Some perspective.

Historians regard Menes as the first pharaoh and founder of the first dynasty of ancient Egypt. A lot has been written about him and his reign. But history is never written in stone. It is never written with absolute finality.

An essay about the question "Is complete historical accuracy possible?".

In 390 AD an Egyptian king banned this practice of worshiping of cats. People of Egypt do not worship a cat at present. The eastern part of India has never experienced any hype about worshiping of cats although this animal is considered as a goddess still by grandmothers and mothers in general.

Many people have written about whether the actions, habits, or existence of a Ruler is good for the people who he rules. I am looking at the issue in a very different direction: whether being in authority is good for a person who attains that power, or if it is bad for him. I do this by looking at the carriers and personalities of the Emperors of Persia as depicted in The Histories by Herodotus. I realize that many people question the accuracy of Herodotus descriptions, but that is not relevant to my paper. I merely need some body of description which I can start with in the journey of analysis.

Most of us consider knowledge to be desired; a good thing to acquire. Yet there are situations according to some of the “great minds” of the world when knowledge is not beneficial.

Girl power is not just a recent phenomenon for there are many women who have exerted and proved themselves in the male-dominated world of politics. Looking back into history, female absolute rulers are quite few in number when compared to male rulers.