You are here: Home » Sexuality » Make War, Not Love

Make War, Not Love

The effects of militarization on human sexual behavior

Nursing is, historically, a strange profession. We imagine Florence Nightingale as the precursor of a fine tradition; the classic image of the early nurse is of a missionary nun, ministering to the sick. The term ‘ward sister’ still survives, proof of the links between nursing and female monastic vocations.

However, the interest of the church in medicine has a wholly antithetical origin. Until WWII, it was part of ordinary life all over the world and throughout history for a large proportion of the male populace to be wiped out in military service. Put bluntly, the population of was subject to a cull.

In other species, the male is capable of siring a great many offspring in comparison to the female. For this reason, rather than physical build or mental resilience, men are the traditional warriors and soldiers of society; in the event of war, a nation can better survive the loss of its men than its women.

Prior to WWII, human society was very different; much of what we now take for granted had yet to be conceived. Contraception, as a case in point, was developed by the Nazis and perpetuated afterwards by the USA, with profound effects on human sexual behavior. For the first time in history, recreational sex became a pastime for all. Formally, multiple partners and other sexual freedoms were the domain of the rich man, who had the luxury of selecting and discarding women largely at will from the lower classes, his right to do so ensured by wealth, privilege and laws stretching back into history. As far back as the Norman Conquest, Prima Nochta was in common practice; a local lord was entitled to the virginity of every common-born bride in his domain.

Conversely, women have been biologically subjugated; sexual activity resulted in pregnancy. Before contraception, the only socially acceptable sexual activity for a woman was within marriage, veiled behind the privacy of family life. Religious disdain added a stigma to the pleasures of the flesh, particularly in England, while Catholic belief in Original Sin inculcated a sense of guilt over the universal imperative to reproduce. Women in particular were subject to such indoctrination, and not for any spiritual merit that mass-asceticism might bring to a nation, but to answer another difficulty faced by men in reproduction; a woman has no doubt regarding the motherhood of her child. A man can be cuckolded, and so lives in fear that his children may not be his own. To avert this, religious, societal and economic controls have been woven through human history, from legally enshrined marriage to rape and female circumcision.

2
Liked it
User Comments
  1. D.F.

    On December 30, 2008 at 7:57 pm


    The Nazis didn’t create contraception, male contraception has existed since the 1600s.
    The Nazis actually put -restrictions- on the sale of contraception, having it so only the diseased could buy.

  2. Samuel Z Jones

    On January 1, 2009 at 9:56 am


    The Contraceptive Pill was developed by experimentation on Jewish women. Condoms have been around for centuries in one form or another.

    The main point is that most of the problems with modern relationships in some way or another relate to ‘emergency mating behaviour’ when we’re not in fact in an emergency; we’re being bombarded with so much high-stress imagery (particularly but not exclusively war imagery) that modern relationships are prone to unnaturally high levels of anxiety that leads to break-ups and abuse.

    If people were less stressed, less subconsciously worried that their partner might vanish overnight, any night, they wouldn’t become jealous, start rows, cheat, etc with nearly the regularity that they do. Its as if we’re trying to maintain relationships while looking out for the next bullet because that’s what we see all the time in the media; war, war, war changes the way people behave about sex, sex, sex.

Post Comment
Powered by Powered by Triond