I wonder what would a critic of those who remain out of work suddenly? Perhaps because if suicide is not able to see ”between the lines” what is a story that can help us learn to get up after falling, especially when we forget that he who exalts himself will be humbled and whoever humbles himself shall be exalted, is the last straw. Better enjoy this story that has all the flavor of Nia Vardalos and Tom Hanks
What makes Larry? Despite being a regular guy, nothing special, then worked in a warehouse. As was told to prepare, search and find a course at the University of improvement which gives Mercedes Taino (Julia Roberts), a woman who is on the verge of abandonment because relations with her ​​husband Dean (Bryan Cranston) foundered.

Attend class Mercedes Tainot on Speaking: public speaking. She stopped when classes have fewer than ten students, and when Larry arrives and is ten and has to deal with them.
Then go to class with Professor Economics Matsutani (GeorgeTakei) and although he takes the phone in each session, Larry learns, becoming the best student.

Be friends a group of his companions, all young people, especially Talia (Taraji Henson) and Dell boyfriend. She is responsible for putting in tune with the clothing and convinces him to buy a scooter and discover that Larry is very comfortable and cheap travel on a scooter.
Lamar (Cedric the Enterteiner) and his wife B’Ella (Pam Grier), its neighbors will sell the scooter and help to finish off their properties to pay their bills and mortgages.
Larry returned to college and take courses in Speech and Economics is an inspiration to two and his young companions, and especially for the teacher who falls in love with Mercedes Larry

As with candidates, all universities are different, and each have their own individual preferences in prospective candidates. Some look for a student who is 100% committed to their studies, so these universities would like to see a personal statement with a strong focus on academics. This could include talking about books or articles you’ve read, any lectures you’ve attended or even any private tutoring you may have done relating to the subject. On the other hand there are universities that prefer to see evidence of a more balanced lifestyle. So if you’re applying to one of these uni’s then tell them if you play sports or have completed the Duke of Edinburgh Award.

Elaborate on your points

4000 characters may not seem like a lot (and it isn’t) but don’t make any points without elaborating on what you have gained from it. Universities like to see an active involvement in your studies, so if you have read a book you found particularly interesting and mention it in your personal statement, discuss how it made you feel, rather than just saying that you read it and thought it was good. The same goes for anything else you talk about really. If you have been on a relevant trip (to a museum for instance), then what did you gain from it? If you have done some work experience, then what did you learn from it?

Steer clear of careers

From my experience, universities want students who really love their subject, and aren’t just going to grin and bear it for the three or four years they’re at uni so that they can pick up a nice salary when they graduate. So I would advise to steer clear of saying you want to study economics so you can go and work in an investment bank, for example. Obviously, if it is a course where the career is directly linked to it, medicine being a prime example, then ignore this advice completely and show that you have made an educated decision and put a lot of thought into the path that your life will be on if you study that course.

Read about the course

A major downfall many applicants have is that they are applying for something that they have a brief understanding of and pick their uni’s superficially without actually reading the course outline in either a prospectus or on the website. Some uni’s even outline the specific modules that you would be taking if that is where you ended up so why not make use of the information that is so easily available to you. Look at areas of the course that your selected universities have in common and base a few paragraphs around them. For example, if there is a foreign exchange programme on offer by your universities then clearly state that that may be something you are interested in. After all, if you discuss at depth an aspect of the subject that your university doesn’t offer modules in then they may see you not being a good fit for their course as an easy reason to reject you.

Don’t discuss your A Levels/other examination system subjects

Your teachers, referees, whoever, may disagree with me on this point but personally I feel that it is a waste of time discussing the subjects you study at college and how they relate to the course you are applying for. It is often recommended that applicants loosely link their subjects to their chosen course, but admissions tutors already know that English Literature has enabled you to read between the lines of a text, and that Mathematics lets you look at problems objectively, so the idea that you would tell them things they already know seems incredibly wasteful. Whilst 4000 characters may seem a lot to start with, believe me you will be looking for things to cut down by the time it comes to submitting your application. Make the most of the limited space you have.

            Expanding our knowledge becomes very limited without communication. The idea of global dialogue, or keeping in touch with fellow countries, is one of the many benefits of global interdependence. With today’s advanced methods of contact, it’s been made much easier to exchange these ideas that benefit our country. People can come into our country faster with their visionary views on products and inventions, and from these insights we can discover ways to better improve our current items and even fabricate products and ideas of our own. These expansions can occur between any set of countries, but thrive in the industrialized countries such as North America, parts of Europe, China, Japan, and many others. One example of how ideas are shared through foreign investment would be Nestle’s expansion to America during WWI. Prior to the war, chocolate sold decently, but when Europe became involved in the war, sales plummeted and they had to find new ways of making income, or file bankruptcy. They decided to make other products such as baby food, dairy, and still made some chocolate. When food ran scarce during the war, they sold a lot of products due to the shortage. From there, business kept increasing, and with the extra money they bought parts of other companies like Carnation and Maybelline. From there, they took their company even further and moved a branch into the United States by the early 1900’s. Because their expansion became so successful, this inspired many companies to do as they had, and Nestle was able to buy other companies too and experiment with products with their own influence as well as those in the countries they went to. We had an effect on them just as they did on us. This is why global dialogue is important, to expand our knowledge, which is always a good idea.

            Another reason why global interdependence has become so useful to our country is how beneficial it’s become to large corporations. Yes, this may seem like an odd statement at first because really, why would big businesses want other corporations to fight against? Well that’s it right there; our economy calls for competition. Without this little factor in our country, we wouldn’t have the determination to go further than our expectations; we wouldn’t dare do better than we know we can do. Businesses get more competition when another business enters the country because they feel the need to outdo the opposing corporation so they can have a better reputation. Due to the competition, prices get lower and the desire to have those products will rise dramatically. With these better known and less expensive items, the product can be taxed, which further benefits our economy. Still not convinced that this battle between companies doesn’t benefit the country greatly? Well, foreign firms account for more than 18% of total U.S. merchandise exports. That may not seem like a large number, but if one really thought about it, it’s quite a lot of money, over $3 trillion dollars to be exact. And not only that, but those companies that come to America accounted for over 20% of our exports. Having people put businesses in our country really is helpful, and it does help them by getting their corporation name out in the open, but it benefits us financially too, so it’s a win-win for both participants.

            Besides expanding our knowledge and creating competition, what good is foreign investment? Well, as it turns out, when foreign companies move into the U.S. it creates more jobs for Americans. For outside countries to come into America and branch out their businesses can’t just benefit them, so they tend to hire a good majority of Americans workers. As a matter of fact, in 2009, foreign firms like Toyota employed over 5.7 million American workers! If we had more corporations offering that many jobs, our unemployment rate would decline and it would really help in the stimulation of our economy. An estimation by IIUSA states that since 2003, $3.1 billion has been invested to the foreign capital in the U.S. Economy, creating well over 65,000 jobs for American workers, and better yet, didn’t affect U.S. taxpayers at all. With statistics such as these, it’s hard to deny the facts, and even harder to push aside how truly beneficial global interdependence is to our country’s economy.

            Like any good thing, global has its problems, the benefits are great, and its positive effect on the American economy is simply incredible. From having other countries branch their businesses into the United States, we get amazing new ideas for products and learn how to improve the items we already have, and better yet, we keep in touch with our ‘neighbors’ which can essentially maintain peace. Besides brilliant new ideas, it also creates competition for big businesses, and the items involved can be taxed which helps America even more. With lower prices on these products, the demand for those items gets higher which stimulates our economy even further. And when these foreign investors come into our country, we get more jobs in our country for U.S. workers so our unemployment will be much, much lower. It’s obvious to see how big of an advantage global interdependence is, and it really does help America as a whole. Let’s stay open minded about ways for America to get out of the whole once more. Like Roosevelt was saying, we shouldn’t wait for the snake to strike; we should take hold of the situation now and do something good for ourselves while helping other countries too. Foreign investment has helped us so much already, so why stop now?

All of this started supposedly on September 17, 2011 but actually we have to take into account the rest of the world.  The OWS is just the continuation of a cancer that started in the 3rd world countries with the intervention of the IMF and the forceful imposition of its redemption packages. The very same banks that caused the financial crisis that started on 2000 (the press says it started on 2007) were the responsible for the collapse of many nations like Argentina, Ecuador, Japan and many many more.

Sooner of later this sickness had to come home with such a dramatic impact.  Reviewing all the evidence, the origin in the US would be with the presidency of Ronald Reagan.  Reagan handed the country to the service of the supper rich.  Just taking a look to the salaries of workers, these have not increased ever since.  Nowadays, the upper 1% of the people in the US takes in nearly a quarter of the nation‘s income. All the growth that has occurred in our country over the last decade or more has gone to the upper 1%. Much of the wealth of this 1% comes from investments in political capital in Washington [Vanity Fair May 2011] The average American worker was taking home $752 a week in late 2010 while the median pay for top executives at 200 big companies last year was $10.8 million. In fact, the gap between chief executive compensation and average US worker pay rose from a ratio of 263 to 1 in 2009 to 325 to 1 on 2010. [Washington Post Aug 31st 2011] It is estimated that 400 US Americans have more wealth than half of all Americans combined. This exclusive group benefited directly or indirectly from the multi-trillion bailout in 2008, and now they have more cash, stock and property than the assets of 155 million Americans combined.  Globally, the richest 2% owns more than half the household wealth in the entire world and the richest 10% holds 85% of total.

All the info is taken from the book “Confrontational Poetry”

1. Making a buck on the web is impossible.

2. Privacy is a joke. Every communication goes through a government computer. 

3. Fraud is rampant. I paid $49 to a group calling itself “Interactive Media” that offered “Opt In” email marketing. They reported sending out 300,000 emails, some 80,000 of which were reportedly opened. It’s a sham. My email directed readers to my site, but I received no increase in page views. That means “Interactive media” and its “Opt In” emails are bogus.

4. “Internet banking” is a fraud. I personally watched a foreign bank, “Sharebuilder,” debit my back account after I tried to stop it. Strangely enough, a year later, my local bank account was credited with over $80.

5. Criminals using social media have tracked down and harmed others.

6. Computer hacking is commonplace. Over a decade, I spent weeks or even months countering hackers’ efforts to bring down my computer. Hacking is the rule not the exception.

7. My sense is that software piracy is quite common. Perhaps the courts made a mistake by allowing Apple to imitate Xerox’s Star program, and later allowing Microsoft to do the same to Apple. I put a “windows” style operating system on a microcomputer before Bill Gates, but I wouldn’t bother trying to make a living as a programmer these days. It takes months to produce something worthwhile, and copying is commonplace.

8. Google now personalizes search results. Typing in “catastrophe” on Google in New York yields a different result that in Los Angeles.

9. The web is basically a government sham.

Still, in some ways search engines improve political communication. Compare the millions or billions of websites to the Orwell era of the 1980’s. Many more people are communicating. Further, I successfully used the web to communicate politically and change a bad statute.

Overall, however, the web isn’t promoting freedom. First, the state came along with credit cards. Then, they tried to control cash with things like the $10,000 limit. Then, they tried to control everything on a computer. The web is becoming just another tool for control freaks. In my view, the information revolution will just move to other places.

Image by EronsPics via Flickr

Fifteen years ago, if you would have told me that I wouldn’t be driving a flying car, I’d have said: “what the hell? Damn you, Back to the Future!” If you would have told me that I’d have my own personal phone number and I’d be carrying a picture taking, internet surfing, text messaging, touch screen phone in my pocket, I would have said: “Yea right, what are internets anyway?” Now that the future is here and a robot didn’t write this, I’m kind of wishing technology would hurry up a bit and catch up with the movies already.

You’d think we’d have way more free time as technology improves.

Liking someone’s Facebook status is considered an acceptable form of staying in contact. E-mail and text messaging are replacing letter mail and phone calls. The only thing you’re getting in the mail now is spam, bills, and the occasional handwritten postcard that seemed to have required way too much effort to get to your mailbox. You almost feel sorry for all those hands, sweating under the halogen bulbs at the post office just to get you this card your Mother sent from Maui. Do you even know how to send a postcard? Trust me, it’s not easy. Go and send some before it’s too late. Then you’ll have stories to tell your grandchildren about the old days.

With all this technology, shouldn’t we be asking, “Why are we still working so much?” But, until labor laws change, forcing a seven hour work day with thirty days paid vacation a year, we’re stuck with the same workload as our pre-smartphone ancestors of the 1990’s.

Is anyone in control of the tech world anyway? If a 16 year old kid can hack into a $199.00 E-book reader and convert it into an Android running tablet, or college kids can start social networking sites from their dorms, and twenty five year old tech savvys can get lost in the confusion of a smartphone era dominated by seventeen year old cheerleaders, then who’s running the show?

All that spy and surveillance stuff you see in the movies is true. At least five years ago the NYPD was able to nail a bunch of mafia bosses and send them to jail from evidence collected while monitoring their cellphones. The police weren’t tapping the phone conversations they were having, they were remotely activating the microphones, even if the cellphone was shut off! So, if you want to be 100% sure that no one is listening to you sing to Celine Dion in your car, you’re going to have to take the battery out of your phone.

If you think that’s bad, don’t worry, it gets worse. Last month, out of curiosity, a mid-level German government official wanted to know how many times his cell phone service provider recorded his location. He had to take them to court for this information, where he made a shocking discovery. Over six months, his grid coordinates were recorded over 35,000 times! That’s roughly 194 times a day. Anyone with a cellphone can easily be tracked and there’s nothing illegal about it.

In 2010, a case went up to the Supreme Court for whatever reason and it had to do with communications issues like texting and phone calls. The most powerful judge in the world and one of the younger justices on the court, Chief Justice John Roberts, at one point asked, what’s the difference “between e-mail and a pager?” Another justice asked, “If a text message is sent to an officer at the same time he was sending one to someone else, does it say, ‘your call is important to us, and we will get back to you?’” A third justice, still on the the same case said, “You mean it (the text) doesn’t go right to me?”

Speaking of the whole legality of technology, it clearly moves too fast for our legal system. We’ve got politicians in their seventies drafting laws and writing bills determining how we can and can’t use our phones and computers. Can you imagine your grandma making the rules for how you can use your smartphone? This is all very dangerous stuff. Not because our grandmothers will legally obligate us to call her once a week, but because big businesses like ATT, Verizon, Google, and Facebook know that our Representatives don’t know the difference between TTYL and FML. They’ve been swarming Congress with lobbyist to influence new legislation that only has business interests in mind. Big business influenced legislation could cause plenty of damage to consumers like you and I, who’re distracted by cute kitten videos as this takes place. Businesses have convinced seventy something year old Senator John McCain into thinking and saying that Net Neutrality is bad for America, when he probably thinks Google is a dance move, Yahoo is a drink mix, and Sarah Palin would make a good running mate.

A democracy created over two hundred years ago by wig wearing men just can’t keep up with the tech world. There are thousands of gaps and loopholes in the law that aren’t sufficient to protect our rights. So, while we twitter our quote for the day and tag ourselves in photos, gaps are being filled by the thick greedy hands of corporations.

They can take away our freedom, but they can never take away our LoL Cats.

Check out my blog at Subsurfacenews.com

Schools have become autonomous enterprises as they determine their own budgets as well as the need for future funding. They plan building projects and modern technology to help them grow over time. Managers employ staff based on their reputation to help create a place where students will want to learn and improve their prospects. Meadmore (2004) suggests that learning institutions adopted a hierarchical approach as a way organising them. He suggests that government departments and school boards determine what is taught as well as how it is taught.

Curriculums are designed to teach people what the authorities consider they should be taught. Teachers consider that they have little power to alter the material, yet they have the knowledge and skills to know what is appropriate for children and what is not. In conclusion schools and other learning institutions are expected to deliver on pre-determined objectives to justify the funding that they receive from the government.

Only recently, the Chinese economy overtook that of Japan’s and took up the position of the second largest economy in the world with over $2.3 trillion. The Chinese economy has been nothing less than a spectacle with people studying it with awe as a country manages to lift out its people from poverty at such a large scale.

Again, the sheer size of the economy makes it hard for Chinese economists to manage it with the minimum number of problems. China practises a policy known as “One country, two systems”. Under this policy, the lesser developed western side of the country follows communism completely where all means of production is taken up by the state, however in the eastern part of the country, especially on the coast which is fairly more developed, a fairly liberalized form of economy is practised. Most of China’s growth has been centralized in the eastern part especially in cities like Shanghai, Beijing, Tianjin, Chongqing and other cities.

Foreign firms usually have their production facilities here and such a system is followed precisely to bring in foreign investment from abroad by promising them Special Economic Zones where there would be good infrastructure and cheap labour and access to huge markets. With more employment generated with higher investments, we see many people being lifted out of poverty and into the middle class. Their savings started shooting up and more and more people started investing. The housing shortage in China prompted a steady increase in real estate prices. With more and more people having the purchasing power, the real estate prices started soaring. Construction and real estate boomed. More and more people started buying real estate for speculative purposes. This has come to such a large extent that 10% of China’s GDP comes from the real estate sector.

Again, this attributes to basic demand and supply economics. But the problem is that such a model is a big risk. This was how the recession started in the United States. This was exactly went wrong with Dubai and brought it down to its knees. The real estate sector in China constitutes 10% of its GDP annually. So in case this bubble bursts, there is going to be a lot of trouble.

So what is going to happen in case the real estate sector in China bursts?

The global economy is going to suffer without a doubt. However, the Chinese economy is strong with a big industrial base and it has big foreign exchange reserves in case something goes wrong. Besides, its 1.3 Billion population provides itself with a huge internal market and therefore the shocks won’t be too jolting. However, the pinch is going to be definitely felt worldwide. Worldwide trade with China will be hurt obviously.

If you take a closer look at the kind of goods China imports, you will notice it is mainly raw material. Steel, concrete, oil and other raw materials top its list of imports.

With a slowdown in the construction sector, there won’t be demand for raw materials for new construction. China will be able to provide for that small scale of construction with its own reserves of raw material. Since the demand during the boom was so high, many countries benefited immensely with its exports. Especially many countries like India, Australia, South Africa and other countries. Trade is going to be imbalanced.

This will affect employment in these countries because of reduced demand. There may be pay cuts or even lay-offs. It will affect the countries exporting steel, cement and other raw materials the most. China has never needed labour from abroad for its construction sector so we see that remittances may not be affected at all.

Though many experts predict that the bubble might burst soon, the ramifications won’t be so bad for the sole fact that the Chinese economy is run on an industrial base which is growing really fast. Its industrial base acts as the economy’s own insurance.

In fact, if the bubble does burst, and the prices of real estate comes down, then more and more people will be able to afford homes, thereby mitigating the housing crisis China faces today. Again, this is in no way endorsing that the bubble should burst, it is merely stating the silver lining in the dark cloud.

The only worry is the workers that may be laid off as a result of the crash. With their purchasing power greatly diminished, they won’t be able to spend money and accommodating them in the other sectors of the economy will take a while. The reduce in demand will affect China and the global economy in a way.

To sum it all up, the news of a bubble crash is still, as of now, a prediction. We don’t know how far that will be true. We can all pray that it won’t be true, but in case it does, the world need not worry about it a lot.

Copyright © 2012 Ashwath Komath

CNN has cited more surprising results in Japan’s fall to #4, taking into account a forecast contraction in population size. More surprising still is the prediction that India’s will overtake Japan to hold position #3 and Mexico’s placement above France.

New entries into the top 20 (not shown) include Egypt and Philippines, showing one of the largest improvements of 27 places.

HSBC’s predictions for the top 10 economies in 2050:

1. China

2. US

3. India

4. Japan

5. Germany

6. UK

7. Brazil

8. Mexico

9. France

10. Canada

In comparison to the actual standings in 2010:

1. U.S.

2. Japan

3. China

4. Germany

5. UK

6. France

7. Italy

8. India

9. Brazil

10. Canada

Growth is determined by working population trends and productivity forecasts. This takes into account access to education as an enabler, democratic principles of government and rule of law.

As stated in the study it is impossible to account for the likelihood and impacts of aspects such as war and barriers to migrating populace upon economies.

You may also be interested in ‘Why China’s Economy Will Be #1 In 2050′ 

About the author

Daniel is a professional freelance SEO enthusiast and web / graphic designer with eif media and a paid writer and blogger for Triond, a place where original content is rewarded. 

Some of his foolish beliefs include making the internet a more attractive and informative place.