BOKO HARAM IN NIGERIA

The Boko Haram menace is not a religious war as many people are made to believe. Many devoted and practicing Muslims do not believe in the doctrine and mission statement of Boko Haram. Boko Haram is a cartel and not a Muslim organization. It is a chip off the parent body, the Al Qaeda, which Osama Bin Laden as its founder. Other chips that came out of the body are Al Shabab, Taliban and even Nigeria’s Boko Haram. Their names are connected with meanings in the languages of the branched countries. The original motive of these evil groups with various branches across nations of the earth is not totally religious as they make people to believe. The original purpose of these groups across the globe is demonically political. The main core and original intention is to rule the government of the world-to form world government. A government of a new age-so they are basically new age movement. It is an imagination that has grown wings from the pit of hell. They are not Muslims, Christians, but a classified evil cartel. They are totally evil to the core of their imagination, doctrine and mission around the world. They are outlaws in any land they operate.

HOW TO TACKLE TERRORISM IN ANY LAND

A government that wants to solve their problems in any land of their operation with political solutions alone will fail. Political solutions to terrorism will fail no matter what. The man I pity most in the world now is Goodluck Jonathan, the President of Nigeria. He is erroneously seeing this cartel consisting of the most vicious cabals in the world as mere political bodies, guerillas or mere militants. Groups with link to Al Qaeda including Boko Haram are the most vicious organization or rather cartel in the world. The Mafia is a child play compared to the heavily demonically oriented cartel in the domain of ferocious, blood-thirsty princes and principalities of darkness. Christians, Muslims and political bodies or governments all around the globe should not take or handle this evil cartel as mere militants, rebels, guerillas or political forces; but must correctly be handled as forces from hell. An outlaw on the earth. This is the only way you can finally defeat this evil cartel.

WHAT GOODLUCK JONATHAN MUST DO TO TAME THE MANACE OF BOKO HARAM

Several times, Mr. Jonathan had said, “the perpetrators and their sponsors shall all be brought to book”, time without number. Yet the Boko Haram, an affiliate of the mother cartel, keeps killing innocent people weekly in Nigeria. He, Jonathan is mistaking for a militant group. One of the national dailies in Nigeria last week had its headline, “Copses Litter Kano!!! What carnage! In a nation where there is Head of State, an Executive President and Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces? Yet the President was still approaching the issue diplomatically visiting the governor of the State and the Emir. It is not a diplomatic issue when most of the people killed are not Northerners but Southerners basically more of Igbos and Yorubas. There is no nation that has ever solved the problem of this cartel by diplomacy. They don’t understand the language of diplomacy. They don’t even know the meaning of diplomacy because it is not in their in their dictionary. The President kept saying that, “the blood of the slain innocent victims shall not go in vain.” Yet before he finishes, another bomb has exploded somewhere else killing yet more innocent people. Haba! Mr. President! You need to go and learn how OBJ cleared ‘Odi Community’ but not affecting innocent members of the public. He should also learn how America got Osama Bin Laden expired. It is not by diplomacy. The whole world especially some who were not realistic shouted fowl against America. But America had finished their mission in Abbotalab in jiffy. Jonathan, please go back to school of modern day governance. Stand up like a man and wake up to the reality on ground. It is not the issue of religion, not the issue of militancy. It is the issue of a cartel full of cabals from the pit of hell; it is the issue of the outlaw. It is not the issue that my hands are tied and your subjects are dying by bombings in their droll, the people who looked up to you for security as the Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces are wasting away almost on a weekly basis in the hands of an evil cartel. If you cannot guarantee safety in the land it is better you resign from your office immediately as their President. It is an insult to the office of presidency where you sit!

The presiding man of God of Achievers Rock Commission International, Apostle Perez Oluyemi has suggested ways that can be adopted by nations of the world to end terrorism in their various domains.

The renowned man of God whose various powerful predictions on individuals and nations of the world have come to pass said that full implementation of democracy in nations of the world will go a long way in taming the monster of terrorism on the surface of the earth.

He further added that spiritual awakening among individuals and nations of the world should also be encouraged so as to seek the face of God in combating terrorism.

Apostle Perez who also appealed to all nations of the world to encourage their citizenry to acquire education added that with education people would not be lured into acts of terrorism.

 According to him, majority of those who are enlisted into Boko Haram, Al Qaida, Al Shabab and so on are not literate and that is why they are easily manipulated into acts of terror.

“The rule of law which is the pivotal of democracy allows for all men irrespective of gender to have equal and undeniable assess to education. And the cartel of terrorists understands this and that is why they are trying to snuff out education in any nation they operate.”

In his words: “Education informs, furnishes and equip men and women and bring forth humanity from the animal kingdom where cannibalism, insanity and tyranny rule over day and night”.

He buttressed this by mentioning the stand of Abraham Lincoln and A.V Dicey who also supported education for all men.

According to him, Voltaire and John Locked equally succeeded in promoting the rule of law against tyranny

“When you deny men and women education; you can easily control their minds. Uneducated people are vulnerable and that is why some terror groups are preaching against education”.

The man of God who had earlier informed the world about the tyrannical tendencies of ousted Libyan leader, Muammar Gaddhafi said one of the ways to put an end to terrorism is to ensure that everybody is educated.

I contacted them to see if they were still recruiting and they are.  You get to work from home and they did supply you with the extra personal work phone lines once you have passed your training along with a computer and fax etc.  At the time they did require that you had at least 2 years experience booking holidays in the travel industry but that may have changed.  I am not 100% certain about that.

When I joined them I paid £350 for the set up costs but if you sell so many holidays in a certain time they give you it back as a bonus.  At the time it was really easy.  They are just making sure that you are joining and they are paying for extra phone lines for you to pack it in and them loose money.  The management were great.  I have still emailed the manager from time to time and she was lovely.  I loved working for them.

In the job you take incoming calls from holidays advertised on teletext.  it could be advertised more now.  You basically just sell holidays and you have a direct line for customers wanting to deal with just you.  They supply all stationary, stamps and business cards so you have nothing to stand to relating to costs.

In commission. How it worked and this may have changed.  On every holiday the company could make usually between 10-20% commission. More if they booked car hire and insurance etc.  Then you earned 30% of that figure.  So for example if you booked a holiday for 1000 pounds the company usually earned 150 and then you would earn your 30% so that would give you the earning of say 45 pounds on just one holiday.  In the summer months I was easily making 2-3,000 a month but then in the winter months when it was not so busy I may have only made about 80 a week.  In the winter though you can reduce your hours and extend hours in the summer.  It was flexible as long as you worked to the rota hours you gave for that week.

There was widespread misgivings about the usefulness of the National Human Rights, commission established by the Government of India in 1933. Several NGO’s and the print media among others were sceptical that a Government appointed Commission would be able to uphold human rights in the face of violation of rights by state agencies. It was thought that human rights and establishment were mutually antithetical. At the root of the apprehension was the mindset that human rights violations in India were only at the hands of police and security forces. In other words, the societal dimension was overlooked.

The question that arises is that Is the commission autonomous ? The answer is Yes, infact the autonomy of the commission derives, inter–alia, for the method of appointing the members, their fixity  of tenure and statutory guarantee thereto, the status they have been accorded and the manner in which the staff responsible to the commission – including its investigative  agency will be appointed and conduct themselves. The chairperson and members of the commission are appointed by the president on the basis of recommendations of a committee comprising the Prime Minister as a chair person, the speaker of the Lok Sabha, the Home Minister, the leaders of the opposition in Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha and the Deputy chairman of the Rajya Sabha as members. The chairman of the commission shall be the ex-chief Justice of the Supreme Court, one member shall be either a working or a retired judge of the Supreme Court, one member as working or retired Chief Justice of a High Court and two two persons known for their work in the sphere of human rights. The Chair persons of the National Commission for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes, National Commission for minorities and National Commission for women shall be the ex-officio members. The chairman and the other members of this body shall retire on completing the age of 70 yrs. Or on completing a term of five years, whichever earlier. The chairman or any other member shall be removed by the president on the charge of proved misbehaviour or incapacity, if it is proved in any enquiry conducted by a judge of Supreme Court.

As often happens the outbreak of the second world war, saw a measure of prosperity returned to the colony, and by the wars end in 1945, many were calling for a return to responsible government. Consequently a national convention, consisting of 45 members representing 38 districts was convened on Sept. 11, 1946. It’s mandate was to examine conditions in the country and make recommendations to the British government as to the future governing of the colony. This would than be put before the people in a national referendum. The first chairman of the convention, Judge Cyril Fox, died in November of that year and was replaced by F Gordon Bradley. All debates were broadcast on the government radio station VONF. The orderly program was upset on Oct.28, 1946, when Joseph R. Smallwood moved that a delagation be sent to Ottawa to determine possible terms of union with Canada. His motion was supported by only 17 members, but sparked a bitter debate and changed the whole direction of the convention. It was finally decided to send a delagation to both London and Ottawa both to be led by the convention chairman.

The London group made up mainly of those opposed to union with Canada received a cold reception and were told bluntly that if the country returned to responsible government, it could expect no further financial assistance from Britain. This attitude on the part of Britain outraged the anti-confederates, especially the outspoken Major Peter Cashin who felt that Britain was attempting to “sell” the country to the Dominion of Canada. Shortly after the London delagation returned, another group including Smallwood, set out for Ottawa. Draft terms of union were drawn up and although the delagation had left in June, it did not return until October. It was then it could be said, that the real fun began with the battle lines clearly drawn between those in favour of union with Canada, led by the articulate Joseph R. Smallwood, and those who wanted a return to responsible government, championed by the firey Major Peter Cashin. Although the convention voted not to include Confederation with Canada on the ballot, Britain stepped in once again and declared that the electrate of Newfoundland and Labrador must be be given that choice. The other aternatives were a return to responsible government or to continue to be govered by a commission. The date for the referendum was set for June 3,1948 and all sides prepared to do battle for the hearts and minds of the country’s people.

I can remember my father and older brothers going to my uncle’s house, (we didn’t have a radio at the time) to listen to the speeches by those on both sides of the debate. My family supported Confederation with Canada, but there were others in the small community where we lived who strongly endorced a return to responsible government. Newfoundlanders and Labradorians had always taken thir politics seriously and this was to be no exception. Few people wanted Commission of government as it was known, and it was supported chiefly by those who didn’t trust the Confederates and didn’t want a return to the dire conditions they had experienced in the last years of responsible government. In many communities families were divided over the issue and even religion came into play when The Roman Catholic bishop of St. John’s told the members of his flock not to vote for union with Canada. The confederates response was to have H Gordon Bradley, no longer chair of the convention, but a former Grand Master of The Loyal Orange Association in Newfoundland, write all the local chapters of the orders declaring that the Roman Catholic church was trying to take over the country! It is to their credit that the ordinary citizen did not let this influence their thinking or it may well have led to sectarion violence. The referendum was held on June 3, 1948, but since neither side had a clear majority a second vote was held on July 22, with Commission of Government which had received 14 percent of the vote being dropped from the ballot. This time just over 52 percent of the electrate voted to join the Dominion of Canada. I remember well the jubilation in our home when the final count was released and we knew that we were to be a province of Canada, something my father felt should have happened more than two generations earlier.

Modern Graffiti comes in many different forms, from the scrawled message in a public bathroom stall to the spray-painted murals boasted on subway walls.

The simplest form of graffiti is scrawled message; “Sally loves Peter” or “James woz here.” Many regard these impromptu writings as vandalism, as they lack artistic merit, yet the point of graffiti is to send an expressive message to the reader, whether it is a political, social or personal view.

Some graffiti is used as a territory marker, called “tagging”. These can often be seen on street corners, street signs and suburban walls. It is simply a signature of the person who is laying claim to that area as being in their territory.

Stenciling is a popular form of modern graffiti, and is often used to convey political and social messages to the viewer in a pictorial form. A famous stenciling artist is Banksy, with his provocative and thought-provoking work that can be appreciated as more than just mere vandalism, as seen below.

Graffitti artists commonly utilize spray paint as their medium, using different size nozzles to achieve broader or more precise lines. However, some graffiti artists choose to use brushes or sponges, sometimes combining all three in their artwork.

Modern graffitti does not require that a certain style is used. Cartoons, caricatures and portraits are often used to convey a message, with decorative text styles and interesting uses of perspective.

Modern graffiti is true street art, appearing overnight on walls, in subways and on buildings. Graffitti artists often paint their murals illegally, working under cover of darkness with a team of sentries to watch for law enforcers or pedestrians. Because of the controversial material contained in many murals, graffiti is now considered to be a form of resistance art, in rebellion against common public beliefs and government laws. This example is of a statement made by Barack Obama, as expressed by the graffiti artist.

The ultimate achievement for many graffiti artists is to create their work in places that are dangerous to get to, or difficult to paint on. Spraying a piece on the side of a train, for example, is quite an achievement, as trains are often under close guard, and have a slick surface which causes the paint to run.

As with all genres of art, there are amazing graffiti artists, and those who attempt to be amazing, but fall far short of their goal, and end up being mere vandals.

However, there is a lot of amazing graffiti out there, and many graffiti artists are now being commissioned to decorate buildings and offices. As an art form, it requires not only technical ability, to use the tools required, but creativity and personal opinion.

Read More:

 Japanese Food Art: Not Just a Tasty Meal

 Wicked Photoshopped Animal Hybrids

 3-D Graffiti Sculptures Hit the Streets

8 Postmodern Appearances of The Mona Lisa:

Classic Subject Resurfaces in Urban Street Artworks

• Is the murder performed by a single deranged assassin, or was it a conspiracy?
• Was Lee Harvey Oswald innocent, partially involved, or the lone criminal?
• Are institutions of the US government part of the plot against JFK?
• Did the Warren Commission ignore and cover up the true evidence?

The photo above shows JFK and and his brother, Robert. Both were mysteriously assassinated at separate times!

These questions have been going on for four decades, and to gain a clearer view and more logical idea of what really happened on November 22, 1963 in Dallas, Texas, perhaps we should start at examining the famous Zapruder film…

The Abraham Zapruder footage – this live video was perhaps the most important piece of evidence that exists about the JFK assassination. Abraham Zapruder, a cinematographer, was one of the bystanders waiting for the President’s motorcade to pass by the Dealey Plaza on Elms Street. Eager to get a full glimpse of the President’s motorcade, Zapruder stationed himself on the Grassy Knoll area, upon a sort of 3 feet high stone platform, using an 8 mm video recorder. Zapruder’s footage was able to record the entire assassination sequence, including Kennedy’s fatal head shot wound.

Here’s a picture of a tourist who stood on the spot where Zapruder once stood:

Why Was The Zapruder Film So Important? There are many reasons and here are some of them:

1. The Zapruder film became the basis for almost every investigation related to the crime scene.
2. It showed the exact moment when Governor Connally was hit, and when JFK received the shot on his head that blew his brains out
3. Thanks to the Zapruder film, the experts were able to estimate the time frame that elapsed between the first, second and third gun shot..(and fourth shot, if any)

Frame 313 of The Zapruder Film Shows Kennedy’s Fatal Head Shot:

But…and this is a big BUT! There are some problems about the Zapruder film! First, the original copy of this film was sold to Time/Life magazine in 1963, and Abraham Zapruder himself got $25,000 in exchange for it. Ever since this happened, the Zapruder footage was never released or shown to the public. Yes, it remained as a top secret document for 12 long years. This means, for 12 long years, the public had basically NO IDEA of what really happened on November 22, 1963! At the same time, the government has been popularizing the idea of the “single bullet theory”, which as many people believe, an effort to cover up the entire thing (see my previous article, “Unsolved Mysteries: The JFK Assassination”)! Is it possible that the Zapruder film we see today is NOT the original, but was altered?

Second problem, there are many inconsistencies between the testimonies of witnesses and the events seen on the Zapruder footage. For example, Jackie Kennedy, the limousine driver, and a bystander, all attest to the fact that the limousine STOPPED just before JFK received the fatal head shot. But if you watch the Zapruder film (c’mon, watch it right now on Youtube), the limousine did not stop at all! Instead, it kept running on a seemingly faster speed than usual. Even if the video camera used was running faster than usual, the car halt should have been obvious. Again, this could be another indication that the Zapruder footage has been slightly edited or altered, and the ones who did it had 12 years to do it.

Zapruder used this 8 mm camera, now a museum exhibit:

Third problem, the government and the Warren Commission concluded that ALL the shots fired were from BEHIND the president, made by a sniper (Lee Harvey Oswald) from the Texas Book Depository. But take note of this, Abraham Zapruder, who was standing on the Grassy Knoll, testified that he HEARD SHOTS FROM BEHIND HIM. This means that there are shooters on the President’s front RIGHT side, hiding behind the fences of the Grassy Knoll! There are other witnesses that say they smelled gun smoke from the Grassy Knoll. But guess what, the Warren Commission simply ignored them and some of these witnesses even DIED mysteriously a few months later…

If there were indeed shots fired from the Grassy Knoll, as Zapruder testifies, it would establish the fact that there is more than ONE shooter, and it would strengthen the conspiracy theory. But, as expected, the Warren Commission and the government clung to the unbelievable “single bullet theory” and there was just a lone gunman — Lee Harvey Oswald. Coincidence? Or Conspiracy?

Zapruder video frame 375. Jackie shouts, “THEY’VE killed my husband!!”

There is really so much to say about this topic, but let me cut it short and give you some facts that will help you form your opinion:

Some facts worth thinking about – Lee Harvey Oswald, who had no proper lawyer representation and adequate evidence, was picked up by the police and instantly charged him of murdering the President. He (Oswald) was killed by a Jack Ruby even before he had a chance to testify in court. Was Lee Oswald a scapegoat? Or in other words, a patsy?

Countless witnesses gave testimonies that opposed the Warren Commission’s lone gunman, single bullet conclusion. Many of these witnesses were either silenced, forced to alter their testimonies, or died mysteriously:

A toll operator claimed that he saw people in uniform with rifles, who took up positions at the Grassy Knoll during noontime, November 22, 1963. This person died a few months later on a “car accident”, and he had a mysterious gun shot wound that the autopsy simply missed or ignored…

A lady who came near the President’s limousine just seconds before the fatal gunshot, testified that she heard four to six shots..from the Grassy Knoll. She was later forced to alter her testimony and the shots became three, instead of four to six.

In later investigations…David Ferrie, a man who had a strong testimony that the CIA was linked to the JFK assassination, suddenly died of “suicide” even before he can testify in court.

The list of untimely deaths go on and on

So think about it, was the JFK assassination performed solely by a deranged nut named Lee Harvey Oswald, or did professional gunmen pull the trigger at the order of people who belong to the higher echelons of government?

It’s something worth considering. (Don’t forget to also read: “Unsolved Mysteries: The JFK Assassination”)