“Anarchy Ready” on a governmental scale is accomplished through subterfuge. History states the infected organizations were prepared to be unprepared. You may think it to be a humorous statement, but precariousness is a social function of all developing predatory species. Every mammal has an instinct for dominance. This places procreation high on their lists. Prostitution is an acceptable profession in approximately 85% of the world, but this attitude is allowing female slave labor by accepted social cognition. Supplying this market is against the universally felt laws of abduction and infidelity. They are preventable, but they are very difficult to stop through enforcement. The logic behind government structures are to ensure order through law enforcement. Yet, many officials are bribed to divert their attentions.

People with national doubts are a people without a country. It can be said governments collapse when they lose the support of their people. Capitalism is in every country feeding the deadly sins of Vanity, Gluttony, and Lust. They are conditions of the animal. To satisfy the beast is to satisfy these human conditions. It is human instinct manipulating people’s cognizance of war, paranoia, and deceit. It is done for personal gain. Methodology is a plan and planning works in conspiracy by corrupt individuals. They take from the weak, while stirring countries into Economic Recessions.

Multiple Nations are affected, the so called Big Conspiracy Theorists can’t be said to have mental health issues or suffer from paranoid delusions when there are multiple states and multiple agencies involved. Because there are so many institutions affected a coincidence theory is a no sell. Yeah right, it is a coincidence in hundreds of countries within moments? That is far too many countries and governmental agencies to allow thousands of coincidences happening at the same time. Their functions are to control money systems within a given set of jurisprudence. Financial Institutions are the focus and each country’s people. The billions are the affected. The poorer (the weak) are the most affected. Looking closer at the Banking Problems there were problems in every bank across the globe. The New World Order offerings of an United Continental coin. Did the NWO followers cause of the world recession? George W. Bush follows dad’s world police force notions, while not enforcing laws at home. The G-7 monetary group was fashioned after the “Seven Headed Biblical Beast” to support The New World Order. The New World Order then must be “The Second Roman Empire”indicating rules and the laws weren’t enforced on a Global Scale. Their are too many coincidences to just be coincidences.

Take a lesson from current happenings. Terrorist place suicide bombers in several areas of the city to explode within seconds of each other. Area law enforcement is spread thin when the car bomb takes out a shopping area with five thousand possible pro-government innocents. They were people living normally doing daily chores. Anyone may ask why things happen, but you must understand by removing the multitudes of eyes on the streets, it tends to keep mouths shut. This makes illicit movements more difficult to discover.

I’m going to teach you how to scientifically interpret a dream by showing you a few important techniques of the secret unconscious language in dreams.

1. The first technique used by the unconscious mind is the use of dream symbols in order to give you important messages (which are quite long) in a compact form.

For example, the appearance of the snake in a dream already gives you a very important message by itself. The snake is showing you that you will suffer because you are making a serious mistake, and you must stop making it. Something very unpleasant in your daily life will oblige you to stop making this mistake forever.

If you are intelligent, you will think about your daily life and understand what mistake you are making. Then, you’ll stop making it, before being punished by the consequences of your negligence.

You’ll also care about learning the dream language and translating all the details of your dream. The wise unconscious mind will show you how to avoid suffering. You only have to follow the unconscious guidance in your dreams in order to find solutions to all problems.

2. The second technique used by the unconscious mind is the formation of a story with a double meaning in a dream. The dream scenes follow a different logic but they seem to follow the logic of your conscience.

Your conscience ignores the dream language the same way that your anti-conscience ignores it, but you can learn how to understand the unconscious language in your dreams thanks to Carl Jung’s method of dream interpretation and thanks to my simplifications. Ancient civilizations could understand the meaning of their dreams before Jung’s discoveries. The dream language is based on sanctity.

Therefore, in order to understand the meaning of dreams you must follow the unconscious logic, besides learning the meaning of the most important dream symbols, like the snake. This is necessary because the unconscious mind has to hide the information it is giving to your human conscience from your evil anti-conscience.

The double meaning of the dream story is based on the creation of a story that seems to fit into your daily reality and belong to the logic of your human conscience. This first version of the story is a covering that misleads your anti-conscience.

At the same time, the unconscious mind creates a second version of the same story behind the first one, which you can understand when you translate the symbolic meaning of the dream images, while following the unconscious logic.

For example, you are in a farm when you see a snake in a dream. Then, the dream scene changes, and you see yourself climbing a mountain. The first, apparent dream story is a description of what happens to you while you are outdoors.

However, the second version of the dream story is the most important one because it reveals the real meaning of this dream. By learning the second version of this story you will understand the hidden unconscious messages.

When you climb a mountain in dreams, this means that you are accepting to face an important life challenge that will help you evolve.

You have to relate this information to the first dream image, so that you may understand the unconscious messages.

The snake represents a bad event that will put an end to one of your mistakes. Since you saw that you were climbing a mountain after seeing the snake, this means that you have to face an important life challenge in order to avoid passing through a bitter experience that will put and end to a serious mistake. This is the real meaning of this dream.

3. The third technique used by the unconscious mind is to link all the dream images even though they seem to be unrelated according to the logic followed by our conscience. The unconscious mind uses each dream image in order to give you an important message, and all dream images together give you a general important message.

The unconscious mind gives you information about all dangers, in order to help you prevent what is bad. The value of the unconscious messages in your dreams is basically protective.

When you’ll manage to eliminate your anti-conscience and have a clear mind, the dream messages will help you evolve. You won’t need to have warnings about your anti-conscience’s interference. This means that you won’t have nightmares or recurring dreams. Your dreams will give you important lessons and reflect future predictions. You will have the chance to prepare the future results you desire and attain higher levels of knowledge.

Christina Sponias continued Carl Jung’s research into the human psyche, discovering the cure for all mental illnesses, and simplifying the scientific method of dream interpretation that teaches you how to accurately translate the meaning of your dreams, so that you can find health, wisdom and happiness.

Learn more at:

http://www.scientificdreaminterpretation.com

http://www.booksirecommend.com

            Aristotle: A Brief Introduction by Jonathan Barnes is a lecture style biography on Aristotle and his many schools of thought. In each chapter Barnes discusses in detail a different field of study with which Aristotle dedicated a great part of his life to, including: zoology, the arts, rhetoric, knowledge and the organization of knowledge, metaphysics, biology, logic, and politics. Most of the book centers around the time Aristotle spent at The Academy studying the sciences with his peers and underlings. Barnes frequently compares Aristotle’s beliefs and understandings with those of Plato’s, and many other well-known philosophers at that time, to illustrate Aristotle’s ideas about the world.

Barnes purpose for writing this book is to make Aristotle and his abstract ideas more clear and accessible to a wider audience. It’s no secret that the available works of Aristotle are not an easy read. Even Barnes remarks about the way Aristotle’s treatises are written, “Aristotle’s writings for the most part are terse. His arguments are concise. There are abrupt transitions, inelegant repetitions, obscure allusions. Paragraphs of continuous exposition are set among staccato jottings. The language is spare and sinewy” (Barnes 5).However, Barnes actually encourages the reader to read the treatises themselves, saying that once the reader has read a treatise; they wouldn’t want to have the information in any other form (like his book). “Aristotle’s treatises offer a peculiar challenge to their readers; and once you have taken up the challenge, you would not have the treatises in any other form” (Barnes 6).

When describing Aristotle’s ideas, Barnes uses a mix of germane quotes and anecdotes, along with his own examples of Aristotle’s ideas in practice. For example, when explaining Aristotle’s definition of knowledge – “’we think we know a thing when we know both the cause because of which the thing is and also that it is not possible for it to be otherwise’” (Barnes 53) – Barnes uses his own example to put Aristotle’s idea of knowledge (more like Aristotle’s guide to tongue twisters) into perspective. Barnes says, “A zoologist, then, will know that cows have four stomachs if, first, he knows why they do (if he knows that they have four stomachs because of such-and-such a fact) and, secondly, he knows that cows must have four stomachs (that it does not merely happen to be the case that they do)” (Barnes 53).

Another rhetorical device Barnes uses to help readers grasp the generalities of a concept is asking the questions which will be answered later on in the text. Instead of just starting with an initial point and arriving at conclusion Barnes helps the reader understand the path which he will be following to arrive at the conclusion. This may seem trivial to mention, but to an unskilled reader, the introductions of each new idea may help take and guide them to the conclusion. Contrary, a bad introduction to an idea may cause confusion to the reader. Questions like, “But what things are real?” (Barnes 64), as a rhetorical device, causes the reader to stop and question themself and things around them which causes their curiosity to spike, ultimately resulting in an increased focus on the text and the ideas. Barnes uses this rhetorical device throughout the book, usually in the beginning of a chapter.

Aristotle: A Brief Introduction is a biography of Aristotle, but it is also a lecture of his ideas and philosophies. The book, informative in nature, does not try to argue or persuade the reader to think a certain way, nor does it convince the reader to change the way they act. Rather, it provides information to the reader in an unbiased fashion. However, some of Aristotle’s ideas concern the just and unjust, the right and wrong, and the should and should not; these ideas come directly from Aristotle, not from Barnes. When Barnes covers certain philosophies of Aristotle, it is clear Aristotle believes some things are better than others. For example, when Barnes is talking about the categorization of the sciences, he says, “Nevertheless, natural science is not the best of sciences…. Theology is superior to natural science: ‘the theoretical sciences are preferable to the rest, and this to the other theoretical sciences’” (Barnes 41). In these statements, Barnes is showing the reader that not all sciences are the same in the eyes of Aristotle. If Barnes ever seemed to have a bias on a specific subject, I would say that it is not his bias, but rather just Aristotle’s beliefs.

There are many chapters in the book devoted to a single topic within theoretical science; however, Barnes covers practical science in just one chapter. Aristotle believes that when a city is first created, it is created out of the idea of wanting to live. However, as a city grows and becomes more organized, a city is no longer just a place for living; it becomes a place for living well. There are obvious differences between living and living well. Living implies only having the things that you need; like water food and shelter. A city provides these things but they also provide much more just by existing. A city can provide the things humans want or crave. When we have the things we want but don’t need we call it living well. Some argue that the things we want are also what are good in life- knowledge, good deeds and wealth.

According to Barnes, Aristotle defines a constitution as simply being the governing body (Barnes 128). Aristotle believes the correct regime is the one that aims toward the good of all. Barnes tells us about the 3 “main types” of constitutions: monarchy, aristocracy, and democracy (Barnes 128). Barnes interestingly lists 2 deviations of the normal regimes, aristocracy and democracy. These two, according to Aristotle, are deviations from their counterpart regimes which aim to the good of all rather than to the good of the few.  Interestingly though, Aristotle doesn’t believe a monarchy is a deviation, he believes that as long as the kingship is ruling for the many and not the few, it is just.

From what I’ve said so far, one could infer Aristotle was a lover of liberty. According to Barnes, however, that is not quite true. Barnes has this to say, “…it is at once evident that in fact liberty will be severely restricted in an Aristotelian State” (Barnes 129). Barnes says that liberty only applies to citizens, however, “a large majority of the population will not possess citizenship” (Barnes 129). According to Barnes, women will not have citizenship and many men can be slaves. Barnes also claims that Aristotle’s regulations were “benevolent in purpose,” they just had a negative impact on liberty for most (Barnes 130).

In conclusion, Jonathan Barnes’ book is a great way for anyone who knows very little about Aristotle to get in to and enjoy the philosophies and sciences with which Aristotle devoted his life to. Barnes’ use of rhetoric and original examples makes understanding complex ideas on logic and knowledge very easy to understand. I also learned something new about Aristotle in the context of Government class. I learned that Aristotle, while a lover of liberty, supported “totalitarian” (Barnes 130) regulations and that an Aristotelian society would be far from a utopia.

Works Cited

Barnes, Jonathan. Aristotle: a very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000. Print.

Only the psychiatrist and psychologist Carl Jung could discover the mysterious meaning of the dream language as I prove in my work, after 19 years of research and numerous cures carried on through dream therapy. The scientific method of dream interpretation is totally different from all the false dream interpretations of the world.

If you want to become a genius you have to follow dream therapy and always obey the unconscious mind with the seriousness that a doctor obeys a surgeon during surgery.

First of all, you must be cured, even if you are not mentally ill.

You may believe that you are a normal person, but the biggest part of your brain contains craziness. Only because you have inherited this content you are absurd and under-developed. Everyone inherits this content in their brain.

We inherit craziness from birth because our brain possesses consciousness. Consciousness without peace is a tragedy.

A brain that can think and understand that it is alive has many necessities, and faces too many adversities. Without organization, a thinking brain cannot but become crazy.

Craziness is the result of the disorganized formation of the first conscience that appeared on the universe. We inherit the craziness of our primitive conscience because we can think. The tiny part of our brain that has human characteristics and composes our human conscience is the result of divine providence. This part of our brain was transformed into human content.

The unconscious mind that produces our dreams in order to help us fight craziness is God’s mind. Our human conscience must help God transform the evil part of our brain (which belongs to our anti-conscience) into a positive component of our human conscience.

However, we prefer what is bad. We let our anti-conscience destroy the human side of our conscience instead of fighting the craziness it imposes to our human conscience. Thus, we betray God, who gave us a conscience with human characteristics, based on sensitivity.

When our conscience accepts what is bad, we lose our consciousness. Our anti-conscience manages to destroy a big portion of our conscience. The more we accept the anti-conscience’s suggestions, crazier we become.

This is why our world is a hell camouflaged by our indifference to what is bad, by our indifference to human pain, by our superficiality, and by our ridiculous hypocrisy. We are merely under-developed primates who possess a satanic anti-conscience and a tiny human conscience that must be developed. Everyone on Earth is an actor. Everyone here is a monster.

The only exceptions to this rule are the real saints who changed the tragic story of the human race with their superior example.

However, how many real saints exist on Earth today?

The big tragedy that resulted from the disorganized formation of the first live conscience prevents humanity from finding salvation. We can think, but we are insensitive.

Ideas are very dangerous because they are made by empty words. Words are very misleading because they follow a certain logic. Logic is a chaotic subject. There are numerous false logics that seem to be reasonable.

A healthy logic helps the human being find happiness. This logic is based on love and compassion. All reasoning systems that neglect human feelings are absurd. A healthy logic must be based on wisdom.

Everybody should be a genius on Earth because the human brain has an unlimited power. This means that everybody can become a genius because the human brain has such potential. If our brain was only animal, we would never be able to surpass a certain level of knowledge.

Our brain is not like the animal brains. We have unlimited brain power.

However, we have to eliminate the evilness and the absurdity we have inherited into our anti-conscience in order to become real human beings, as we were meant to be if we would obey God’s guidance.

This means that when you’ll learn how to completely develop your human conscience and completely eliminate your anti-conscience, you will automatically become a genius. You will in fact become a wise human being. You won’t merely be a very intelligent person; you’ll develop your sensitivity to the same degree you’ll develop your intelligence.

Therefore, it doesn’t matter if you are not intelligent according to the metrics of our absurd civilization. You have the potential to become a genius because your brain has an unlimited power. If you’ll precisely follow the unconscious guidance in your dreams, you will eliminate your anti-conscience and acquire complete consciousness.  

When you’ll stop being a wild and selfish animal you’ll constantly evolve, without being bothered by your wild and evil nature. Then, you’ll verify that you were born to be a genius, but your wild and evil anti-conscience didn’t let you use your extraordinary brain power.

Christina Sponias continued Carl Jung’s research into the human psyche, discovering the cure for all mental illnesses, and simplifying the scientific method of dream interpretation that teaches you how to accurately translate the meaning of your dreams, so that you can find health, wisdom and happiness.

Learn more at:

http://www.scientificdreaminterpretation.com

http://www.booksirecommend.com

At the head of the woman simultaneously thousand thoughts. First up: what to wear, what to say, what to cook. And then: ask the child about … tell her husband that … call my mom. A second later: her lover, and why (this is a friend), prices have soared again, at work, a complete mess. Yes, and live with a thousand thoughts, speeding like a whirlwind in my head. And when something ask you men, you look forward to your help, care, and the shoulder on which to lean. Please do something and cross out of my head, hoping that everything will be done exactly as it was then and ask if we ask. But the men of the same kidney or from another planet, they do not understand why it is so and that’s when they make the “best way” and when deemed necessary. In response to the crying and the words “” Go away, do not want to see you, you seriously do what I ask … “can turn around and leave. They do not understand …

And it might be worth a closer look at us women look to realize that we really want and feel. It is not always an external manifestation of true, not always uttered the words we need to be taken literally. No need to go. After all, a woman tells a different story: “Come and embrace me. Say that you love. And it’s not worth it. ” And then after all the request.

Yes, here we are puzzling and illogical. Do you want to invite guests on a first date? Invite. Just hearing the refusal can not be taken all the way right one. Not one decent girl will say at once: “Yes.” But our failure does not mean that we do not want to go to visit you, we fear … We need to convince, persuade and promise. And, of course, to keep his word.

Yes, we are sometimes difficult, but where do without us. We are weak and timid. We really need your love, kindness, caring and understanding. That’s just plain text requests you can hardly hear it. The vagaries of – yes, sometimes hysterical, sometimes strange things, which are subject only to women’s logic – we’re trying to attract attention, when we feel that we miss him. You only hear said aloud, and all will become clear …

I’m always confused listening to people who talk about global warming as if they seem to know the true answer.  There are those who believe it is true and there are those who do not believe.  What surprises me at times; although it should not by now, are the illogical and subjective attitudes on both sides, scientists and non-scientists alike.

The answer of course is to ignore the army of emotional thinkers that permeate the debate from one extreme to the next, and define with the facts the nature of the errors on both sides of the argument.

First let us get rid of the superfluous commentaries by the scientific illiterates who judge the efficacy of global warming or cooling based on their own local observations of what they think are extreme changes  of both hot or cold weather.  Those who say, “I’ve lived here for forty years,  it’s never been this hot before.”  Or those  who look at the long cold days that stretch endlessly beyond their experience and wonder, “how could the earth be warming up.”

A basic understanding of thermodynamics will tell you that any energy change within a system i.e., ‘Earth’s weather system’ will show sudden temperature changes in both directions of the temperature scale.  It’s all about homeostasis, finding stability which translates into balancing forces within the system.

This means that for regional areas of the earth we will see both increases and decreases in temperature, each cancelling out the other when we look at the overall average temperature of the Earth.  When we talk of Global warming, we are by definition talking about an average increase of the world’s temperature.  Even such a basic thing is difficult to measure when we take in the complex heat processes that drive weather patterns for such a large system.

Second, the mathematical tools we have work well for small systems, but even here predictability is left to the statistical methods that give us directions for our research, but never give answers to the patterns that inherently are non-linear.

To validate the logic of either side, we would have to have mathematical tools that look at the universe well beyond our present understanding or ability, “THEY DO NOT EXIST.”  If they do not exist then any computer program using the tools at our disposal will be limited to the data points on hand, as well as understanding the processes that make up the system we live within.  Since even the best records give us only a few hundred years, or even a few thousand looking at cultural records, geological data, Botanical etc. when we compare it to the life cycle of our planet and that of our local sun, we are doomed to extrapolate well beyond any reasonable statistical error, preventing any real substantive conclusions.

We know that pollution can change weather patterns, but we do not know whether that same pollution can change the overall average temperature of the earth.  We do know for a fact that at multiple times throughout the earth’s history, that the world’s average temperature was much greater then it is now and much colder then it is now; this long before our technological invasion of the biosphere.

The truth is we as scientist’s just do not know the nature of what is true and what is not, but so long as agenda driven grants are given to non-science based groups then the real research into the how’s and why’s of our worlds weather will continue to elude us.

Personally I tend to agree that the world is going through a warm-up cycle, a natural cycle within the normal parameters of the system we call Earth.  Can I prove this, no, no one can.

The goal of this diatribe is to remind people that we do not know us much as many would believe we do.  If we had the understanding of “Star Trek” science, yes we could probably solve many of the problems we have, but blindly following what some guru says that you want to believe will not get us there.  For now “Star Trek” is science fiction sad to say, but so is the science of global warming regardless of which side you are on.

Part One

Part Two

“In their own way, INFJs are just as much “systems builders” as are INTJs; the difference lies in that most INFJ “systems” are founded on human beings and human values, rather than information and technology. Their systems may for these reasons be conceptually “blurrier” than analogous NT ones, harder to measure in strict numerical terms, and easier to take for granted — yet it is these same underlying reasons which make the resulting contributions to society so vital and profound.”

Remember what I said about my eighty-six back-up plans? That’s a system. I also keep a detailed weekly and yearly calendar in my head at all times, which I refer to whenever I need to change a date on something. I also keep track of patterns of behavior, odd connections, and real-life literary symbolism. I categorize people according to their best functions and their flaws, not in a judgemental way, but in a way that I can easily pull up the best candidate for a task at will. I know exactly how much time I can waste before I do my homework, and I know who the top five people I should ask for help are and why.

Every part of my life is based on some system I’ve come up with, and many of these systems are what makes my lazy, messy life so organized and productive. People may not even realize how much thought I’m putting into something, or what I’m sacrificing to accomplish something, but I am always perfectly aware.

I may seem out of the box at times to you, but I promise I’m in some sort of maze that links everything together.

Part One

“Usually self-expression comes more easily to INFJs on paper, as they tend to have strong writing skills. Since in addition they often possess a strong personal charisma, INFJs are generally well-suited to the “inspirational” professions such as teaching (especially in higher education) and religious leadership. Psychology and counseling are other obvious choices, but overall, INFJs can be exceptionally difficult to pigeonhole by their career paths. Perhaps the best example of this occurs in the technical fields. Many INFJs perceive themselves at a disadvantage when dealing with the mystique and formality of “hard logic”, and in academic terms this may cause a tendency to gravitate towards the liberal arts rather than the sciences. However, the significant minority of INFJs who do pursue studies and careers in the latter areas tend to be as successful as their T counterparts, as it is *iNtuition* — the dominant function for the INFJ type — which governs the ability to understand abstract theory and implement it creatively.”

And this, my darlings, is the answer to my life as a whole. I am a writer above all else. I can’t do everything for you, but I can explain what needs to be done so that someone else will do it. Writing is what gives me the power of delegation.

Oddly, I do like math because it usually only has one answer. That’s typically just because it’s easy to figure out, though. I don’t like math that doesn’t immediately make sense, and I abhor all things science, especially Biology and Physics. I’m also very anti-grammar-nazi. Sometimes, fake words just work more better for me when I’m trying to explain things. I can say them in person, so why can’t I say them on paper? I can’t explain the world and follow all your rules- the style of how I say it is what reveals the actual meaning.

Duh.

I certainly prefer liberal arts. It’s not that I’m bad at other subjects- I still get all A’s in my AP classes- I just hate learning it. When I have to prioritize what I need to understand and what I need to memorize how to do, I get pretty frustrated. I wish I could just understand it all and not have to do any of it. I also hate learning “theories.” Theories mean it isn’t for sure, people just think it’s a possibility. But they accept it like it’s fact. And they teach it like it’s fact. And call it a theory. Just CALL IT a FACT for crying out loud!

I’m really only comfortable being in charge of things that I fully understand. I could never fully understand biology, even if I got it well enough to be a doctor. There are some things that are just too concrete for my out-of-this-world logic to consider as possible. Plus I hate when doctors use big words instead of just saying it like it is. Stop showing off, nerd.

At first glance inside a Walmart store, one is likely to see an old, disabled person looking angry by the carts. There are two ways most people look at this phenomena. The first, and the most naive, is the theory that Walmart is just being nice in hiring such unskilled labor. The second of these, which is also wrong, is the theory that Walmart is just being cheap, as they can hire old greeters for much cheaper than the alternate variety. Both of these ideas are completely wrong.

Walmart does not hire ugly greeters just to be nice.

When Walmart hires greeters, they are not in it to give people money just because they are in need. There is always an alternate reason to what they do, and it almost always deals with money. Walmart doesn’t keep their prices insanely low by wasting money on things like employees and cleanliness. Instead, they only hire the people who are absolutely willing to be paid an incredibly low amount, and they wouldn’t hire greeters if there weren’t an alternate motive.

Image via Wikipedia

In the above image, you can see a classic example of an overcrowded cart return area probably caused by the underpaid workers being too overwhelmed by their duties, which proves that Walmart is hiring only the cheapest employees possible.

Walmart is not just being cheap in hiring old or disabled greeters.

While Walmart is a cheap company, we must realize that cheap greeters aren’t absolutely necessary. In fact, greeters at Walmart are often unfriendly and do not make people feel at home; treating them with stares instead of handshakes. For this reason, a conclusion must be met that Walmart could care less about the customers’ first impressions, as long as they make purchases. So why are they wasting money on greeters who aren’t fulfilling a positive purpose?

Walmart is only in it to protect from theivery.

This greeter title might as well not exist, because their purpose has nothing to do with greeting. These ugly, disabled greeters will not be able to stop theivery, but they will be very useful in court. If Walmart is having a lawsuit against a person for theivery, it will be a lot easier to say that they were using proper safety methods but the theif got through anyways. Otherwise, a good lawyer could insinuate that the loss of product was Walmart’s fault because they were not watching the door. Walmart simply can not risk this with the vast amount of people out their willing to steal from them.

Agree with me? Disagree? Give your opinion in the comments.

These three main religions are Abrahamic Religions. Why these people believe in such things that doesn’t exist? I will give all the proof in the end of this topic that demons actually don’t go inside us, they have no shapes, they are not invisible and they have no names. They are actually our bad thoughts which is develop in our brain. But anyway, let me give you more wrong concepts about other religions concerning Exorcism.
Hindus also Believe in Exorcism. In their language, it is known as Mantra. And according to my limited sources, mantra concern with the word Of Magic.  Of the four Vedas(The holy book of Hindus), the Athvara Vedas is said to contain secrets and magic. They also believe in Ghosts. Hindus use these Mantra to evict Ghosts or evil forces, from a place and  a  person. They use this process by burning incense during their prayer or sprinkling water from the holy rivers and other effective prayers.
Buddhism has a clear view about Exorcism. They believe Exorcism as  nothing but just the thoughts which effect our minds.
Certain Buddhists believe in blessings rather than exorcisms to rid themselves or property of negative thoughts and/or negative spirits.
Scientist also reject this view. They don’t believe in Exorcism. They believe that when man acts more than normal behavior, it concern with his mental illness not with demons or Satan. Sometimes a man act like another man. Science tells us that this property is known as Multiple Personality Disorder. Its just like a disease, but it does not mean that a man has been possessed by Ghosts, Jinn, , Demons and those other things which never ever existed in the world.
The Christian demonology. Lets take one of their So called demons and unlock the mystery. Take Baal. Christians believe that Baal is the seven princes of Hell. Baal is a demon in Christian demonology. His name has come many times in old testament . The meaning of his name in Holy books is the master or the owner. And holy books also predicts that he is the owner or master of the east and the whole world. Now read and think carefully.
Freemasons.  They are ruling over the whole east  and the whole world.  The term Baal is used  in the Hebrew bible  has a possible link with this society. They have evil minds. They do evil or bad work.  this society was developed in Moses (as) Era. And Lo, Hebrew bible is pointing out them. But Christians and Roman Catholic church believes that he has  some kind of shape and  he appears in different disguises. The Baal word is clearly pointing the Freemasons Society. Their thoughts and their work are not less than a devil. Hebrew Bible also states that the demon Baal worship  to Pagan God (Idols). If you read the history of free masons then you will find out that this society also worshiped to a Pagan God. As I have told in the Chapter Free masons, that they have  more than one God. Or we can say they have gods. If you want more proof that the demons or evil (Satan) are actually our bad thoughts, then here you are.
 King Solomon(May God Bless Him), he wrote a book about the magicians. He wrote many books. In his book , he had drawn pyramids and some code language. He point about the dangerous magician and evil persons in his book. Pyramids are the sign of Freemasons society , and Solomon actually drawn their symbols in his book to tell the people that they are very horrible type magicians. But people took it wrong. They think that he discussed about the demons. If he does, then he is right. Free masons are the demons.
For example, There is a gang. Their leader is the mastermind criminal. And  other criminals work under him. This is how I take demons and Satan.  Mastermind criminal is our thought and our actions are working under it.
Take Lucifer. The word Lucifer means Pride and everybody knows that pride is not right for us. Its an evil act. We can also take pride in positive manner, that is a product of praise and independent  self reflection. Now religious people like, Catholic Church in Rome, believe Lucifer as a demon. Well, They are absolutely right. Pride is Demon. But they are wrong about giving it a shape and concerning it with unbelievable able myths . Its not always free masons who do evil work. We also do bad things and we think that Evil is forcing us  to do this.
About Ghosts , they don’t exist. The biggest Ghost is our  conscious     mind. And I have already given you  the proof about Jinn in Islam. They exist but not in the sense of invisible creatures or supernatural forces. Buddhism is the only religion, which understand the concept of Exorcism and Demons. These are our thoughts which influence and God call these thoughts and negative emotion as Satan. Don’t try to bring the ancient tradition in this modern world. If you do , then you wont understand the real story. That’s what the priests and MOLVIS do, they try to understand their religion according to the past but not to the present world. That’s why they wont understand. They will take me wrong but I don’t care just like they don’t care about people. This whole process , Exorcism, Ruqya, Mantra and other verses of God to evict demons are all in vain. I  guarantee that these people will suffer a lot. Don’t follow their Concepts and Knowledge but if you want to no one can stop you. Not even God.