Minimum Wage vs Slavery
When I told my Sociology professor that I thought, in some instances, slavery might be better than working for minimum wage in today‘s society, he said that thought was ludicrous.
Ludicrous to Prefer Slavery Over Minimum Wage
There is a lot of false pride today because of the fact that slavery was long ago abolished. But, was it really? It may be that the name, Slavery, was just changed to Minimum Wage and the color “black” was changed to “diverse” which includes all colors as well as white. When I told my Sociology professor that I thought, in some instances, slavery might be better than working for minimum wage in today’s society, he said that thought was ludicrous. I understand why he said what he said, but I do not think he understood why I said what I said. Have you ever tried to live and pay bills on minimum wage in today’s society?
According to sources found here, on July 24, 2008, Alabama does not have a minimum amount an employee must be paid. Alaska workers must be paid at least $7.15 per hour while Georgia workers must be paid at least $5.15 per hour if the company employs six or more. Kansas has to pay employees a measly $2.65 per hour and Illinois pays a whopping $8.25 per hour as a minimum amount allowed paid to employees. South Carolina and Tennessee have no minimum amount that employees must be paid. Wyoming employers must pay at least $5.15 per hour to employees. At $5.15 per hour, an employee would have to work a half week just to fill a car up with gas.
Unbalanced Pay Scale
When I hear of the $700 billion bail-out that is going to be paid in order to save the hide of greedy money mongers who have taken much and turned it into nothing, I am appalled. Large corporations as well as some smaller companies are paying hard working, honest employees a “minimum wage” that leaves them in a lifetime of poverty just so CEO’s can be paid millions of dollars so they can waste it on stuff that deteriorates as fast as it is made. And we read in textbooks that slavery was abolished a long time ago? How does one figure that?
Minimum Wage Laws Feed Poverty
Just who is it that has the authority to decide who is worthy of excess and who is worthy of crumbs? Realistically, a modest budget of one person consists of rent of at least $500.00 per month, utilities at a cost of approximately $160.00 per month, car payment or transportation of $250 – $300 per month, fuel for the vehicle at a cost of at least $100 per month, food at a minimal cost of $300 per month, cable and internet, which some might consider a luxury, costs at least $100 per month, $300 a month for miscellaneous such as clothes, shoes, cell phone, cough syrup, soap, shampoo, toothpaste, toilet paper, car maintenance such as oil change, liability car insurance, etc. While $1,300 doesn’t sound like a lot of money for a very modest budget, a person earning $8.25 per hour might be able to scrape by but will remain at poverty level. If this person has a child and has to pay for school lunches or incurs any expenses associated with children, this person is screwed. Of course, this is in Illinois and I have no idea as to the real cost of living there. It can be calculated quite easily how a person making less than $8.25 per hour would fair while on an extremely modest budget. There is NO WAY this person can exist comfortably.
Minimum Wage Laws a Bargain for the CEO and Corporations
Comparing a worker who lives on minimum wage to slavery, I am still not sure that minimum wage is better. To pay an employee $5.15 per hour and then be done with him at the end of the day is actually a bargain for any employer. Slave owners had to provide housing, food, clothes, etc. and not all slave owners mistreated their slaves. Some were actually good to their slaves. When I think of earning $5.15 per hour and then being told to provide my own housing, transportation, food, clothes, etc., I cringe. There is no way it could be done. The figures just don’t work. Idealistically, it may sound like living in slavery would be worse than living “free” on minimum wage but realistically, living in slavery may actually be the better of the two evils. A ludicrous thought? Yes, according to my Sociology professor, but realistic to me. To work for an amount that does not pay for acceptable food, shelter, clothes, and transportation is worse than slavery and gives no hope for survival. A life of poverty with no hope to do better possibly drives people to crime, drugs, and dependence on others.
Greedy CEO’s Dependent on Minimum Wage Workers as Well as Government
Ironically, CEO’s who shovel in millions of dollars in pay are actually dependent on workers accepting less pay and minimum wage workers in order to be able to feed their greed. Why are these CEO’s who have taken much and turned it into nothing worthy of a $700 billion bail-out by “our” government when some who work hard and honestly are only “worthy” of minimal pay? CEO’s can be compared to slave owners in that they consider themselves more deserving and minimum wage workers can be compared to obedient slaves because in reality, they are able to exercise no control over their destiny. Minimum wage laws are implemented to protect the CEO’s and business owners to insure a desired profit level. Minimum wage workers are no better off today and may even be worse off than slaves of many years ago. The name has been changed but the concept remains the same. Those who think they are deserving reign over those deemed undeserving…by the implementation of minimum wage laws which actually insure that CEO’s have labor similar to that of slaves. Not only do some expect earnings in excess of millions of dollars but they also expect the government to bail them out to the tune of $700 billion when they prove to be incompetent or unworthy of their earnings.
Liked it













User Comments
Mac
On October 15, 2008 at 8:31 pm
they never paid you for being a slave. Besides, this is the land of opportunity, not the land of “hey, let’s be communists and have everyone receive the same amount of money”. And I am pretty sure any slave would prefer FREEDOM than living in house that isn’t their own where they are told what to do, and HAVE to do it.
Line
On November 23, 2008 at 5:51 pm
Mac, theoretically this may be “the land of opportunity” but when “some” companies think they cannot go under and expect the government to keep them going, we are closer to communism than you think. besides who can afford to live in a house on minimum wage? Freedom to live under a bridge is better than living in a house that isn’t yours?
societysfault
On February 13, 2009 at 8:02 pm
Nice post, now for the record, sensible people such as myself can read this and understand perfectly well how true so much of this is. We understand it because we live it.
Then there are the “others” that see the word slavery, and have to go balls to the walls literal with the analogy. These are what i call “stupid people”.
But yes, the truth is, paying people these horrible wages, for all these years, is only good for one group of people. the rich.
the way I see it, if you cant afford to pay your workers a good wage, you should just do that job your self.
I couldnt tell you how many cheap ass employers ive worked for, that have never worked a day in their lives.
I wish Americans would grow some backbone and stand up and do something about it.
richard souza
On February 15, 2009 at 6:59 pm
I had a group of proffesors that sounded so depressing and bleak.Finally one day I asked why do you keep painting such a sad picture of things?The answer was simple”Because we want you to go out and change the way things are”
In economics we were taught that an I deal wage povided food shelter and an allowance to perpetute the race.
We were also taught that that the slaves were set free because the industrialization of america was being finaced by the North as a relative new venture.
The south already entrenched with slaves and plantations were not happy just producing cotton they were pplanning to takeover the textile industrys and already had the land,labor,and capital.
Since Northern investors,could not quickly build factorys,buy slaves and build housing it became neccasry to liberate the southerners from their work force and plantations.
The basic principle of slave Vs. employee is a slave needs food shelter clothing medical tools housing and the perpetution of his race.Evidently a free worker in America needs a smaller portion of these things.
drew
On September 1, 2009 at 2:21 pm
This has more than a ring of truth to it. In reality, it cost more to upkeep a slave than it does a modern wage earner. One specific example is James Madison, who spent far more to house, clothe, feed, etc. his slaves than modern corporation spend on their wage workers. It is hard to make a comparison with modern society, but I’m sure if there were TVs and other entertainment in the 18th and 19th century, slave owners would have given them to their slaves to distract them from the hell they were living in. We really haven’t come very far since then.
Also, there were several arguments made in the South in favor of slavery, citing the fact that the industrial North treated their workers like total garbage due to the fact that they could just go out and find another. Slaves, on the other hand, were the owner’s property, which gave them incentive to actually take care of them. It’s a twisted argument, but at the time, slaves were often better taken care of than wage earners.
Post Comment