Niether Science nor Religion Can Prove Our Existence

By the term “Science” I’m referring to the act of giving a logical meaning to an illogical creation.

Everything in the article is my personal opinion and not necessarily truth (unless you deem it to be as I feel I am talking complete sense) .

The distorted view of Religion 

After a heated debate with several people I’ve come to the conclusion that NOTHING can explain our existence (at present) and everything from a Scientific Explanation over to a “Magical Sky Daddy” is false. “God” is not a being, nor a doing nor is God a “thing” for that matter, God to the majority of you is either a “Magical Sky Daddy of Love” or “The Creator”; unfortunately God in my mind appears to be a figure of speech to give meaning to the incomprehensible. As our intelligence grows inside of our box, we find that we need to solve things outside of the box; but unfortunately we can’t.

Religion used the incomprehensible as a basis to develop societies; obedience occurred because naturally, we fear the unknown and tend to accept any reasoning that could make it potentially “known”. Through long term misjudgement, stupidity and distortion we now have worldwide issues revolving around who’s God is the right one and money being wasted on trying use logical reasoning to figure out an illogical creation.

Why science will never be able to explain our existence 

Everything in our world is based on concepts that we have created for us to understand. Sure, science has found some nice medicines that improve the quality of life, but wait, science has “found” “some” “nice” “medicines” that “improve” the “quality” of “life” each quoted word in this sentence is nothing but a concept we have created so we can understand thing’s illogically.

As the entire concept of existence from a scientific point of view can only be logically explained as “0=1″, we need to create concepts that we simply accept with out a second thought and always have done.

Why you may think I am wrong 

“Science has load’s of proof to back up what we have discovered and learnt.”

Well, yes that’s true, but science is based again on concept’s that have rooted from misunderstanding of the incomprehensible so despite how much something appears to “work”, it is simply false; when I say that something is simply false I am referring to the “truth” that science has attempted to explain, take for example we mix two elements together to make something new, this does not make us “creators” this makes us “mixers”. To truly create something is incomprehensible with in our closed minded walls of possibility as nothing can be added to our universe nor removed, at least not by us that’s for sure.

“Science is factual” 

There is a limit to was is a fact; if you go down to the very root of that “fact”, the existence of that “fact” is impossible according to our “logic” system yet it still exists one way or another despite there being no comprehensible creator at the top of any hierarchy of “creation”.

“Many things that we though of in the past as being incomprehensible turned out not to be” 

 That’s very true, and we have science to thank for bringing these into view, but these were “concepts” that we could not understand not an “existence” that we couldn’t understand. You see there is a difference in recognizing that gravity exists and recognizing as to WHY gravity exists at the very root (not due to mass or attraction I’m talking right down to the deepest possible thing(s); now tell me WHY they are there, not how, or what they’re made of, but WHY. It’s not possible to tell someone Why or What created something because we have not experienced a creator of any kind and simply base our theories on the concept of the possibility of something being able to actually be created.

“There is a logical explanation for everything !” 

Until we grasp that our entire existence is based on 0=1 and re-think our whole logic concept, then logic will never be logical therefore a scientific explanation for existance will always be false