marriage, minus the legal tangles of divorce. But it doesn’t absolve the responsibilities. The commitments have to be there; else it will be like walk-in and walk-out relations. What ultimately gives stability to society is the care it brings to the weaker section: children, older people, the infirm…So far, this was sought to be brought by marriage, as sanctioned by the religions. The same stability has to be brought in by live-in, else it will not last long; there will be back-lashes that will usher in the older traditions.
CutestPrincess
On June 6, 2009 at 12:23 pm
a truly wonderful article full of invaluable information. i thoroughly enjoyed reading and learning from it.