Climate changes are associated with many uncertainties. This is a very complex phenomenon from the realm of chaos theory. Political pressure gives rise to suspicions and questions. What’s really behind them lies? 

Conspiracy theories about global warming skeptic combines the assumption that if there is no global warming and anthropogenic factor is not decisive. Advantageous deal and sniffing tool handling various business, political groups, as well as scientists involved in climatology. Some politicians are working to use the fear of global warming, to enrich, gained power and even created a global government to establish the NWO (New World Order – New World Order). There is a hypothesis that the Earth – despite the current rise in temperatures – finally begins to cool and there is another ice age. Some researchers see a warming planet Nibiru approaching.

Who’s who 

 Al Gore – Albert Arnold Gore ml. is an American Democratic politician, former U.S. vice president under Bill Clinton’s presidency, a senator and the most famous purveyor of the theory of global warming. In his book Earth in a bowl weights of 1992 to hold out against a cartel of large multinational oil companies, however, like his father has close ties to the company Occidental Petroleum (Oxy), which has no great respect for the environment. Al Gore wrote in the book: “We must save the environment from central plan to make to civilization.”

In 2006 he wrote a book Inconvenient Truth (An Inconvenient Truth) and heavily promoted eponymous documentary film on global warming. The film was criticized for spreading false information. In Great Britain became the subject of court action, should be banned in schools for screening children. Although the court overruled the film, but warned that contains nine fundamental falsehood on which teachers children attention, revealed a total of 36 serious errors.

Nine major mistakes Al Gore 

First Greenland: The idea that Greenland will melt and sea level rise “in the near future” of seven meters, is nonsense.

Second Pacific Islands: If the islanders were evacuated because of rising sea levels (zaviněnému warming), the author devised.

Third Gulf Stream: Scientists expect that the Gulf Stream due to warming could shut down any time soon.

4th Carbon monoxide (CO 2) determines the temperature: in fact it’s the opposite.

5th Kilimanjaro: loss of ice on this mountain, according to African scientists can not be attributed to warming global warming bill.

6th Lake Chad: Drying Lake Chad can not blame global warming. This is an increase in population, agriculture and land use changes.

7th Hurricane Katrina: The Hurricane of blame can not be attributed to global warming. During the last hundred years, hurricanes in the U.S. or accrued stronger.

8th Drowning polar bears: Drowning polar bears are not related to global warming. Drowned in the storm.

9th Coral bleaching: It can not be unequivocally attributed to warming.

Climate Research Unit (CRU) – Institute at the University of East Anglia, draws its information from the IPCC reports. The CRU generated graphs of global warming. The director was in 2009, Phil Jones. CRU is legally obliged to provide information to publish the data and evidence on which to base his plots, because the Institute is funded by taxpayers’ money. CRU, these requests for information refused. In November 2009 broke into computer networks and the Institute of hacker stole one thousand e-mails and various documents. E-mail correspondence will then become the basis of various allegations that scientists working on the project, climate change, adapt and adjust so that the data confirms the theory of global warming. The affair was called Climategate.

IPCC – Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) is a scientific body, which was founded in 1988 to evaluate the risks of climate change UN two organizations – the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) and the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) . In December 2007 he was in Oslo for his work with the Nobel Peace Prize with former U.S. Vice President Al Gore. The Fourth Assessment Report of the 2007 IPCC summarized the current scientific knowledge. In the 20th century (1906-2005), the average global temperature increased by 0.74 ± 0.18 ° C, with probability greater than 90% is more than 50% of this warming human activity such as burning fossil fuels and land use changes.

History of Global Warming
1896 – The term “global warming” was first mentioned already in 1896 the Swedish scientist Svante Arrheniem, but who thought that global warming could be beneficial, especially for the Nordic countries.
1989 – The devastating full criticism of the hypothesis of global warming caused by CO2 emissions published in 1989 WE Reifsnyder, who worked for half a century at Yale University in the fields of general and forest meteorology. His study was entitled “A Tale of the Fallacies” (The story of ten fraud).

1992 – Some governments have begun to fear some danger and decided to sign the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change. Ratified by 189 nations committed to reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
1997 – later followed her to the Kyoto Protocol, specifying emission reductions of 5.2%. All countries should gradually get to the same level, the state must change its emissions by a certain percent, most reduced (eg CR 8%), some of them maintain the status quo (eg Russia).
2004 Kyoto Protocol was ratified by 132 countries.

2009 – Climategate – When hackers attack e-mails were published by several scientists, whose parts were presented as a journalist finding that the IPCC regulate or invent data to support the thesis that global warming is primarily caused by man. In November 2009, someone broke into computer networks and the CRU received thousands of e-mails and other documents for the years 1996 – 2009. An unknown hacker data, and e-mails climatologists published on the Internet. Some texts give rise to a legitimate impression that there was concealment and manipulation of the results of climate research.

2011 – Climate Conference, 2011 Durban. The agreement, which foresees the start of work on a new treaty on the control of greenhouse gases, which will be obligatory for big polluters, India and China welcomed, as a great success it has identified the European Union. Experts on the environment but they claim it will do little progress. The agreement, which should come into force in 2020, but may not be legally binding. To maintain the commitment warming by less than 2 degrees is not enough even reportedly Kyoto Protocol, even in Durban approved plan.

The official version of global warming 

Even science is not official, although united in the opinion of the warming of the climate system, but said 90% of scientists believe that global warming causes an increase in oxygen concentration of gases produced by human civilization and the combustion of fossil fuels. These findings are recognized academies of science in most industrialized countries in the world.

The IPCC said that with probability greater than 90% is more than 50% of this warming human activity such as burning fossil fuels and land use changes. We have therefore no complete assurance that things are happening, as presented to us and certainly we have no assurance that human efforts to affect 50% of these will be effective. It is a very expensive activity.

Since 1880, the average temperature has increased by 0.8 ° C, and scientists predict that by 2060 will increase by another 2.5 ° C. The last two decades of the 20th century was the warmest year in the last 400 years and according to recent studies, even for several millennia.

The prevailing scientific view 

The main cause of global warming emissions of gases, particularly CO, CO2 and methane, emitted into the atmosphere. The biggest polluters are factories burning fossil fuels. About 20% of CO2 emissions Deleted motor vehicles with gasoline engines. Another cause is the loss of wooded areas due to logging.

The global warming show not only direct measurements of temperature, but indirectly also other phenomena. The natural factors influencing climate in the first place the sun. Regarding its effects still exist large doubts, especially concerning the mechanisms of solar activity variability in long periods of time. Solar activity in the first half of the 20th century grew slightly and this increase can be attributed to about 0.3 ° C warming of the total in the last century.

Global dimming 

Some scientists are now concerned with the hypothesis that the influence of the recently observed global dimming (the earth’s surface falls less solar radiation, probably due to aerosols) could partially mask the global warming. If so, the aerosol indirect effect stronger than previously estimated, which would mean that the climate sensitivity to greenhouse gases is stronger.

Doubts 

Paleoclimate data for the last 500 million years show that long-term temperature changes only weakly related to changes in carbon dioxide. Some scientists argue that the greatest long-term influence on temperature is in fact the whole movement of our solar system around the galactic center.

Warming in the 20th century was not uniform. More land area than thawing oceans. Warmed more than the south of the northern hemisphere. Although global warming is a planetary phenomenon at some monitoring stations during the temperature did not increase, sometimes even colder.

German-Russian scientific study published in 2010 notes that in the Arctic summer temperatures throughout most of the late 20th century ranged from the level they were at the beginning of the Industrial Revolution, at a time when humanity with belching greenhouse gases just beginning.

Some economists believe that the cost of addressing the consequences of global warming would be much lower than the cost of reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Therefore, according to them useless and ineffective attempt to drastically reduce these emissions.

NASA: Warming was not reversed 

In 2007, the U.S. space agency said that global warming can no longer be reversed. Announced that Jim Hansen of the Goddard Institute for Space Studies at NASA. According to his estimate, only a very drastic change in the coming years to the disastrous effects of the greenhouse effect reversed. But they will not, and so in 2015, 35 percent more carbon dioxide in the atmosphere and there is a time of great glaciers at the end not even ice at the poles.

conspiracy theories

In 2003, U.S. senator James Inhofe Republican Party said at the soil Congress: “With all the hysteria, fear and bogus science could be that global warming caused by humans is the greatest hoax against the American people?” Inhofe accused the supporters of the Kyoto Protocol, such as . Jacuese Chirac of seeking a global government.

Retired researcher William M. Gray has listed 15 reasons for the hysteria over global warming, among the reasons stated “the need to create a new enemy after the Cold War, the efforts of scientists, government leaders and defenders of the environment to find a political reason, which would enable them to” organize, promote , to impose obedience and exercise political influence, that conclusion was that the global government could best lead us to a better world.

The klimaskeptiky also includes Texas governor and presidential candidate for Republican Rick Perry.
 Klimaskeptici but may occur in the head of state. These include the most powerful man in the world Chinese President Hu Jintao, who considers the theory of manmade global warming hoax for the U.S..

Some Chinese do not like that should reduce emissions and accuse Americans that everything came up just to sell green energy technology. According to a Dutch study, China is the largest producer of greenhouse gases in the world.

The plot and its motivation

The authors see the conspiracy theories conspiracy main actors in the UN, as scientists, governments of some states in the left-wing political activists, or vice versa in circles of energy, using the situation with fossil fuels, to promote the construction of more nuclear power plants, etc.
As motivation is most often reported efforts to enforce a system of global government and new world order. Scientists are suspected of that for themselves they want to get substantial funding for further research. Governments are suspicions that they want to raise taxes. Left-wing political activists are accused of trying to block antiglobalizaci, anti-Americanism and anti-Western attitudes.

Evidence

The main conspirators considered evidence Climategate affair and the alleged manipulation of scientists with data that shows the correspondence. In evidence are considered all the scientific “evidence” that are not objective, do not sufficiently long period of climate change. Both parties and the so-called whistleblowers Rejectionists to allege that they are corrupt and manipulate scientific data.

Quote from a hacked e-mail in CRUs:

Phil Jones 16th November 1999: “I’ve just completed Mike’s trick of Nature … to cover the drop in temperatures.”

Mick Kelly 26th October 2008: “Around the curve cuts the last few years, because there the temperature trend of falling down.”
Wigley 28th September 2009: “If we managed to reduce the temperature charts in oceans (of 40 years) by 0.15 ° C, this would have significant impact on global temperatures …. 0.15 ° C, I deliberately chose … “

Doubts

Climategate scandal investigations into several committees that climatologists exonerated. Critics of the work of these committees, however, argue that the Commission was independent and was just named those who are to be investigated.
Critics allege conspiracy theory have naysayers among scientists that are funded by energy industry. Greenpeace carried out a study where it is claimed that 90% of scientists who deny climate change is associated with ExxonMobil and Koch Industries, the company released over the past 50 years more than $ 50 million to spread doubt about climate change.

The temperature on Earth over the past 200 years really is rising, announced in October 2011 an independent group of American scientists from the University of Berkeley. Experts started to research the scandal of his colleagues from the University Východoanglické. Scientists at work used the latest methods of measurement. The results are according to them exactly resembled the values ​​of warming that previously published by other teams in the U.S. and Great Britain. This confirms that these studies have been developed carefully and without bias.

Further evidence

Various organizations in support of the theory of global warming bribing workers organized by the BBC and the BBC “training”. BBC broadcasts instead of propaganda of balanced programs that originated on the order form and money for the UN and the EU. He said it in his memoirs, long time head of BBC news, Peter Sissons. “When she came fourth IPCC report, I suggested in the study, we have invited one of the two klimaskeptiky and recorded their response to the report. However, I met with rejection responses completely, as if I must be crazy. BBC also ignored Climategate.

A major critic of the anthropogenic view of global warming is a British politician Christopher Monckton, who accused the UN that its staff deliberately moved the decimal point in the report on the Earth’s climate. Once scientists have completed a draft report put her in the bureaucrats of the UN a new table in which the decimal point was moved four places to the right. Tenfold and increased the actual contribution of Greenland glaciers and západoantarktických to sea level rise.

Full of errors and misleading information are also reports UN climate, says Monckton, which has provided evidence and charged that the UN experts manipulate data on the climatic evolution of the planet.

“The UN denies that global temperatures in the medieval warm period were much higher than today. They ignored dozens of peer-reviewed documents indicating this fact and continue to pay fraudulent, and has long been discredited “hockey stick” graph, which in the previous assessment of 2001 attempting to rewrite history.

“Warmer than today was also in Roman times, the Minoan warm period or during the Holocene climatic optimum, when 2000 years of higher temperatures in the Bronze Age allowed the emergence of great civilizations throughout the world. In each of the four previous interglacial ruled temperatures higher than today. In the last half billion years, temperatures were almost always higher than the present. Warming, which has now stopped (since 1998 had no statistically significant warming occurred), it is entirely within the natural fluctuations in climate.

Lorenz (1963) in the major climatological study that gave rise to chaos theory, stated and proved his famous theorem that the long-term development so mathematically chaotic objects, such as climate, can not be predicted until we know precisely the initial state of an object to an extent which is practice unattainable.

So whenever you hear someone reciting propaganda spell “research is completed,” you can laugh at his boorish scientific illiteracy. Scientific research can never be completed.

A recent peer-reviewed scientific studies (Lindzen, December 2007) states that all UN forecasts regarding climate sensitivity must be divided by three. There is no climate problem. The correct policy to deal with the problem is not having the courage to do nothing. The real problem of the 21st century lies in the “global warming”, but in the depletion of resources, from oil. Encourage your legislators to finally embarked on some real work and fought with it, “Christopher Monckton much

Conclusion

During debates on the topic of global warming is a good way to increase the angle of view into the past. Humanity has survived countless climate change – according to official science went naked homo sapiens from Africa to colonize the planet, and during that time, dressed in furs, he learned to build an igloo, survived the Ice Age, natural disasters of all kinds, including the Great Flood. It is a very resistant species. In interglacial times repeatedly disruptive cycles, the temperature gradually rises and then falls relatively quickly. Recently there was a sharp cooling around the year 800 BC, another sharp fall in temperature, certain authors around the year 540 AD, and finally the last is generally known, so-called Little Ice Age after 1350. Sharp drops in temperature have been associated with major natural disasters, but people on them if they could not sign.

In 1960, science fiction writer Robert A. Heinlein wrote an article titled “Pravda Means Truth”. In it, Heinlein wrote that while traveling in Vilnius, Soviet Union, Red Army cadets told  him that the USSR  had launched a man into orbit on May15, 1960.

On May 19, 1961, the Torre Bert listening station allegdly picked up a transmission of a woman’s voice sounding  confused and scared.  Her spacecraft was starting to break up.  It is claimed that another recording from Torre Bert is of labored breathing and heart failure.

Some allege that Soviet pilot Vladimir Ilusion actually became the first man in space on April 7, 1961.  They claim that a system failure aboard his spacecraft  caused controllers to bring it down early.  The craft landed in Communist China where Chinese authorities held the pilot captive for a year.

The “Lost Cosmonauts ” theory gained some support in 1999 due to a documentary titled “The Cosmonaut Conspiracy”. 

The “Woman in Space” incident (May 19) happened too soon after Gagarin’s flight.  The Vladmir Ilusion event sounds too far-fetched.  I believe that the USSR sent a man up in May, 1960 but the mission failed.

What do you think?

The film faced a ban after about two weeks of its release due to it being considered anti-government. Though in the film, the characters are all fictional, but the essence of their suggestive meaning is very much real. This is the first film made on the subject. The film is a must-watch for any one interested in the American history as well as in the assassination of one of America’s greatest presidents. Here I am posting it from YouTube in nine parts:

Many Americans continue to believe that even after 10 years from the conspiracy theories regarding the attempts from 11 September 2001, considering it was a plot of the Bush administration destined to motivate the invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan.

Despite the numerous official investigations, independent or made by journalists these theories sustain that American agents placed explosive materials in the World Trade Center Towers and Pentagon before the plane crash.

Some suggest that even if the Bush administration didn’t order the death of their own people, they didn’t do anything to stop the attempts even if they knew about the threat. The main objective was to launch the wars.Find here more:

George W.Bush Interview About 11 September 2001-5 Mistakes He Admits After 10 Years

Rare Recording of a Plane Crashed on 11 September 2001 in Pennsylvania Video

The Audio Recordings From The Planes of 11 September 2001 Released-audio

These different theories have their followers: in 2006 a survey Scripps Howard showed that 36% of the Americans think there was a plot of the Bush administration. These rumors extended in the Muslim areas and in France where “L’effroyable imposture”, a book written by Thierry Meyssan published after the 11 September events sold 200.000 copies.

“Loose Change”, an independent documentary was watched 125 million times on Google and 30 million times on YouTube according to its creator, Dylan Avery. This movie resumes the theories that are against the official version:

-the Twin towers couldn’t collapse from a simple impact of a plane;

-the Wall Street evolution before the events show that some brokers were warned;

-a rocket is the one that caused the damage in Pentagon and not a plane;

-the flight 93 of United Airlines was crashed by a rocket.

Numerous associations of professors, architects or engineers are gathered in research groups that are trying to show the biggest manipulation in the whole American history. In their opinion those that believe the official version are crazy, like David Ray, the author of the book “The new Pearl Harbor”.

Find here more:

11 September 2001 in Numbers

11 September 2001 Saw From Space

Shocking Messages Recorded in The Last Moments of The 11 September 2001 Victims

Since the murder of John F. Kennedy the conspiracy theories have a long history in the United States.Find here more about the death of John F. Kennedy:Who Killed Kennedy-explosive Recordings with Jackie Made Public

Kathy Olmsted from the University California Davis understands why some of the Americans have doubts regarding the official version. “The Bush administration played with the facts to avoid the truth that they told us only lies during the Iraq war. Now the people ask who says the truth about 11 September.”

In the opinion of Rich Hanley from the University Quinnipiac from Connecticut, the success of the conspiracy theories is explained by the trauma suffered by the American public opinion. After 10 years many persons continue to have difficulties in understanding how 19 terrorists with knives caused such a huge damage.

For one thing, the names of history makers will a tad harder to remember and spell for tomorrow’s students. American high school students of yesterday learned about Christopher Columbus, Adolf Hitler, and Winston Churchill, for example. I can never remember how many H’s are in ‘Churchill’, but tomorrow’s students will be learning about history makers like Muammar Gadhafi and Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. Good luck!

Geography will be more of a challenge as well. When I was in high school, the world just seemed a lot more stable. These days it seems that every week, another country in the world changes its name, and borders are in constant flux. It is a good thing that maps are all on the Internet now. Schools would go broke trying to keep current atlases and encyclopedias (anyone who is in high school today will have to Google the words ‘atlas’ and ‘encyclopaedia’ – they were ‘books’. Students of the future may need to look up the word ‘book’).

An interesting topic for an early 21st century history term paper could be to explore some of the conspiracy theories surrounding the death of Osama bin Laden. They could do their research on Triond, if it is still accessible.

And speaking about bin Laden, the students of tomorrow will be studying the events of 9/11, and how it changed the ethos of Americans. I hope that by 2020, the students will be studying the history of the conflicts in the Middle East, and how democracies chased out all of the dictators. And I pray that they will be curious about what it was like to live in a world without world peace.

Why am I here? Who created words? What does dying feel like? What will it be like to get old? What was it like being born? Why do we kill each other? Why does making someone else feel bad make some people feel good? Is magic real?  Do Monsters exist? Did they ever? Why can’t we every find a way to end country conflict without violence? Do Aliens exist? Is space travel truly possible? Is time travel possible? Is this all dream? Does anything we do matter? Why does hate exist? Why does Love exist? How many licks does it take to get to the center of a Tootsie Pop? Who killed JFK? How many conspiracy theories are correct? Which ones? Is there such a thing as a soul mate or was that created by greeting card companies? What did come first the chicken or the egg? How much time do we all have left? How much time do I have left? Why is the appendix useless? Why if they are called wisdom teeth do they grow in the most stupid of places? What is time and why does it always seem to be running out but yet there is still more when it has? Are ghosts real? Will I become one? If there are answers to the question of divinity and God why wouldn’t a God just revel and stop all doubt and unite us under his name? Do Our votes count? Will I ever get an answer to any of these questions? Do I want Them?

Some of the highlights from the video quoted below.

Barack Obama: As some of you heard, the State of Hawaii released my official long form birth certificate. Hopefully, this puts all doubts to rest. But just in case there are any lingering questions, tonight I’m prepared to go a step further; tonight for the first time I’m releasing my official birth video. I warn you, no one has seen this footage in 50 years – not even me. Lets take a look. *Plays Lion King* (xD) Oh well… back to square one. I want to make clear to Fox News: that [video] was a joke; that was not my real birth video: that [video] was a children’s cartoon – call Disney if you don’t believe me, they have the original long form version.       

LOL For Obama, he was only getting warmed up… he then went on to mock Donald Trump’s experience leading an organization.

Barack Obama: I know that he [Donald Trump] has taken flak lately, but no one is prouder, to put this birth certificate matter to rest than the Donald. That’s because he can finally get back to focusing on the issues that matter, like did we fake the moon landing? What really happened in Roswell? And where are Biggie and Tupac? All kidding aside, obviously, we all know about your [Donald Trump] credentials and breadth of experience…… um for example uh… no seriously, just recently in an episode of Celebrity Apprentice: at the steak house, the men’s cooking team did not impress the judges from Omoha steaks, and there was a lot of blame, but you Mr Trump recognized that the real problem was a lack of leadership, and so ultimately you didn’t blame little John or meatloaf – you fired Gary Busey. These are the kind of decisions that would keep me up at night. Well handled, Sir… well handled.

Barack Obama wisely pointed out Donald Trumps complete lack of experience (contrary to Donalds own statement of “I’ve been there before” …. If he means Presidential election jokes… perhaps he has?) Anyways, I thought it was foolish of Donald Trump to mention the birth certificate, and he sure as hell was ‘walking into it!’, silly man. xD

Some of the more interesting quotes I’ve extracted from this conversation

Seth Myers: Donald Trump has been saying that he’ll run for President for the Republicans, which is surprising, since I just assumed he was running as a joke.

^ Not very funny, but just look at Donald Trumps face, I think he would’ve eaten Seth Myer alive had Seth been sitting on his table.

“Seth had marbles in his mouth” – you make the interpretation as to what that means…

Donald Trump: I thought Seth had a hard time getting the words out: marbles in his mouth, he had a hard time with his speech (he just repeated that xD Seth loaned Trump his Marbles?). I understand Seth, but I never got him. ( xD WTF? Contradictory? ) His (Seths) presentation was very poor and he got some pretty poor marks. I thought the President did much better: his presentation was certainly much better.

I have to admit it, Seth Myers sounded like a fool – and there was no need for personal attacks, he is (I assume) an adult, therefore should behave like an adult. Plus his ‘joke’ was amateur, and executed like a lobotomized chimp.

Donald Trump: Well they (Seths jokes) were pretty personal, but you know I expected that I was gonna be zinged. People really weren’t sure… were they gonna mention me at all? Or are they gonna mention me a little bit? Nobody had any idea that I would take up the majority of their speeches so…. (he expected but had no idea… xD)

*pause for questions at Donald* Don: Oh c’mon, you knew they would mention you, Mr Trump…

Donald Trumps: well I actually didn’t know that they would mention me. (”I expected that I was gonna be zinged”) It was very interesting, I came in and a lot of the reporters was screaming “do you think they will mention you? Or do you think they will mention you a lot?” And I really had no idea… I certainly, as it turned out, I certainly would have thought they wouldn’t mention me as much as they did. Hey look, it’s my honour, I understand it: it was an alliance, I was walking in to it, but I’ve been there before (Presidential elections?????) and you know I thought it was an entertaining evening (he means If-inghatedit)

Donald is shown a clip of an idiot who does NOT talk about the issues which are of concern to Americans – like Seth…. whereas Obama actually pointed out Trumps lack of experience and his ‘friendly’ jokes seemed quite tolerable… and it’s good to see that the President can hold back what he really wanted to say.

Some guy on TV: Donald it’s pronounced huge not uge. Here’s another one: I am f-ing delusional, not I’m running for President.

*facepalm* He is — close to being sent to the naughty corner… Although I admit mocking the way in which Trump says HUGE (i.e. uge) was funny.

Now it gets a little serious: The Race Issue

Donald Trump: Don, it’s not me who cared (WTF? LIAR), it was a lot of people, and I’m very proud of the fact that I was able to get him to get this birth certificate: if you look, Hillary and Bill Clinton couldn’t get him to do it, the McCains campaign worked very hard on it, they couldn’t get him to do it. My strength is jobs, the economy; making sure that China and OPEC and all of these countries that are laughing at us and ripping us off – they won’t be doing it believe me, if they have to deal with me. This country can be rich again and it can be great again, but it’s not going to be with this administration.

*Don mentions birth certificate*

Donald Trump: Even now you bring up the birth certificate, lets get over it!!!!!

 BIRTH CERTIFICATE, DON

Don: Mr Trump, the issue about what natural born is has never been challenged in court, so we don’t even know if it would apply to President Obama if he wasn’t born here. It wasn’t even litigated when John McCain wasn’t born in United States, he was born in Panama. So that’s why people are wondering why you care so much? 

^ Good question.

Donald Trump: 75% of the Republican Party and lots of other people thought he wasn’t born here……. I really want to get on to the most important subjects… 

Jesus… give Trump a break! At this point he sounded annoyed and almost broken…. and I too was annoyed that Don kept repeating the same thing. Bias much??? 

Donald Trump: The press kept asking the question [about Obama's birth certificate] and that’s why it came to the forefront. (I agree, the press are hypocrites! )

Now, the conversations moves specifically about race, which was kind of hinted at above.

Donald Trump: I am the least racist, wonderful person as far as you (he means Dons race or all races? o_O ) would be concerned. I think everybody that knows me knows that. (his employees or same race friends?)

Don: Are you aware of the stereotypes of African Americans… are you?

Donald Trump: I don’t know what you mean by stereotypes. Why don’t you define that a little bit in greater detail? 

Don: One is that African Americans are not smart as whites. (Excuse me? it’s ok to say white, Hypocrite!) And when you talk about someone like the President and you challenge whether or not he has an education or deserves to go to Ivy League schools, you are promoting one of these stereotypes about African Americans. As someone who is running for President of the country, which means everyone [i.e. all races] then wouldn’t you be sensitive to those issues?

Donald Trump: It certainly does mean everyone to me, and as far as I’m concerned the President is a very smart man, and I think a comment on racism is ridiculous as is applies to me. 

Don: What about the comment you said where you referred to the blacks? (???) Do you understand how some people will take that phrasing?

Donald Trump: Some people do and some people don’t and I’ve heard it both ways (??? Maybe I just heard him wrong?). It’s something I said, and I’ve had many people say that there’s absolutely nothing wrong with it. (knock knock is anybody up there? The man you are talking to is black and clearly disagrees.) I personally do not feel there is anything wrong with it: I mean I see shows advertised, positively black; I see some other show advertised; black agenda on MSNBC. I have many many black friends who said to me “there’s absolutely not a problem, that [calling African Americans blacks] statement.” Every once in a while I hear people saying “Oh he should of phrased it a little bit differently.” The fact is I want to focus on jobs, the economy, I want to focus on the fact that nations are laughing at us.

Don: Mr Trump maybe you can phrase it a little bit differently. (advice from a black man)

Donald Trump: I’ve done pretty well the way I’ve phrased it and I’ve never been accused of phrasing things badly.

So wait…. “every once in a while I hear people saying “Oh he should of phrased it a little bit differently” _ ” wasn’t said? Don isn’t saying ‘rephrase it!’? I wonder how he ever became a billionaire sometimes….

Don: There are people who take offense to it in our culture, maybe it’s something you need to think about – that’s all I’m saying if you’re running for President, you have to be sensitive to all people.

Donald Trump: I’m sensitive, the word racism has never entered any sentence at any time and I’m very proud of that.  

Quick analysis of Donald Trump

It was a great interview with “The Donald” and frankly, it gave us a lot of insight into the way Mr Trump thinks and what he wishes to focus on. To be honest, my view on Donald Trump is that he’s behaving like a one trick pony and would discriminate against foreign businesses in America. He clearly lied several times in one conversation, which amazed me. He doesn’t seem to take responsibility for mistakes, and made several contradictory statements. He seemed to ignore every one; he obviously does not seek to adapt his personality which is appropriate for leadership of a country of such diversity. His statement on calling African Americans “blacks” shows that he is out of touch with huge sections of the American population – He’s clueless if he thinks people do not take offense. Although he is insensitive, I do not believe he’s racist – perhaps he needs more real African American friends because his employees don’t count as genuine friends. He cannot work for the people if he doesn’t understand what concerns the people or what offends them; he maybe a billionaire, but he’s just an amateur with no idea how to be leader of The United States of America.

Summary

• One trick pony, not qualified for other Presidential duties
• Too rich; not in touch with majority of Americans struggling due to economy
• Insensitive
• A bit of a liar

Revan(profile) @ Triond!(Sign up/Login)

            New World Order Had a Motive For Carrying Out September 11 Attacks

Before we begin we need to define what and who the New World Order is.

According to conspiracy theorists, the New World Order is a small group of very powerful international bodies and people who control and manipulate the business industry, governments, and the big media entities worldwide.

The New World Order is believed to have funded and caused most of the major wars occurring around the world from Africa to the Middle East. This secret organization of international elites called the New World Order have a firm hold on the world economy and as a result of that they deliberately can cause inflations and depressions when they want to achieve an agenda. It is believed that one of the primary tools that the group uses to dominate nations worldwide is the system of central banking.

 The New World Order consists of high members who are strategically placed in top positions in governments and industries around the world. Some of the brains that are said to be supporting the New World Order are international bankers, members of the Trilateral Commission, members of the Council on Foreign Relations and owners of some of the private banks in the Federal Reserve Systems and several other central banks across the world.

Global organizations such as the United Nations, European Union, International Monetary Fund and the Word Bank are said to have been compromised and are under the control of the powerful elites behind the New World Order.

In 1990, to be precise on September 11, 1990, the then President of the United States George H. W. Bush during a speech to the U.S. Congress made mention of this: his “dream of a New World Order”

Then four years later, in 1994 once again in the month of September, David Rockefeller, in his speech to the United Nations Business Council said this:

 “We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order.”

These words, coupled with that of the former United States President’s and the fact that both speeches were made in September, according to conspiracy theorists is one of the biggest evidences that show that the New World Order had great motive for carrying out the September 11 attacks in 2001.

According to theorists, the New World Order controls the wealth of nations solely through central banks. They intentional create wars all over the world in order to profit from.

Having read this what is your take on the New World Order? Is it a reality or just some cooked up theory?

I seem to have had a lot of knowledge find me somehow.  When I say that I mean I really didn’t go out looking for it.  I didn’t ask to know the things I know at all; it was more like the things I know now wanted me to be aware of them.  Now, I conduct my own research on topics like this while I also play street ball/basketball, rap, and train with calisthenics.  Micheal backs his statements with facts and he is extremely well-read.  I think it is hard for people to dismiss him with any credibility.  Maybe even impossible.  I think that if something is backed with real facts it is pure denial to dismiss this topic.

On our dollar bill we have a pyramid with a reptilian eye in it.  It is not a human eye.  The top of the pyramid is lifted off the rest.  To me this represents 10% controlling the 90%.  The 10% are the Illuminati.  They have the real wealth and control it.  People connected to this society are all over the world it seems.  Some I suspect of being in this group and others I am damn near positive are partaking in this project.  Through other research I have found that Obama’s party is the most wall-street party there has ever been.  I believe Wall Street did in fact take over the White House in broad day.  I personally don’t think this happened over night, but was planned for a long time.  I believe Kennedy was our last real president.

He tried to warn the American people of this society and spoke of the tactics it uses.  The speech can be found on youtube under “kennedy secret society speech”.  They killed him for opening his mouth and trying to do the right thing.  He wanted America to be what it is supposed to be.  A country where mean are really free.  Instead today we have a country that in my opinion is totally enslaved through subversive tactics.  These people work behind closed doors and are not openly aggressive yet.  I am not sure how many people are in on this, but it is a scary thought.  If people were truly aware of how their government has taken away all their freedom they would be enraged.  I truly believe that the American people who weren’t too brainwashed would revolt and start a real revolution with bloodshed and whatever means it took to restore our country. 

For this particular passage I just wanted to write a summary, but I will continue on this topic more. 

It’s BS like this that stirs up the public. When the public finds out about STUPID theories like this, they go off about it. by walking around asking asking people if they knew the world was gonna end in 2012, you just get them to say “shut your mouth, I’m not stupid.” This just causes a giant argument and you just look like an ass. Or maybe somebody believes you (because they too are retarded), all you do is freak out a bunch of little kids who aren’t mature enough, just as you once were, to understand that it’s a bunch of crap. It’s happened to my sister. It’s happened to siblings of my friends. It just ticks people off. You’re gonna get punched in the face eventually.

So I would just like to say, yes the movies about the end of the world are cool and yes the History Channel is one of my favorites, but please, shut your mouth about 2012.