The officials, speaking on action of anonymity, said the virus aboriginal was developed during the George W. Bush administeringand was geared against damagingIran’s nuclear adequacy graduallywhile sowing abashing a allotmentof Iranian scientistsabout the could cause of mishaps at a nuclear plant.

The use of the cyberweapon — malware advised to access anddamage computer systems — wassupposed to accomplish the Iranians anticipate their engineers were butterfingers of active an accessory facility. “The abstraction was to cord it out as connected as possible,” one actor said. “If you had broad abolition appropriate away, again they about can amount out what happened, and it doesn’t attending like incompetence.” Even afterwards software-security companies apparent Stuxnet apart on the Internet in 2010, causing affair a allotment of U.S. officials, Obama secretly ordered the operation continued.

Overall, the advance destroyed about 1,000 of Iran’s 6,000 centrifuges — fast-spinning machines that adorn uranium. The Civic Aegis Agency (NSA) developed the cyberweapon with Israel’s help. White House admiral beneath to animadversion on the new abstracts about Stuxnet, and an administering agent denied the actual had been leaked for political advantage.

“It’s our view, as it is the appearance of everybody who handles classified information, that advice is classified for a reason: that it is kept secret,” agent columnist secretary Josh Earnest said. “It is advised not to be publicized because publicizing it would affectation a blackmail toour civic security.”

Started in 2006 as a way to accident centrifuges at Iran’s uranium-enrichment bulb in Natanz, the cyberweapon began to appearance furnishings in 2008, if centrifuges began spinning at faster-than-normal speeds until acute apparatus began to bastardize and break, participants said. U.S. admiral were anxious if aegis companies began advertisement on the analysis of the bastard in June 2010.

“It took us a little while to amount out” the virus had spread, although it was not damaging machines added than those at Natanz, an official said. Iran, which again has said itsnuclear affairs is alone for peaceful purposes, replaced the damaged machines and has connected to adorn uranium. Efforts are beneath way to decipherthe origins of addition awful affairs experts accept is allotment ofgovernment-sponsored cyber warfare and intelligence gathering. Again, Iran is the target. As the Los Angeles Times appear this week, experts at Russia’s Kaspersky Lab came beyond this malware while analytic for a villain dubbed theWiper. Flame, as it’s called, can archetype andsteal abstracts and audio files, about-face ona computer microphone and almanac all adjacent sounds, yieldawning shots, apprehend abstracts and emails, and abduction passwords and logins. The affairs can acquaint with computers in the around throughthe adulterated computer’s Bluetooth and locate them even after an Internet connection, said Vitaly Kamlyuk, a chief anti-virus able at Kaspersky.

“Many humans still anticipate thatcyber warfare is a allegory and a fantasy,” he said, “but as we arouse and abstraction one by onethe abundant apparatus and modules of this different program, we see that it is a absolute weapon of this absolute war that is already traveling on.”

Death of Osama-bin-laden increased the possibilities of death of these 2 one of the most vital peoples in the international politics. who played most vital role in the death of Osama.

Everything started with the humiliating incident of 9/11. The date which no one of us could ever forget and even we don’t want to forget that date which almost changed the face of the whole world.

The day we lost many lives. many lives which were related to our life. our close ones, our dear one’s. The world trade centre, the sould of the new york city, the two biggest , tallest towers, the Proud of the city. strucked brutally by two consecutive plane crashesh, planned by the Biggest Islamic militant group Al-qaeda.

The Masterminds behind this planned attack over United states of america were Osama-bin-laden and Aiman-al-zawahiri.

In respond to this attack the that time President of United states decided to vanish these militant groups from the world. As a result President George W. Bush went almost hulk by anger and decided to send army to afganistan to search these militants from where ever they are and kill them and complete their revenge and save our upcoming generation. In the same race of war he too his biggest enemy as under and gained a big fortune by killing him. And that was Saddam hussain. Bush took the revenge from the side of his father who lost badly by him.

These were the first two tales which gives us indications and possibilities which are so hyped that A big and huge Number of militants and peoples want to kill George W. Bush as revenge.

But soon the President George W. Bush lost his presidency and a new race begins.

The First black president in the history of United states of america. STAND FOR CHANGE.

Curiousity made him president or destiny or the heat of the international politics made him president no one could ever know why he selected as president.

But whatever happened was very important for everyone in this world. United states is something to the world, to the future of this world.

And yes that man changed many things. He was imposed with the terms like He is a muslim, yes he is a muslim but raised as a christian.

The work the job the task left by George W bush or if i can say the task the George bush was unable to do is done by this man BARACK OBAMA and the task was to kill Osama-bin-laden the name of terror.

On may 2, 2011 he got killed by the Navy SEAL.

And for sure there are 100 times more possibility than George bush that he will get killed someday for this by some angry militant. Or by an Israeli we can’t say.

- When he leaves office in 2016, he’ll probably start the lecture tour and become a statesman, like Carter and Clinton.

- Write another book, start a presidential library, probably inChicago, go on speaking tours, cut an album, golf…

- What all past Presidents do I guess. Make speeches and get paid for it. Bill Clinton has made a fortune.

- Since GW Bush has been out of office you rarely even hear of him making a speech. Bill Clinton has made 75 million so if Bush even made 15 million it is a drop in the bucket.

- A thousand dollars a handshake can add up as well.

- Well, if he wanted to make big money, he should follow in George W. Bushes footsteps, and go on the speaking circuit. Bush has made over $15 million giving speeches since he left office.

- It breaks down to $110,000 a speech. Not too shabby.

- Anyone, anywhere, can be a religious figure. I don’t think that Obama is interested in that, however. He will do what all ex Presidents do – open a library, make public appearances, give speeches.

- When he leaves office in 2016, he may go back to teaching. He taught Constitutional Law prior to politics.

or maybe like Bush, Almost immediately after leaving office he withdrew from the broader bully pulpit thatother former presidents, such as Jimmy Carter, have used to weigh in on matters of public import. But he also joined the storied ranks of former politicians who are now making money on the speaking circuit– and it’s paying off.

What about Your opinion?

No, that’s not a misprint and I’m not smoking anything illegal. In many ways the President and Osama are and have been quite dependent on each other and both of them have there own reasons for sending each other a special thank you card.

Let’s take a look from the President’s point of view. 

When the President first came to office, he was not very well liked as the latest White House resident. He had only been confirmed as the President due to a decision in the election by the Supreme Court. (In fact, since that Supreme Court decision, the vote count after-the-fact has shown that Al Gore may in fact have actually won the election.) Unfortunately, after Gore had officially conceded the election, there was no going back. 

In addition, after the election, Bush was so anti-Clinton, he ordered any projects that were started by the Clinton administration to either be cancelled or to be given the lowest priority. One of Clinton’s top projects at the time was the continued pursuit of Osama bin Laden and al Qaeda. However, Condoleezza Rice, Bush’s then National Security Advisor was told to not continue with that pursuit. If not for the 9/11 disaster in 2001, it’s hard to imagine exactly what kind of presidency George W would have had. In fact, most political historians seem to agree that without the terrorist attacks on the twin towers and the Pentagon, the eventual “War President”, George W Bush would most likely have been a one-term president, as was his father. 

After 9/11, President Bush’s popularity went to the highest level of his two terms. At that time, he and Rudy Giuliani were probably the most popular and recognized individuals in America and most of the free world. As horrible as 9/11 was, one would have to admit that both George W and Rudy owe their initial popularity and current notoriety to Osama bin Laden’s actions. 

One project that was a focus of George W, even before he became president, was the removal of the Iraq regime of Saddam Hussein. There have been a number of articles about how George W wanted to finish the job where his father left off by getting rid of Saddam. In one such interview, George W. is quoted as saying that if he ever had the “political capital” and popularity as his father had during the previous Gulf War, he would not waste it as George H.W. had done. George W. said he would spend it by going straight into Baghdad and rid the world of Saddam. Unfortunately, for a short time, Osama’s strike on American soil gave George W. that “political capital”. After the attack and a successful series of strikes on al Qaeda in Afghanistan (where he should have stayed.) George W. spent his remaining “capital” in selling the country, the congress and other countries on an illegal war in Iraq. To sum it up, Osama made George W. popular for just enough time that he could fulfill his goal of going after Saddam. There aren’t many single individuals in the world who could cause the world’s most powerful country to go to war, so I guess one could say Osama’s been a pretty good supporter of George W. Bush.

Now from Osama’s point of view, George W. Bush has been a gift from Allah. Osama can thank George W. for two major decisions that have allowed Osama to stay alive and to become one of the most famous and effective Muslim marketing and recruiting individuals in history.

First, by initially only sending a small strike force into Afghanistan, this allowed Osama to escape to the Tora Bora mountain region and to then slip away from the American troops trying to corner him in Afghanistan. George W. then decided to change his focus from finding Osama to going after Saddam. He subsequently also diverted the American military to concentrating on Iraq instead of where al Qaeda and Osama were headquartered in Afghanistan. This fulfilled two of Osama’s most critical requirements. It immediately took the focus off of the US military for finding Osama, which allowed him to stay alive and escape into the mountain regions of bordering Pakistan. It also gave Osama the greatest recruitment tool a radical Muslim could wish for at just the right time.

Osama had previously warned the Muslim world that the US would eventually use its military power to attack and occupy a Muslim country and that the US would then station military troops on sacred Muslim territory. (Remember, one of the reasons that Osama attacked America at home was because the US Military had stationed troops on sacred Muslim grounds in Saudi Arabia during the original Gulf War.) By attacking and occupying Iraq, President Bush confirmed Osama’s predictions which raised the aura of Osama even higher in the view of devout Muslims around the world. Since 2001, the US military has done a good job of dealing heavy blows to Osama’s radical al Qaeda military organization. But George W. has personally done more to promote Osama’s global radical Muslim marketing and recruiting efforts than any program or person in the world.

Actually, when you look at it from either the President or Osama’s point of view, they have been more than best friends. Their combined personal goals could only been achieved by the direct actions of both individuals.

Hamid Mir interviewing Osama bin Laden for Daily Pakistan in 1997 behind them on the wall is an AKS-74U carbine. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

George Bush message after the death of Osama bin Laden (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

President Obama, a noted golfer who has been spotted on courses many a Sunday afternoon accompanied by luminaries in his own circle of advisers as well as world leaders, has been criticized by some for indulging in what might be seen as a luxury form of recreation at a time when many Americans are struggling to survive.

Romney echoed some of this criticism at an earlier speaking engagement in Ohio. “I scratch my head at the capacity of the president to take four hours off on such a regular basis to go golfing,” the Repulican front-runner told WLW Radio. “I remember how the Democrats used to be so critical of George W. Bush for playing occasional golf. He doesn’t begin to play the kind of golf that Barack Obama has, but we don’t hear much about that from the mainstream media.”

So, is this a fair criticism of the President? One could certainly argue that the President has a uniquely stressful job that takes up almost all of his time, from before dawn until the late hours of the evening, and he should be allowed any indulgence that he can squeeze in when he gets the chance. We want our President to be well-rested and at his best to make difficult decisions that might impact all of us, not stressed-out and unable to function because he has been all work and no play for months on end. 

On the other hand, he certainly volunteered to be President, knowing full well the hours and stresses that would be placed upon him with such a huge responsibility resting on his shoulders. He’s being paid over $400,000 a year and lives rent-free in a manion complete with personal servants, bodygaurds, cooks, you name it. Maybe he shouldn’t take a vacation at all for the entire four years of his term!

It’s a tough issue, one without any easy answers (though you are sure to find an answer from anyone you ask as everyone seems to have an opinion on this. How many Americans can afford to golf even once a year, let alone nearly every weekend as Obama has done as president? And will this perception that he is enjoying the perks of the office a bit too much hurt Obama’s re-election chances? We will find out soon enough as the race heats up along with the summer. 

            One week is the United States-led coalition forces bombarded the Iraqi move. On the other hand the military forces and the Iraqi people struggling desperately to defend every inch of their land. There was no sign of the battle will end, here and there in the anti-war demonstrations continue, the weekend is not the time for the holidays but now demonstrating. Many are pessimistic that this war would end soon, the world’s peace activists alleged that the majority of victims of Gulf War II, this volume is that most of the civil society are children and women, although the official number of casualties of this war has not been clearly revealed, but most no indication in that direction is quite large. We can see from the station broadcasts several international and national television that shows the number of civilian casualties.

            The birth of the human costs of war is indeed remarkable, but the threat of death, hunger, infectious diseases, there is a great danger that now threatens the world, the growing passion for hating each other. The opinions expressed Samuel Huntington in the Class of Civilization as a justification of war is raging. World again will be in blocks like the cold war, only the blocks are formed not because of ideological factors but rather on factors that embraced civilization. West on the one hand and Islam on the other hand according to Huntington will be two future world power shaft. Let Huntington’s thesis would have proof through the course of history, which is much more important now is to build a state that can accelerate the end of the war.

            This human tragedy must end soon, if not to be very fatal consequences for humanity, to do an analysis as to what end this war, it is necessary to first explain some of the realities of the prefix. The reality of this prefix will be used to build assumptions prospects for peace.

First, there are interesting things to learn prajurut Bush delivered a captive U.S. soldiers Iraq Iraqi television broadcast. Bush immediately accused Iraq violated the Geneva Conventions of 1950 (Kompas, March 25, 2003), but whether Bush recalled that he also had been violated in committing to a joint session of the UN, which wants the war inevitable. But Bush chose the path unilaterar. On the other hand, Saddam Hussein shouted at the people and soldiers that they would soon win the war (compass, March 25, 2003). This human tragedy signals the world that the international perdamaiaan agencies (UN) loss of function or in other words, the UN is no longer a sacred world body, the UN has been dying. This is the first condition.

Second, the U.S. was invited to parties who can not compromise the complete disarmament of Iraq’s dangerous, what with the United Nations inspections of possible weapons of mass destruction in Iraq was the U.S. are ignored, regardless of whether the U.S. has a special interest in this mission, we can The U.S. did not heed calls to see the world through the United Nations, until shortly before the war began the United States fully supported only three countries, Spain, Australia and the UK. Three countries were indeed legitimate, if we count back then there is still Israel, Kuwait, Turkey, Japan and some other countries that support both directly and discreetly. On the other hand the U.S. opposed to tens or even hundreds of other countries, especially countries that joined the Arab league and non-aligned movement. Then we can say the feeling just because (dumeh) U.S. is so powerful, far-mentangannya kementang covered with the title as the guardian of human rights (human rights), but their aggression into Iraq without a clear cause analysis confirm that the U.S. is the country that arbitrary treatment. This is the reality of the second prefix.

Third, attempts by certain parties in both global and local scale (at the level of the countries), which directs public opinion that this dispute is the conflict between religion (civilization), is a truth that Iraq is a Muslim country and incidentally bependuduk also Iraq in the construction history of Islam has a strong significance, until when Iraq came under fire for no reason than the U.S., the world’s Muslims psychological suffering. This is evident from the many acts of solidarity of Muslims in many countries. But, there’s no reason to declare the Iraq war as a conflict between religions (civilization). This is the reality of the third prefix.

Fourth, there is a real condition but the reality is often considered just a rumor, no other condition is that this war happened over a factor due to the displeasure of George W. Bush against Saddam Hussein. If we want to look at many indicators that indicate this, among other Bush ultimatum to Saddam to leave Iraq with his son and the ultimatum was answered firmly by Saddam that he would not leave Iraq, which eventually became the trigger conditions of the war, then the issue The U.S. has prepared mention transfer of power from the hands of Saddam, the two issues is enough to indicate that Bush and the U.S. generally do not like Saddam ruled Iraq. This reality is the fourth prefix.

Countdown Toward Peace

            Of the three initial reality is we can reflect on what has been done to prevent world war, which in turn can be used as the basis in determining a strategy for peace.

            The first reflection, moving from the reality of the first prefix, where the formal institutions of the world no longer has the urgency in preventing open conflict, it may be too soft due to the United Nations in controlling the condition of a potential conflict with the country’s main actors, tenderness is more so when the United Nations faces a state actor major powers, especially the veto. Because both could be due to less dependency on the United Nations of the world’s nations, especially the financial concerns and the third because it is possible the consolidation of pro-peace forces in the UN did not go well.

            Causality of the above conditions, it is only natural that when the United Nations to lose the urgency of a function in maintaining world peace. Therefore in the short-term perspective needs to be done is to give the UN harsh sanctions against the aggressor state, at least as hard as ever issued by the UN sanctions on Iraq, when Iraq menginfasi Kuwait. These sanctions are intended to lift the image in the eyes of the UN member states are already upset with the United Nations. Furthermore, the UN should strive stimulates problem-solving process regarding Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction back on track where full coordination in the hands of the UN security council.

            Then the long-term perspective, taking into account the history of the United Nations and Security Council functions which have a bias between the functions of maintaining world peace and protect the interests of major powers, especially U.S. and UK. Thus, it is necessary rethinking of the veto power that had been owned by five countries (U.S., China, Russia, Britain and France), and analyze the possibility ditambahnya UNSC non-permanent members. Both the above proposals are fully associated with feelings of equality (equality) in the UNSC.

            The second reflection, moving from the condition that the United States and Iraq involving compromised difficult international suspicions about the existence of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, then there are two threads that can be drawn. First, Iraq must honestly and earnestly to give opportunity to the international world to prove that the accusations leveled against them is not true, if it turns out Iraq did not heed this instruction so lawful in Iraq before attacking, if later in Iraq found weapons of mass destruction, Iraq must willing to destroy such weapons. On the other hand, as we know the United States is driving the issue of weapons of mass destruction, then ASpun must be pressed to allow the inspection process carried out systematically and objectively, if it is not honored by the UN should impose sanctions on the U.S. firm.

            Then the problem, the above matters can only be implemented if the UN is powerless powerful as today, the thing to do is consolidate all pro-peace forces around the world, to make a back up UN efforts systematically. A necessity, that the collectivity of nations in the world will produce a meaningful thing for world peace.

              The third reflection, moving from the condition that there are those who direct the war issue is an issue of inter-religious konfli (civilization), it must be a systematic effort by all countries in the world to explain to the people in each country that the war in Iraq is not a war between religion, streamlining measures public opinion is very important, in order to dispel the possibility of wider conflict.

            The fourth reflection, when konlik Iraq is largely due to individual factors (big-man theory) it is necessary to the completion of the individual approaches as well. Bush and Saddam as the main actor is the subject matter, the international community need to be able to use a mediator for Bush and Saddam to negotiate with each other the things that led to Bush (the U.S. generally) do not like Saddam. It is not easy, but again these efforts remain in the United Nations through the pressure of strict sanctions.

            Perdamaiaan future of the Iraqi crisis is largely determined by how one of the UN Security Council to revitalize the functions and roles, as well as how the consolidation of pro-peace forces in the world to strengthen the collectivity to pressure the parties to the conflict now.

            Reality is not always in line with expectations, but certainly not without hope of any improvement, therefore the world in the midst of tremendous turmoil, energy must continue to spread hope, one of the Iraqi crisis is a test of commitment with the countries of the world for humanity. Now let’s count down to peace.

46% of respondents in 136 countries in 2011 found that the work of Obama as U.S. leader is positive, which is similar to that recorded in 2010 (47%) in a survey conducted in 116 countries, according to the Gallup poll and Meridian international Center NGO, told AFP.

In the 116 countries where it was made the 2010 survey, the rate of good opinion of the Obama administration declined to 43%, suggesting that “America has lost its prestige,” says Gallup in a statement.

In 2008, during his last year in office, former President George W. Bush won 34% support, the same data that reached disapproval.

42% of Europeans considered positive of Obama in 2011, compared with 45% in 2010.

In the Americas, U.S. President got a 40% support, while in 2010 it reached 46% favorable rating and 53% in 2009.

In Asia, 39% of respondents approved of his management, two points less than in 2010.

The statement disclosed Nazir Ahmed in Haripur, Pakistan, last week in retaliation for the U.S. government offers a reward offer of U.S. $ 10 million or around Rp 91 billion for the Hafiz Muhammad Saeed caught, led Laskhar e Tayyiba. U.S. citizens of Pakistan that claimed 2008 as the mastermind behind the terrorist attacks in Mumbai, India.

Nazir Ahmed response action gets hard. British Labour Party Pakistan off from the board membership, as it is considered too daring to challenge the U.S.. “We have temporarily disabled Ahmed membership until he finished questioning. If the statement is true and serious, we will act firmly,” said a spokesman for the Labour Party, as reported by AFP on Monday (16/4).

During her time as a member of British House of Lords, Nazir Ahmed was often a controversial figure. He was the organizer of the book launch at the House of Lords in 2005 upon the work of the controversial writer from Sweden, Israel Shamir, a known anti-Israel and Jewish. In addition, Ahmed is also very brave against the British government’s decision to give Salman Rushdie for his nobility in 2007. For Ahmed, Rushdie did not deserve the title because it has tarnished Islam, through the book The Satanic Verses

The last victory was clear Romney wins, the primaries are expected to run. While, according to Father George HW Bush’s brother Jeb is already the second Romney has pledged his support to George W. has passed into political exile.

He had “finished at peace with the policy,” says his former adviser Mark McKinnon to the U.S. daily newspaper Politico. “He enjoys his life in Texas and have not had before to pledge his support to anybody,” a former spokesman is quoted anonymously. “He has no more need to be in the spotlight. He is currently focused entirely on the Bush Center ‘, another former, an anonymous employee tells Politico. “Believe me, many candidates would love to be supported by him,” said Mike Leavitt, former governor of Utah and Minister of Health in the Bush era. The decision not to interfere in the politics of the presidency, had already met Bush during his term of office: “There is no strategic tricks behind it, that’s a vintage George W. Bush, who has made a decision,” says Leavitt.

“Bush has undermined the party”

There are other reasons: to keep the Republican George W. Bush purposely at a distance. Bush does not have the political chapter, but the party slammed the Bush chapter. Because of the 43rd President of the United States has handed his successor a huge pile of problems. The war in Afghanistan is steadily losing support in the population. 40 percent of Americans do, according to the latest survey, Bush for the economic malaise in the country. The Tea Party and had with her aggressive tone of the collection held by Bush’s political life. A support George Bush could do more harm than they could do good, writes Politico. Edge help from George W. could very well mean a shot in the foot – even if no one speaks officially, writes Politico.

The reason lies in the last presidential election in 2008: “In reality, Obama has beaten then Bush, not McCain,” says an anonymous quoted, senior representatives of the Grand Old Party. “In the eyes of the Republican Bush has undermined the party. You could complain to no longer to be the adults in the political scene, who can take responsibility for a balanced budget.” The wars in Iraq and Afghanistan have battered the image even more.

Survey to support statements

This would support Bush’s declaration of a major influence on the voting behavior of the Republican electorate. A survey of mid-January, the influence of prominent Republicans – George W. Bush, Sarah Palin, John McCain, Donald Trump, Herman Cain and Michele Bachmann – is to show the respective religious representative or governor, occupied 28 percent would be a candidate rather choose, if Bush supports him officially. He is followed with 23 percent of Alaska’s former governor Palin. The two have recorded also the least negative impact of its own: Eleven percent said they would not support a candidate if Bush were to place himself at his side. 15 percent when Palin takes a stand.

The former First Lady Barbara Bush called the beginning of May, the primaries to the presidential election as “the worst campaign I’ve ever seen in my life.” “I hate that people think that compromise is a dirty word – a compromise is not a dirty word”