Socyberty » liberty

Head and Tail Game

Wed, 15 Feb 2012 12:33:21 +0000

Head and Tail games are all over the internet

They offer a huge earn if you win.
I saw 210%-300%. That means if you bet $2 you can win $4.2-$6. It’s better, than the average 200%.

They use LibertyReserve, an online bank. LibertyReserve is very safe.
There is no sending fee, just receiving, it’s often $0.01.

They offer Referral comission. It’s often 10%-20%. I saw a page with 40% but I don’t know that’s true or not.
So, if you refer somebody to play. You will get his/her bet’s 20% in this situation (image). So if he/she bets $1, you will get $0.2 to your LibertyReserve, instantly. They can win or lose, you will get that money.

Jackpot

A page says: “If you win and last 2 digit of your batch are the same as the second one you’ll win JACKPOT”
For this, you have to bet at least $4.
There is always a Batch number which is generated by LibertyReserve and if you’re lucky, you can win that jackpot too.

It’s like red and black game in roulette but I think you have more chance in this game and here you can win more money. (210%-300%)

There is No “Fair Economy”, Mr Barack Hussein Obama

Wed, 25 Jan 2012 22:38:36 +0000

Bad attitude is something that requires times to learn. Once learned bad attitude is hard to get rid off. Today, most of the conditions in society are the direct result of bad attitude.

Give yourself this test. Count how many times since you woke up today, you criticized someone or something with your inside voice. The reason you spoke critical of people or systems is because your society has trained you to have a bad attitude.

Unfortunately, society suffers greatly when a large number of people in its group practice bad attitude. People with bad attitude do not invest in their society. These people also blame everyone else and use this blame to justify not voting.

This political appears more contentious than any other I have observed. I have even stop listening to Laura Ingraham, Rush Limbaugh, and Shaun Hannity. I wrote my explanation as just not wanting to have anything to do with people who do not understand how to make good choices.

In addition, I am at this moment in my life building my social-political ideology. This ideology will incorporate my mental health philosophy, my life philosophy, my political philosophy, and my perspective on faith and religion.

You know being liked by other people is not good, if you have to lower your standards. A few days ago I tried to explain to a person why it is better to let individuals be the innovators and creators instead of government.

This person did not get it. I think he is an idiot. I do not want anything to do with idiots. I fear a society led by arrogant people who have studied nothing, but think they are world class intellectuals.

Currently, Mr. Obama is trying again his “fair economy” initiative. When the Russians told everyone were to work and were to live us free people called it Communism.

There is no fair economy. In life there will be people who manage their lives well and people who do not manage their lives well. My simple formula for personal success is accepting reality, being grateful for what you have, earning enough for the basic needs, and friends and family.

To many people are dreamers. Their life disillusionment comes from not having the life they think they are owed. Great amounts of money are not required to meet my definition of personal success.

Therefore, what are people crying about in relation to government and politics. The economic crisis that begun on October 2007 was a rude awakening to many. However, I believe it was necessary.

We were living without any true concept of life. Materialism and carnal cravings were directing our lives.

Hence, a society of hate, animosity, and rage has been building for close to 15 years. A long time ago I coined the phrase “money sick”. “Money sick” is when a person thoughts of spending money or making money lead to a mental shut down, such as anxiety overload. People believe that if they just make more money everything will be alright. Their lack of confidence in themselves or systems leads to hate, animosity, and rage towards other people.

A society with a large portion of its members hating, with animosity, and rage is a dangerous society. I just went out to take care of some business. I received a smear from two people and a women took a wide right turn in her car almost hitting me. These are the people in our society.

Everyday they recruit more people to be negative, hateful, and violent. However, let me be clear. I do not believe that the majority can be saved from their horrible nature.

I am convinced that a small majority will listen to what I am writing about, recognize their own bad behaviors, and work at having a great life. My articles are for these few individuals.

It is wrong to be hating someone for no reason other than that is what a negative, critical, vulgar, and hateful society has thought us. Everyone of us can contribute to functioning society or dysfunctional society. Our smears, criticism, vulgarity, and rage do influence the problems in our society.

Let us look at Mr. Barack Hussein Obama. How did Mr. Hussein come to his political philosophy? America was built on the idea that the individual would be the one to take risks, work for success, and reap the rewards from his or her hard labor. Mr. Obama appears to believe that something other then hard work and sacrifice lead to personal success.

Freedom and liberty are absolutely essential for the previous recipe to work. No company forces people to buy their services and/or products. Major corporations have money because people willingly bought their stuff. Having the freedom to work means any person can earn wealth.

Now, let us look taxes people and companies pay. Companies pay property taxes, state sales taxes, and income taxes. High income individuals pay property taxes, state sales taxes, and income taxes.

Wealth is money already earned. When it was earned the individual paid federal and state income taxes. As wealth a person only needs to pay taxes on the interest from investments. If it is put in an interest earning savings or checking account, taxes are paid on the interest earned, not the whole amount invested. Yes, I know that not all states have an income tax.

Over regulation of business stifles personal wealth. I was looking at how to get a real estate license in Texas on the internet. I determined that the state requirements are to excessive. The part I did not like is having to work under some one with a real estate license before I would be allowed to work on my own.

Therefore, Obama’s ideas on economic freedom violate the freedom and liberties of individuals. People can criticize Steve Jobs and Bill Gates. However, their inventions have had great impact on the human race. Neither individual previously named was a government worker nor restricted from innovation and creativity.

Now, I am not going to say that all government workers suffer from a lack of innovation and creativity. However, through out human history it has been people free to think and free to create who have created valuable products and services.

These captains of industry do not just profiteer. They pay their taxes. Most successful individuals and companies have charities they support. In addition, they create jobs.

Today’s, current American economy is due to Mr Barack Hussein Obama spending over 5.5 trillion dollars in the last three years. Mr Hussein’s 800 billion stimulus package was a great failure. Hussein’s National Healthcare has created cost to individuals and companies. Business are afraid of Mr Hussein’s political initiatives and will not reinvest in their businesses. In addition, increased regulation is deterring job creating.

Therefore, the one who is creating an unfair economy is Mr. Hussein. He is also contributing to the bad attitude of people who are becoming their own worse enemies. No one else is responsible for our lives, but us. Again, I state that it is our responsibility to find our own personal success. Hating companies and/or rich people is not going to make any of us more successful.

The majority in society may continue to get angrier and more dangerous. However, rational and reasonable people can use their positive perspective and realistic perspective to manage their life.

In addition, just to put things in perspective. While I was writing this article I saw a program that had a teen age boy diagnosed with leukemia.

Freedom of Speech – Are We Demanding Too Much?

Sat, 21 Jan 2012 17:14:21 +0000

Freedom Of Speech – Are We Demanding Too Much?

Freedom of speech is a basis human right. People have fought and died for the right to free speech. However as we begin our journey through the 21st century – which incidentally is the most selfish period of history ever – we have to ask, how much freedom do we really need?

I am all for freedom, liberty and the rest of the trendy bollocks that litters Twitter and all the other social media.

What people fail to see is that the greedy west is on a slide into anarchy – which is great if we take it all the way. We can’t have a partial anarchy.

You are probably wondering what I am taking about – I will explain.

Those of us who are fortunate enough to live in a fair democratic society (Stop laughing) have a system in place to have ones voice heard and represented.

In a democracy, we elected others to be our voice. To champion our causes and to ensure that society lives in safety. The elected are also there to make the decisions we are unable to or don’t wish to. This is the basis for democracy.

Now in theory if we as a collective don’t like something or want change, then we press our politicians to enact this change. Sometimes we have to come out and remind them now and again that they are our representatives. That is the nature of democracy.

Now back to my initial point. At this time of our history we want it all. We want changes to be made yesterday, bypassing the democratic process that our ancestors fought and died for. The people want some form of an anarchic/democracy hybrid, which doesn’t work. It scares the politicians and it silences the smaller voices. No longer will a politician strive to make the world a better place or make an unpopular decision for the greater good without fear of upsetting the large vocal majority.

We have to decide what we want – total anarchy where it will become everyone for themselves or are we going to stick with democracy and use the system correctly, thus having some clarity amidst the online chaos of wannabe politicians.

Also if we stop trying to change the world via our Twitter accounts, we can then concentrate and ensure that the elected are doing things for us instead of the corporate world.

Rant over.

The United States of America Did Not Enjoy Liberty Until After The Civil War

Wed, 04 Jan 2012 22:56:12 +0000

Since the arrival of the first shipload of colonists to America, the people of the colonies and eventually states, tried to make their living area the best they could. To aid in the effort, the colonists eventually set up a government with three main branches and many levels of power, their job was to secure liberty for the country which would eventually become the United States of America. After the bad experience of colonial relations with the British, the forming of a new government, and even a civil war; the question is: Did the people of the country which would eventually become the United States of America secure and enjoy the blessings of liberty up to and through the civil war? Liberty is to be able to pursue a goal or an element which will better one’s life or a group of lives. The general opinion of Americans today is that liberty, following this definition, was not secured and enjoyed for the entire time of the country up to and during the civil war.

Image by ♪_Lisa_♪ via Flickr

Britain’s Second Bad Decision Against America

Wed, 04 Jan 2012 22:55:56 +0000

By having less money, the colonists could not expand their business or do many of the things which they enjoyed. Another way the colonists had their liberty restricted was that they weren’t allowed to settle past the Appalachian Mountains. The British said it would anger the Native Americans and could potentially start a war. It ends up that the French and Indian War happened for seven years and most of the soldiers were colonists. After winning the war against France and the Native Americans, the British still did not let the colonists expand; this is a huge violation of what the constitution of America is now based on: life, liberty, and property. This did not secure liberty for the colonists because they were not allowed to settle, to expand their businesses or their homes and make themselves have a better life; they weren’t allowed to pursue happiness.

Image via Wikipedia

The South’s One Huge Mistake When Seceding From The Union

Wed, 04 Jan 2012 22:55:01 +0000

Leaving the union did not secure liberty for either side because there was a war going. This war only caused lives to be lost and money to be spent, along with properties being damaged, which violates the constitution, even if seceding doesn’t do that itself. These things violate two of the three main points of liberty on the constitution. Lives were lost, which violated the life point, and properties were damaged which violated the property point. With all of this going on, there was one more major action which violated the constitution: the Emancipation Proclamation. This was a statement by the current president of the time, President Lincoln, which said that slaves in rebelling states were freed, this helped the North in the war because slaves would leave the South and join the north or the Southern states would surrender and keep their slaves. As far as a war effort goes, it is very unconstitutional; again it violates the people’s right to keep property, which is a very big deal. Fortunately for Lincoln, the people saw slaves being freed as a good thing, they were free from their torturous Southern owners and they could enjoy a more free life.

Image via Wikipedia

The Meaning of Liberty

Wed, 04 Jan 2012 22:53:33 +0000

The meaning of liberty today, in the eyes of the people of America, is to be able to pursue a goal or an element which will better one’s life or a group of lives. Overall, following this definition, liberty was only secured for a small fraction of the total time since America was inhabited by colonists up to the civil war. In the general opinion of Americans today, while the colonists were in relations with Britain and while engaged in the civil war, the blessings of liberty were not secured, but while setting up a new government and electing the first few presidents, liberty was able to be secured and enjoyed successfully. This took a lot of thought and a lot of processing too, so I hope you will comment on this article because it helps me stay motivated, and I like it when people click the like button on my articles too.

Image by 0ccam via Flickr

nks!

What The South Failed to Consider When Seceding: Liberty and The Constitution

Wed, 04 Jan 2012 22:52:36 +0000

The period when the indecision caused by slavery was raging all around America was one where liberty was not secured at all. According to the constitution, people had the right to property, and slaves were considered property at the time when it was written. In order to stall some of the slavery debates, many compromises were created in the congress, such as the Missouri Compromise of 1820. This compromise stated that Maine would become a free state if Missouri became a slave state. The compromise also stated that there would be a line drawn to avoid all further confusion about where slave states would be; this line was at 36 degrees North and 30 minutes West. This line drawn did not secure liberty in the eyes of many people today. It restricted people from owning their slave property above a certain point in America, which is unconstitutional, because the constitution says that people have a right to property. After much more tension and many more years, the South decided to secede. After the south seceded, the North decided to go to war with the states which left to get them back in the union.

Image via Wikipedia

Another Way George Washington Saved America’s Liberty

Wed, 04 Jan 2012 22:52:00 +0000

Since Washington was the first president of the United States, he needed to set the example for how it should be done in the future, but while doing that, he also needed to interpret laws of the constitution himself, because the Supreme Court had not taken any actions yet. During this time period, Washington did the best that he possibly could to please everybody in the United States. During this time, he also secured liberty by providing the country with a future example of how the presidency is supposed to be handled which helps future presidents even today. In his efforts to please many people, he provided numerous opportunities to multitudes of people to enjoy liberty while keeping the country in control. The last thing in the time period of the first few presidencies to secure liberty was the National Bank. This bank gave people not only the option to save their money, but to also invest in their businesses and country for financial growth. Having more money meant that people could create a larger business or be able to enjoy the blessings of liberty such as owning property.

Image via Wikipedia

Give Me Liberty

Fri, 23 Dec 2011 20:47:47 +0000

What does liberty mean to you? This particular word has multiple meanings to every person, we all have our own view of liberty. However does having liberty give you the right to do as you please? This comes as a question of morality. Do you have morals or don’t you? Morals is defined again by ever person’s own interpretation of what moral means. To me liberty means I can walk down the street smoke a cigarette, go to strip clubs if I want to, have a beer, own a house, operate my own business be as successful as I want with no limits to my own imagination. However there are people out there always trying to enforce their will upon us. Whether through the passages of laws or through fear. Liberty being encroached upon stands strong against the encroaches; however liberty cannot stand alone without the guidance of true patriots that will stand and question what “authority” states. You the reader must look within yourself and define what liberty is to you. Being an American is an advanced state of citizenship, you must be willing to never back down or shrink away from what challenges you. Do you have a settled content spirit? Are you willing to give up your right to challenge authority?

Are you ready to be civilly disobedient to your government and stand tall and strong against the force they will levy upon you. Are you ready to see the military patrolling your streets in your neighborhood? Harassing your family. Harassing your friends? Interfering in your life, allowing them inside your home without warrants or reason because they deem you a threat to their power structure? What are you willing to fight and sacrifice? Where will you stand when they come in and sweep up every person you have known and loved? Right now if you are standing on the sidelines waiting for the hammer to fall you are adding to their power. However if you are standing in the game waiting for the ball you are part of a resistance that is growing in number and strength. I am not and do not advocate violence. I do advocate being peaceful and civilly disobedient to the power structure of your county.