he description was phrased English Ambassador to Philippines, Level Canning, today. In a written declaration sent toVIVAnews , Canning sensed the need to arrange the UK’s position relevant to the results of the Western Authorities conference in The town, The country, on 8 to 9 January 2011. “The UK is element of the Western Partnership as last Exclusive. Britain will keep be dedicated to the Western Partnership. Britain will keep be the excellent moving company in deepening the individual industry, giving effect in the development of the Western Partnership and European countries dedicated to a more versatile and energetic, “said Canning. According to information organization Reuters , Level Cameron as pm last Exclusive saying that he would not think twice to veto (block) all deals in the Western Partnership in approaching the financial debt turmoil in the team using the dollar (eurozone) if not to secure English passions, which are not included in the eurozone.

For the UK, demanding management over the funds of the Western Partnership associates can be damaging to London, uk, as one of the economical middle. Cameron was actually veto the choice of the Western Partnership funds management matter at a conference in The town the other day. The move was made ​​Cameron became alienated from his other EU management. In fact, on one occasion at a conference the other day, France Chief executive, Nicolas Sarkozy, was not willing to wait on Cameron who wanted to move hands.

Then worries happen, such as those revealed by the worldwide media, whether Britain would remain a participant of the Western Partnership. Ambassador Canning sensed the need to extend out the information on that development. According to him, English semerta not actually get involved in essential conversations in the Western Partnership is only to search for unique therapy or, as has been revealed by several parties, planning a veto. “Britain does not search for unique therapy for the Town of London, uk. Britain, in a simple and sense is only trying to ensure the conditions on the ground to be managed properly so outside Eurozone interest can be more alert, “said Canning. However, Britain was frustrated that other EU management can not give confidence that English passions are not injured in the image of the turmoil.

“Our frustration is the kind of protection can not be given. It is clearly better, therefore, for nations around the world that are element of the Eurozone must arrange independently,” said Canning. Prime Reverend Level Cameron, according to Mr Canning, regularly highlighted the need to take action to the problems that hit the Eurozone – although English, not such as associates of the team – and London’s responsibility to play a beneficial role in that process.

“The UK is by far the nation that is able to appeal to investment into the biggest nation in the Western Partnership, and of course for foreign traders is the entrance to the UK industry a large EU, “said Canning.  Town of London, uk is a leading economical services middle in the world and worldwide markets are essential individual. Attention of capital and the UK offers an unrivaled functionality, and reinforced by environment legislation that are effective, reasonable, and precise.

Greece can be a civilized and developed country, which has a capitalism, the tourism like a major method of obtaining earnings. It is a member of the European Union which exerts a terrific influence about the entire world altogether fields and areas. Additionally , it has a high quality of life.

The Greek economy grew considerably until 2007, but beginning from 2009 it went into recession on account of your budget deficit plus the debts which the government has made. Until 2008 Greece had on the list of highest rates in the Euro-zone on its gross domestic product, being considered a country through an advanced high-income economy. Unfortunately, 000-153 since 2009 the world financial crisis affected not only Greece and the members in the European Union but other countries, even most developed ones. In 2009 Greece’s economy and budget faced the very best deficit and debts from the many The European union. The inflation, the speed of unemployment, the debts along with the budget deficits were regarded as being above the standard with the Eu this season. The federal government, forced with that economic decline, by the Eu and by the international market collaborators, adopted an austerity program, on the list of harshest in Europe.

This austerity program has led to several protests and riots, and also generated a small diminishing with the budget deficit this season. This austerity program included reforms, particularly in the medical and pension systems, inside public sector which included a reduction of dimensions, structural reforms on labor and reforms to industry and product markets.

This year Greece has received considerable the aid of European Union and The International Fund which provided short terms loans and medium terms loans in order to help the country to the debts and minimize the deficit. Cash advance loans and other measures for example credits, or a good investment in gold, for instance, during times of financial disaster are solutions which could reduce the deficits. In 2011 the Greek government has 350-001 created major structural reforms, even so the Greek National Bank’s forecast remains bleak, the rates in the economic growth being considered still negative.

Belgium today is witnessing the first general strike in nearly twenty years to protest government austerity measures, which meets at a time when EU leaders to sign a permanent fund to save for the euro area.
It is expected that this strike to an almost complete paralysis in Belgium, closing down the entire network of trains and buses, and many schools will close their doors and cease production in the factories Audi and Volvo.
Brussels Airport was forced to cancel all flights because of the union plans to stop the access roads to the airport.
The unions have called for the first general strike in the country since 1993 because of government plans to increase the effective age of retirement, in addition to other procedures designed to provide 11.3 billion euros ($ 14.84 billion).
  The government also froze 1.3 billion euros of spending beginning of the year after a warning from the European Commission that Brussels is not on track to meet its objectives. Belgium has pledged to reduce the budget deficit to below the level required by the EU of 3% of gross domestic product.
It followed the Fitch credit rating classification of the example of Fannie Standard & Poor’s and Moody’s on Friday cut the credit rating of Belgium with a negative outlook, his pointing to fears of a worsening debt crisis and the recession could undermine the commitment to reform.
European Summit
It meets in Brussels today, EU leaders to sign a permanent fund to save for the euro zone is expected to agree to the terms of the Treaty of financial stresses budget rules to national legislation.
It is assumed that the summit meeting will focus on providing jobs and growth, with the aspiration of leaders to reduce the emphasis on austerity budget that is unpopular politically.
It is expected that the summit meeting that up to twenty billion euros in unused funds from the EU budget from 2007 to 2013 will be directed towards the provision of jobs, especially among young people, and a commitment to liberalization of bank lending to companies.
The leaders will sign a treaty set up what is known as the European stability mechanism, a Save the permanent size of five hundred billion euros due to start work in July next year before the date that was originally planned.
The Fund will replace the European stability mechanism known as the facilities of the European financial stability, a fund used to temporarily save the Earl Nada, Portugal and Greece will help in the program’s second save.

Source: Al-Jazeera

While the agreement is not signed by Germany, the Netherlands, Cyprus, Estonia and Slovakia. It is worth noticing however that the United States, Canada and South Korea had signed last year.

ACTA, is the product of four-year negotiations, which were kept secret. This year will be voted on by Parliament, allowing ISPs to monitor content and eventually lead to making everything censorshiped.

The vote resulted already mobilizing organizations for the protection of human rights and freedom of speech, which complain that the process is not conducted democratically.

The critics of SOPA, PIPA and ACTA including Wikipedia, AOL, the Foundation Creative Commons, eBay, the Electronic Frontier Foundation, Facebook, Google, the Human Rights Watch, the Internet Foundation, Kaspersky, Mozilla , Reporters Without Borders, Twitter and Yahoo.

Already many downloading sites has been eliminated by ACTA and SOPA. 2 examples are megaupload and filesonic.

Concluding, ACTA is a dangerous agreement, which could lead the internet, as we know it right now, chage forever.

1. What is ACTA?
2. Why you should be concerned?
3. What will happen if ACTA passes?
4. How can you help fighting ACTA?

What is ACTA?ACTA is short for Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement. It’s an agreement between developing countries, that would standardize intellectual property rights enforcement. In simple terms laws in those countries for intellectual property would be the same. So far US, Japan, part of EU, some other Asian countries has signed this agreement.Why you should be concerned?Although ACTA might seem an agreement that standardizes intellectual property rights, but it’s actually a dangerous agreement. The most worrying part is that it’s being passed without any knowledge given to the public. Also methods it suggests to enforce intellectual property rights are breaking on human rights. What that means, your Internet Service Provider(ISP) would be forced to track your traffic, that is what websites you visit, what kind of things you download and upload. They would watch your activity on-line all the time. What you would lose is privacy right. Your ISP could be forced to give information about your activity without warranty if you were suspected to infringe copyrights. Besides this governments and corporations could close down websites that they deem dangerous for their reputation under pretext of copyright infringement, simply media censorship.           Beside these dangers, there’s also a chance at loss of lives. This agreement makes it harder to produce generic medicine under pretext of copyright infringement.  That is not only would pharmaceutical companies could monopolize the market, but they also could make their own prices, in effect making it hard if not impossible to buy medicine for poor people.What will happen if ACTA passes?

First of all it would start with massive surveillance of Internet, in effect you’d lose all the little privacy you have. After that of course Internet would become  corporations controlled, that would make it impossible to talk against corporations and governments. In effect it would kill off net neutrality and free speech under pretext of copyright infringement. Second stage would be monopolization of medicine production, whilst setting their own price. This would make it much harder to get medicine to people in need as I said before. However the biggest concern is unnecessary and hurtful surveillance and killing of privacy. All in all most of the world would become one big Police state. How can you help fighting ACTA?There’s couple of things you can do to fight ACTA. First of all you could sign these two petitions:

1. Petition against ACTA for EU.
2. Petition against ACTA for EU second one.

If you’re from US you should sign this petition too.Petition for US against ACTA.

Second part would be passive protest. I’ll include a poster that talks about the passive protest.

Beside this you should inform your friends, family, relatives anyone you know about ACTA. Because this agreement is being done in a total secret, you should inform more people, so that we could have more supporters that could help us fight against oppression that this agreement possess.
If you want to read about ACTA in more detail use this link, it provides the overview of ACTA.Overview of ACTA.

I am enclosing this with image that pretty much sums up ACTA.

   In 2010, the United States of America has topped the list of powerful countries/regions, accounting for nearly 22% of global power. The US is followed by China (more than 12%), European Union( more than 16 percent), and less than five perfect each for Japan, Russia and Brazil.

     According to this international futures model, by the year 2025, the power of the US, Eu, Japan and Russia would decline that of China, India and Brazil would increase, even though there would be no change in this listing. By 2025, the US would still be the most powerful country of the world. but it would have a little 18% of the global power.

     The US would be closely followed by China (nearly 16%), European Union (14%) and India (10%). The report concludes that three effects of rapid globalisation are driving demands for more effective global governance – economic independence, the interconnected nature of the challenges on the international agenda, and interwoven domestic and foreign challenges.

You may also check:

Ricky Martin’s Plan to Marry His Gay Boyfriend Carlos Gonzalez Abella

Bring a Revolution in Your Life – Will There Actually be Something Called Revolution 2020?

The Worst Valentine’s Day Gift for Your Girlfriend

100 Things to Do Before You Die!

Rishi Kapoor Plays a Gay Role in Karan Johar’s Student of The Year

Music on the net as you can in this case legally – but also to download illegally.

Internet providers can not be forced to filter the content of their network traffic in order to prevent the illegal downloading of music files around. This was decided by the European Court of Justice (ECJ) in the case of a Belgian Internet provider. Such surveillance violates the EU directive on electronic commerce and is also incompatible with the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights.

ISPs may not therefore judged that the general monitoring obligations are imposed. In addition, should remain the right of free exchange of data maintained, the ECJ ruled. (Ref: C 70/10)

Such a review of all active data is tantamount to a “general surveillance” like that was incompatible with the EU directive on electronic commerce. Such a requirement would also lead to impairment of the entrepreneurial freedom of the provider, as it is a costly and set up his own cost monitoring system would have operated. In addition, the control is contrary to fundamental rights of the EU: the protection of personal data and disclosure of personal information.

In this case, the Belgian company had to exploitation of music copyrights, the Gema counterpart SABAM complained, because Internet users had downloaded music from the provider Scarlet, without paying for it. They used a so-called peer-to-peer program. This allows users to record directly connecting computers of other users to exchange data with them. The provider was therefore undertaken by a Belgian court to incorporate electronic barrier filter. Scarlet appealed.

Such filtering mechanisms are also discussed in Germany. They are possible without problems. The process used is called Deep Packet Inspection (DPI) and is used for example to detect and remove spam.

Access providers also want to use it to distinguish different content from each other and then to treat them differently. They argue that as video pages provided for so much traffic that would clog the pipes. Dpi means they could, it is claimed, forwarding and other important content preference slow.

But critics see this as a violation of several fundamental rights. Could then decide but each network operator, who can find out how. The free exchange of data is so vulnerable, not the so-called network neutrality preserved. The ECJ ruling confirms this argument.

Supporters of the far-right Jobbik party set fire to a European flag.

A large demonstration against the European Union and for the reigning Premier – there is something rare in Europe. On Saturday was just that in Budapest, 100,000 people demonstrated for their right-wing Prime Minister Viktor Orbán. “An appropriate response and powerful on the smear campaign by leftist forces,” it said in a statement to Members of European Parliament from the ruling Fidesz party. A few days later that Orbán then had to report to EU Commission President Barroso. If Western Europe, where the policy of the populist Orban criticized, that is a false picture of the country? What do people in Hungary, anyway?

The fact is that maintaining a remarkable number of Hungary, a diffuse but strong enemy, one that is marked by foreign domination by the EU, the IMF and the financial markets. Behind this are fears that go well in the Hungarian history and today mythicized reception. It also reflects a kind of overwhelmed by the everyday concerns of Hungary can answer with easy answers and clear front lines.

84 percent believe the country on a false path

The latest opinion polls, however, paint a different picture than the one from Saturday in Budapest. Orban was also equipped than 2010 hopefuls with a very strong majority, the agreement has been halved to his policies within eighteen months. 84 percent of the total population are of the opinion that the country is on the wrong path. The paradox is that this also include the figures for a large portion of those needs, which would always give the ruling party nor their voice. It also shows that the sense of reality in Hungary is large enough.

In the Sunday issue of the Ipsos institute would the ruling party Fidesz to 39 percent of the vote (2010: 54 percent), followed by the Socialists (MSZP) with 26 percent (20 percent). The far-right Jobbik with 22 percent of the MSZP close behind (17 percent). The data of other institutions to see something more Fidesz, MSZP and Jobbik par at around 20 percent. The really shocking figure is that currently almost two thirds of eligible voters did not want to vote. And just on the edge: With the new electoral law would Fidesz – with the same proportion of votes – not only to 67 percent, but even at 78 percent of the seats.

Orbán’s communication strategies

Prime Minister Orbán and his staff serve in government and party two completely different communication strategies. There is a kind of new speak with much Hungarian nationalist Budenzauber and a light version for abroad, mainly from the Blur, and concealment is appeasement.

Orban has made in the course of his conservative revolution, the announcement, “the IMF comes back, I’ll go.” Therefore, the justifications and be communicated so-called freedom struggle are so important for him inside. “We bow to the pressure, not the arguments,” he replied to the criticism from the EU Commission. A message not just for the electorate, but also his self-justification, his attempt to save face. New samples of this double game, we will see, the IMF should actually call for changes in the tax unit, one of the sacred cows of Orbánschen government policy.

Orbán can rely on a core constituency, recruited mainly from the better-earners, and he carried his corporatist policy-oriented clientele served and consistently increased. The mass of his supporters, however, provide rural people and workers and employees who were full of the economic and moral failure of the social-liberal governments predecessor’s nose. Orbán’s economic policies so far wayward will in future decide whether he can keep these voters. Polls say less and less, but the big demonstration showed that the mobilization still works very well.

Few problems for the opposition of the Orbán government. The socialists of the MSZP are now incapable of any kind of reorganization and to this day do not profess to own misconduct during her reign. Most opposition groups in Hungary simply lack an alternative plan. They know not what they should do with an achieved power. Orbán only have to worry about from the ever-resurgent far right, the Jobbik. In this environment, he tries to make people less extreme occurring and offers to take them politically. Playing with fire.

Misguided EU integration

Hungary has long been divided, the political, ideologically charged battle of the grave “Either – Or” is a hallmark of the political culture in Eastern Europe since the turn and a testament to the wrong priorities for the EU integration of these countries. The establishment and control of a single market, free movement of goods and capital enjoyed priority over the building of democratic structures and the development of civil society.

This primacy prevails today, blocking not only in Hungary but EU-wide solution ensuring the problems that have long since become systemic issues. It seems that many politicians in Europe to be quite right to remain in the categories of the Cold War and weiterzuzeichnen people’s problems as a left-right issue.

Orbán as a lesser evil

The majority of people in Hungary today is simply disappointed and it outweighs both the feeling that they have again made the wrong choice, as well as – even more crippling – insight, to have no choice at all. Orban in Hungary that also makes many things wrong, you can see very well, for example, you can feel it in your own wallet. One recognizes the profound system changes that will redound primarily to the benefit of the ruling party. Péter Kónya, ex-trade unionist and leader of the new movement Szolidaritás sees “a new existential angst” among the people caused by anti-social activities such as the flat tax was introduced prematurely and a growing disenfranchisement and disempowerment as the uniformity of democratic control authorities.

Only to show the people of Hungary is currently not a viable alternative. But supposedly they are faced with the choice to bow again to a “foreign” system that failed in the past and guilt for their plight, so the ruling Socialists at that time plus the EU and IMF. Or the policy of a true obsessive omnipotence, but to subjugate the national interests very strongly emphasizing the party and government. The latter seems the majority today, if not the better way to be the lesser evil yet. A defensive reaction against the “enemy country” is just still the greatest common denominator.

After the European Union, Britain and Australia’s turn to present sanctions ban oil imports from Iran. Media Reuters on Tuesday(24 / 1), proclaim, British Foreign Secretary, William Hague, the European Union to assess sanctions against Iran is a big step.”We support the actions taken in Brussels to Iran,” Hague said ata press conference in London, England.

Australia also said similar things with England. Australian Foreign Minister, Kevin Rudd, confirmed Australia will follow the European Union in imposing sanctions for Iran. ”I will confirm today that the Australian government officially and fully supports a variety of sanctions that have been announced in Brussels,” he said in London, England.
In addition to these two states, Israel had earlier welcomed the sanctions against Iran. Israel called the new sanctions as ”a stepin the right direction”

Image via Wikipedia

Voters gave the Croats the green light to their country to join the European Union in a referendum on Sunday. 

Official results showed the initial referendum, voters approved the Croats to join their country to the EU in 2013, said Electoral Commission official said that 67% agreed to become their country’s 28th member in the European Union after more than twenty years of Croatia’s secession from former Yugoslavia. 

He said Croatian President Ivo Josipovic “This was a very important day for Croatia, as well as the result of today’s resolution .. Select Croatia as a European.” 

And welcomed the Croatian Prime Minister Zoran Milanovic this result, which paves the way to the European Union next year, and considered the people’s vote as a historic decision and perhaps a turning point in the history of Croatia, as he put it. 

He also welcomed the President of the European Union and the European Commission’s decision yesterday to join the Croatian electorate bloc, and said the referendum is positive, “a clear reference to the South East Europe as a whole.” 

The head of the Union, Herman Van Rompuy in a joint statement with the Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso said: “This shows that the membership of the European Union within reach through the political courage and strong reforms.” 

“But this is a positive vote is good news for Croatia, but also for the region and for Europe .. EU membership will open new opportunities for the Croats and will help in securing stability and prosperity of their homeland.” 

The accession of the former Yugoslav state to the Union still needs to get the green light in the parliaments of Croatia and the 27 member states of the European Union. It is scheduled to Croatia to join the bloc in the first in July 2013. 
  

Source: Agencies