The group released it on Monday (local time), a joint statement with the U.S. animal protection organization The Humane Society. Accordingly, the company intends to require its suppliers to develop plans for how they want to forgo future cages. “McDonald is the view that pig cages are not a sustainable system for the future. There are alternatives, which in our opinion, are better for the welfare of pigs. “

The animal welfare organization could, said millions of pigs were spending their lives in cages that are so small that they can not move freely and behave normally. The agreement reached now will not only improve the situation of these animals, but may also move other companies to follow the example of McDonald

Caused a wave of bitter cold experienced by Ukraine, which dropped temperatures to below thirty below zero, especially during the night, in forcing wild animals to leave their places of natural populations in the woods and go to cities to seek the relative warmth, food and assistance rights.

The student scientists and interested in animal welfare, according to local press reports the need to help wild animals in overcoming these difficult circumstances to provide food which has become rare due to the accumulation of snow and water, which freezes just like everything but the lakes are few and found a migratory bird refuge, noting that he observed the flow of large groups of animals ground on some of the villages with low population density in search of food.

The reports pointed out that the animals that live in gardens specially allotted to them in many different European cities had not been delivered from the cold wave current not seen in Europe for decades, which have so far for the deaths of 500 people, forcing supervisors zoos to depart from the program fed the usual to provide hot meals such as, carrots, potatoes, and also hot drinks including tea, wine and even powers in order to warm it up.

Even the fish in the sea had not been delivered from the cold wave is unprecedented sweeping Europe and is expected to continue until the end of Feb., In Croatia gave strong winds fish from the Adriatic Sea to the island of Pag, making the population go to the beaches to collect them in shopping bags instead of hunting or buy them.

Source: Seventh Day

Killer Whale Fin (Photo credit: Ndecam)

A U.S. judge has been asked to rule on whether animals should be protected from slavery in the same way as human beings. This case is being heard in San Diego and has been brought by PETA, who named five orcas as plaintiffs in the case. The US District Judge Jeffrey Miller called the hearing.

 The orcas reside in San Diego and Orlando, and are forced to live in tanks.  PETA lawyer Jeffrey Kerr says ‘This case is on the next frontier of civil rights’, despite the fact that these orcas are not expected to respect the civil rights of their audience.  Theodore Shaw, Sea World’s lawyer, says the lawsuit is a waste of the courts time and money. He added that a court does not have the authority to answer the ethical question of whether animals should be treated as humans.

The Judge has now heard the evidence from both sides, before deciding to take the case under advisement and to issue his ruling at a later date.  The implications of a ruling in favour of PETA could be significant, allowing animals to be plaintiffs in a law suit. It would also raise questions concerning how scientific data is gathered, and in the use of animals in the military.

Defence lawyers say the issue at the heart of this case is not whether the animals have been abused. The case aims to give animals the same rights as humans, so keep them captive would clearly be wrong if PETA was to win the case. PETA say any ruling would only apply to the entertainment industry, but the ruling could have repercussions in many subsequent animal rights cases.

Some people were once considered property, and animals also should be thought of as humans and have their rights protected in the same way. This is an interesting ethical question; these animals did not choose the life they lead. But at what point do equal rights become impractical? Will a decision ultimately lead to the life of animal being equal to that of a human? The judge in this case has not set a date when he will announce a verdict.

Badgers in Britain can carry TB (Tubtuberculosis) which can be passed on to cattle. No wonder the farmers don’t like them and fully welcome the move. Among those who welcomed this news are veterinary leaders who say that killing badgers has been proven to be effective in the fight against  TB, although controlled shooting has yet to be tested.

Although leading vets approve of the cull, a number of animal welfare groups oppose it. One group in particular, the Humane Society International is threatening to go to 1979 Bern Convention on the Conservation of European Wildlife and Natural Habitats and put in a complaint saying that the cull was “lacking legitimate purpose” and that badger numbers would be under threat. They also say that the ministers who passed the legislation didn’t look at alternative ways of controlling the badger population. Another animal group who are appaled by the gorvernments choice saying that “the government is more interested in killing badgers than vaccinating them”.

So why not vaccinate the badgers? Well the minister ruled that finding a vaccine would take to long to develop whereas culling was quick and easy. But why not use the culling in the meantime whilst trying to find an effective vaccine? Seems logical doesn’t it.

Are there any other alternatives? Well why not give farmers shooting permits? That way they can kill badgers on their land. So badger numbers, in theory wouldn’t be in as much danger as they would be in a cull. Obviously there would have to be evidence that the badger had TB or was a threat to the cattle.

I personally think that the farmers should have shooting permits to kill badgers on their land. I would obviously perfer it if animal blood was not spilt but at the moment that doesn’t seem to be an option. I think a cull is more humane than setting traps or hunting but if it endangers the species number then is there much point to it?

Can we ever stop neglect and stamp it out completely,as there are numerous “Animal Welfare” Charities around the world,all promoting,and wanting the same thing,to stop animal neglect and cruelty. But are they all representing “Animal Welfare”for the good of animals,or for a reason to protest and get heard.Are they all true animal lovers in every sense of the word,and are they all experienced animal people with an in depth knowledge of animals,with caring and looking after animals.To be fair all these factors need consideration when pursuing these types of matters,do they have the sufficient animal experience needed to properly,and fairly stamp out animal neglect and cruelty,once and for all! I have seen the unfair and fair side of these various charities when pursuing individuals with animals.People being persecuted when there was no neglect,or especially no cruelty being done,and the family in question suffered for no reason at all,fearing the worse that they would lose their animals.And on the other hand people getting away with blatant neglect and cruelty,horses out in mud knee deep with no water,and no food at all.The grass was so scarce you could virtually see the flees and mites,every insect walking along the ground.This is what makes my blood boil the inconsistency that’s going on in this industry,especially all the who you know that can go on,this is wrong and we need to stop it,and stop it now.Looking at the image below this to me is cruelty, although to some extent, maybe,this Capuchin Monkey is properly fed and well looked after but it doesn’t seem comfortable on a lead and it’s a bit degrading to be honest.

Image via Wikipedia

Animals! a lot of us can’t live without one,whatever sort,big or small,rough or smooth,but however hard we work we will never stamp out Neglect or Cruelty,not completely anyway.!We need to educate people,or better still educate children when in school,get them looking after one or two animals in school.This would give them an idea of the dedication that’s needed to feed,clean and entertain an animal,so they know what sort of commitment an animal is,that it is for life,and not for Birthday or Christmas.

An animal of any size,breed,colour,warm blood or cold blood,if it walks slithers whatever,it needs constant attention every day 24/7.They are not like a set of golf clubs a tennis racket a bike or a set of weights and a bench,these you can lock away in a cupboard,a shed or garage when you have no need for them.But animals need constant attention,even an animal that lives out grazing on grass require some human contact,if it’s only on the odd day.Any animal needs careful consideration before you take it on,think long and hard have you got the time in between work commitments,have you got the room or garden space,and just as important can you afford to keep the animal,all these factors needs very careful consideration before taking on the commitment of owning an animal.If many of us would not let our hearts rule our heads then animal neglect and cruelty would be cut down a lot,and a huge amount of misery and heartache would be avoided,not just for people,but more important the animals themselves.

The Animal Welfare Act is a federal law which regulates the treatment of animals.  Specifically, it is the only law in the United States that regulates the treatment of animals in research, exhibition, transport, and by dealers.  While other federal, state, and local laws can add additional requirements on top of the Animal Welfare Act, the Act is considered to be the minimum acceptable standards for the care of any animal. 

It should be noted that the Animal Welfare Act only regulates the care and treatment of

warm blooded animals.  Cold blooded animals, such as reptiles and amphibians are not covered.  Additionally, farm animals and other animals used for food, fiber, or other agricultural purposes are not covered.  It should also be noted that retail pet shops are generally not covered under the Animal Welfare Act.  The exception to this is if the shop sells exotic or zoo animals or sells any animals to regulated businesses. Animal shelters are only covered under the Act if they sell dogs or cats to

dealers. Pets owned by private citizens are not regulated.

The Act requires all regulated businesses covered by the Act to keep accurate records of acquisition and disposition as well as a description of the animals that come into their possession.  Animal dealers are also required to hold animals that they have acquired for at least five days to in order to verify their

origin and allow private pet owners the opportunity to locate a missing pet.

The Animal Welfare Act is the law which prohibits staged dogfights, bear or raccoon baiting, and other animal fighting ventures.  This is probably the portion of the Act which receives the most attention and is the one cited most often in various media reports.

The second most publicized parts of this law are the portions dealing with animals kept in research facilities.  The law requires these labs provide veterinary care and basic care. Additionally, research facilities must provide dogs with the opportunity for exercise and they must promote the psychological

well-being of primates.  Research facilities are also required to give their animals pain-relieving medication in order to minimize the distress caused their research, but this is only required if the

experiment allows. To minimize the number of “exempt” experiments, the Act bans the unnecessary

duplication of a specific experiment using regulated

animals.

The famous slogan of the organization, “Better naked than wearing fur” bear such a transformation, advancing on the website for the invitation to adults instead of sex abuse an animal.

XXX site will be ready for launch by year’s end. The initiative started, of course, unprecedented controversy, many believing that this form of marketing can have positive effects far from being designed just to get more money, exploiting resources with sexual connotations.

But PETA does not seem to be intimidated and continues its campaign, appealing as before to some celebrities from the world of adult films such as Jenna Jameson, star of several previous campaigns for animals.

The discovery of a dog buried alive in the ground, nose up, and after he was shot 40 times in the head, resulted in extensive Mailing about changing the laws on animal welfare in Malta.

The animal, named Star by rescuers, was found near the town Birzebbuga by police investigating another case.

After schelalaituri heard coming from under a board fixed to a stump, they made a frightening discovery. They found the dog buried in garbage, but still had never seen it. All four legs had been shot and had been linked with a pistol shot.

Miraculously, after doctors had removed the skull shot 40 in a hospital emergency surgery Ta’Qali Star survived.

Strange rage case in Malta, where, according to the cruelty of the act, the maximum sentence which someone can receive for cruelty against animals is a year in jail or a fine not exceeding 46,500 euros.

Animal lovers will protest in a rally without words Valetta next week, and on social networking website dedicated to the subject have already appeared.

Over 1,000 people have signed an online petition to catch those who were injured on Star, but also to call for donations for the animal can be treated further. A local jewelry company offering 250 euros to catch such perpetrators. Star of Canada has just received a personalized blanket, and a letter from the Fire Brigade Amsterdam. 20 people have already offered to adopt him, but experts believe that now, given the trauma so close, her dog is better at the clinic.

For More click on AboutAllThings