“Answers to Questions about ‘the Last Days’”
Written by Loi in 2009
And revised in 2012

Where is the truth?

1.    We do not look forward to have money? Why? Because it is valueless about what we want. Get ready and do not fall asleep. But if you fall asleep, you will miss. You want someone to wake you up, just thanks…important. Because the earthquake will comes if you keep on the watch.

2.    In the future, the new system is different because it came from what religion started. The religion does not mean to make us happy. But it will be gone.

3.    In the future, the nuclear war is coming. Is it true? Who is the war on earth? No more earthling men.

4.    How does the body changes in the last days? It is bright and can be seen. We should research more and find the truth, if we do, our mind and body will get bright.

5.    What will happens when you saw on the news? It is getting worse and worse. People are not friendly. They are so mean, careless, and abuse to one another.

Research more and find the truth that will help you to get it.

Oh, and yes, this does resemble the Hitler method, but im sure he wont mind, so don’t file a copyright please…

So, before we start, lets look at the basics:

- Your biggest issue will be America, followed by other main powers like Russia, because they can use Nuclear Warfare.

 - There is no chance you can achieve world domination in your lifetime if you start from a country that is either a low ecomically developped country, or is quite small with a small population.

And with that in mind, lets go.

Step 1

Form your own political party, based in America. Base this on your own views, and try not to swerve towards what the people want yet.

Step 2

Now, form your own terrorist team with hired mercenaries, and give them all the equipment they need, but make sure its not found out that you organised it. Get them well hidden too.

Step 3

Eliminate all major competition in America, to make sure there is no overpowing government at the time of your take over.

Step 4

Make your method of gaining supporters to be ‘eliminating the terrorists who have murdered the current government’.

This should boost you up to having the biggest part in the countries government.

Step 5

Kill off any remaining political parties, so you are a total dictatorship. This means you have nobody in your way of doing whatever you want in America.

Step 6

This is the easy part. Threaten every small country to become a part of the new American empire, and tell them you will use nuclear warfare if they don’t accept.

Soon, you will have an empire that spreads across the world.

Step 7

Now you have your own empire, other countries will see you as a threat too. Get what countries you can to join you until you reach the point where only the bigger world powers are around.

Step 8

With your new, massive army, take over China.

You will now have almost unlimited population, and you will be pumping out the money.

Step 9

Develop a new type of missile, which isn’t as damaging as nuclear weapons, and wont cause global damage if used.

This can be funded with your new massive amount of money.

Step 10

Threaten all the major countries except Russia, one at a time, that you will bombard them with your new missiles if they don’t join your empire.

Now you have total global domination, excluding Russia.

Step 11

Make a disarment pact with Russia, so that you both disarm all your nuclear weapons.

Step 12

Fire all your new missiles at Russia, and send in your military to finish them off.

Step 13

Take a holiday to Hawai and bak in your success

There we go, you now own the world, and you can do what you want. Have fun

During the Cold War, when the two superpowers of the world at that time, the Soviet Union and U.S. were close to a nuclear conflict, there was talk of an impending nuclear winter.

In the event that the two powers would have started bombing, hundreds of nuclear explosions would have spread smoke, dust and ash into the atmosphere which blocked the sun a few weeks in a row. Humanity would have been decimated by diseases spread as fast food and lack uimtioare.

Today, when the Soviet empire is gone, the possibility of a nuclear winter is almost zero. But nuclear war remains a real threat, countries such as India and Pakistan can always set the tone of such a conflict.

To see how it could be influenced by climate scientists at NASA have written a computer scenario involving the use of 100 Hiroshima bombs like the one issued each encasing the equivalent of 15,000 tons of TNT.

The 100 bombs would mean only 0.03% of all existing nuclear arsenal at the moment, all over the world.

According to researchers, resulting fires would throw in the troposphere over five million metric tons of carbon black. It would absorb heat and carbon, like a hot air balloon, it rises above the atmosphere.

Reversing global warming?

“Global cooling caused by these clouds of carbon would not be as catastrophic as that resulting from a war between two super-powers, but will, however, unprecedented climate change,” said one U.S. official.

Earth is currently passing through a period of heating. After a regional nuclear conflict, temperatures would fall by up to 4 degrees Celsius.

Agriculture will suffer most because of these climatic changes. Rainfall will be reduced by up to 10% in the first four years after the release of nuclear bombs.

None of the ozone layer will not be the same. Explosions will help increase the already damaged ozone layer, allowing ultraviolet rays to reach Earth.

NASA’s main message is that even a regional nuclear conflict would have global consequences.

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=-22tna7KHzI]

    According to National Geographic article is now a global nuclear conflict unlikely. But the threat that comes to “small nuclear war, should the Third World countries possessing nuclear weapons” is still “very real”. Even so, scientists at NASA really dealt with it, what would be the impact of a conflict on the global climate.

    The report, of course, certainly not encouraged to nuclear conflict, or to suggest that nuclear war could have some “deal” on the contrary, he wants to show that “even small, local nuclear war would have global implications.”

    Everyone will be cooled

    Currently, the average global temperature rise (a phenomenon known as global warming). In the case of a local nuclear war using just 0.03% of the nuclear arsenal (equivalent of 100 Hiroshima bombs deposed to) any appreciable drop in temperature, said Luke Oman of the American Aeronautics and Space Administration.

    Explosions and fires into the air would release around five million tonnes of carbon. The soot would eventually settle in the upper troposphere and the upper layers, which would effectively deriving the sun towards the earth’s surface. Although the results were not so serious as in the case of a global conflict that would affect the climate of Oman around the world:

        * Two to three years would average global temperature dropped by 1.25 degrees
        * An extreme decline would occur in the tropics, Europe, Asia and Alaska, where temperatures can drop as much as four degrees Celsius
        * Even after ten years, the temperature was about half a degree lower than it was before a local nuclear war

    The colder climate would cause serious consequences for the cultivation of agricultural products. “Our results suggest that particular areas prone to late onset of spring or early onset of winter would have been seriously affected by climate change,” said Luke Oman.

    Really worse than a volcano?

    Czech climatologist Jan Pretel from the Czech Hydro meteorological Institute in the evaluation studies do not rush too much: “I do not know details of the simulation, which has just been published in the conference, and I must admit that I myself over a similar issue had never thought about.”

    But notes a possible analogy. “The mechanism of the effect on the temperature on Earth is in a nuclear war as well as in the case of volcanic eruption,” said Jan Pretel. Even when it goes into the atmosphere dostane large number of substances, which reflects solar radiation.

    The best-known volcanic events, which could bear comparison with the nuclear conflict, according to Pretel Pinatubo volcano eruption in 1991. It spouted into the air about the same amount of fly ash as contemplated nuclear conflict: perhaps up to ten million tons. But this is only an estimate, in which one million tons of either side, no peace.

    ”The impact on the climate yet been observed for about two years, global temperatures dropped by almost half a degree,” says Pretel nesilnější effects of volcanic eruptions over the past hundred years.

    The last volcanic eruption Ejafjallajökull that a few weeks almost halted air traffic over Europe, had practically no influence on global climate. “Europe has been somewhat cooler than the rest of the world, but it may also be due to other circumstances,” said Jan Pretel.

    Compared with volcanoes, the Czech specialist effects of nuclear war seems surprisingly strong. “Despite the authors’ conclusions about the distance I can not doubt,” says Czech climatologist. Certainly, however, knows that nuclear war would not recommend a cure for the potentially dangerous rise in global temperatures.

Image via Wikipedia

The war between North Korea and South Korea started on 25 June 1950. and armistice is signed on 27 July 1953.

Armistice was never followed by a peace treaty.

The conflict between two Koreas is still on and minor fighting occurs to this day.

Demilitarized zone was created in 1953. close to 38th parallel and is 4 km wide zone separating North Korea from South.

Allies decided to divide Korea back in 1945. and Korean conflict is a clear example of world powers devastating influence on confronting sides around the world.

While United Nations and USA were and still are supporting South Korea, China and former Soviet Union were and still are supporting North Korea.

There are even some people who believe that USA is supporting North Korea in need of the “strong enemy”.

USA military is positioned around the world and South Korea is one of the most important positions for US military bases.

It is not well known fact that USA was threatening with nuclear warfare against Korean and Chinese targets on Manchurian military bases if they attack or cross into Korea from there.

Korean conflict was first in a series of cold war superpower conflicts in third party countries around the world.

Today we see more tension on Korean peninsula with military buildup and provocations from both sides.

Lady Gaga Nipple Slip (She Was Indeed Born This Way)

At this moment, there are at least eight ongoing military conflicts that cause more than thousand violent deaths per year.

Countries like India, Afghanistan, Somalia, Iraq, Pakistan, Yemen, Mexico and Sudan are having major war at this moment, while smaller conflicts exist in more than twenty countries.

Surprised?

You shouldn’t be, war never stopped really.

There is no world peace for some time now.

And like all the other wars in the history, this last; and many believe worst war of all is fought for economic reasons.

Money and only money.

Religion, culture, democracy and all other “reasons” are just a big smokescreen for the public eye.

Some point to the beginning of this scary WW3 at 9.11.2001. and the things that followed it; invasion of Iraq, Afghanistan and other “peace keeping missions” around the world.

Now USA has bases and soldiers in almost every corner of the world and to the point that is probably highest in the history.

Other military powers exist and even they all work together “for a world peace” we can see day by day that only thing that is happening is world wide game of chess where big players sacrifice small one for a better position before the final attack.

I hope we as the free people of the world will not let that happen so easily.

Lady Gaga Nipple Slip (She Was Indeed Born This Way)

Well, to start things off with a little fact: Humans and dolphins are the only two animals that have sex for pleasure. This doesn’t mean that other animals don’t get pleasure from it; it just means they don’t start it for pleasure. It’s for reproduction. And to add to this newfound knowledge, no animal goes and does it after it has experienced it because it’s pleasurable. Just putting it out there.

I think that this one’s pretty obvious; it’s our brains. Put a man and a tiger in a cage together and surely the tiger would win through sheer force. But give a man a knife while he’s in a cage with that tiger and he might win that fight. Now give him a machete. A gun. A tank? You get the point.

Even our knowledge of using basic tools and simple machines is what puts a person at the top of a food chain. What we lack for in strength, speed, vigor, etc, we make up with our minds. Instead of running around chasing a rabbit for six hours a day to get our meal, we invented a car, which lets us go faster than any living creature. Instead of punching the same rabbit to death after all that running, we invented arrows and guns so we can simply shoot it and. And so on and so forth.

It doesn’t matter how far you trace human history back to, because we’ve all evolved the same way, regardless of where we may lie. Thousands of years ago, when continents had no contact with one another, each and every culture evolved some sort of weapon, armor, and trap. The Chinese invented gun powder and other things that went on from that. The Europeans invented the sword, which became the strength of leading armies across the globe. Even Native Americans invented bows.

A long time ago, many ideas became developed as tools to our advantage. Giving someone something for something else became known as trading, or bartering. Bird calls became signals for stealth and human evasion. There’re hundreds, if not thousands, of examples such as these. The possibilities are endless.

But although man may possess an infinite pool of creativity, he also comprises a head filled with negativity, and hands to put it into physical form. For the specifics of the topic- putting that into simpler words: For every weapon that exists, a defense is brought to the table to match, and vice versa. Swords to shields, gun to bulletproof glass/vests; even nuclear warfare has an opposite (nuclear bomb shelters).

The evolution of whatever we were before, to man is the worst thing that could’ve possibly happened to Mother Nature, ever. Why do I make such outlandish statements, you ask? Well, because it’s true. We’ve caused global warming, chopped down too much greenery, completely derailed the natural ecosystem, and worst of all, we were the ones who created nuclear arms. I hope now you see (maybe even a tiny bit) why I think humans are heinous.

To sum this article as a whole in a nutshell, “Man possesses good and bad qualities, but most of them are bad.” But who am I to argue, I’m sure as hell never going to live in the woods and get killed by bears because I believe in natural predatorism and think that the world should be about survival of the fittest. To be honest, I’m the complete opposite of that! But I did feel the need to dish the facts out, make others conscious of whom they may be. So just make sure you know that every day that you drive your car, every day that you work, and every day that you embrace the title of “Human,” you are destroying everything that this earth has and keeping it for yourself. But why would you care, you’re greedy from nature!

            Imagine walking from the car to the office building on another dreary morning slightly enhanced by caffeine via coffee.  In a few minutes the world will never be the same, but that’s still unknown to you.  Blissfully ignorant, you continue towards the office.  Then you notice an object in the sky growing exponentially larger every second.  Before you can deduce your fate set by this strange sight, the plummeting object bursts into what looks and feels like the sun.  You’re blinded by the star that has appeared over your city and at the same time deafened by a roar equivalent to over one thousand tons of TNT.  You’ve just witnessed the first of the only two nuclear explosions used in a war effort.  You are now a statistic of Hiroshima, just pile of radioactive Japanese dust used for political and logistical arguing points.

            The first city to be bombed, Hiroshima, was chosen for a multitude of reasons.  Firstly, the city was a decent size and also served a military role for the Japanese.  Second, Hiroshima was largely untouched by the United States’ air force and their bomb raids which would give more accurate data as to what the bomb is capable of.  And last, because the city was surrounded by mountains and hills, strategists believed the bomb’s blast would be focused therefore causing more logistical and psychological damage to the Japanese.  The initial blast accounted for about half of the deaths.  The second half to that total resulted from a combination of radiation sickness and other injuries that weren’t immediately fatal.  Seventy thousand people were killed in an instant.  The bomb was “inefficient” according to the United States military.  A very small amount of the uranium had actually gone through nuclear fission.  The bomb, however, still flattened over a third of the city and helped coerce the Japanese into an unconditional surrender. 

            The second city in history to be bombed, Nagasaki, was not the first choice, but picked due to unfavorable weather conditions at another location.  The devastation left behind in Nagasaki was pretty equal to that of Hiroshima.  The difference lies in the bomb.  The bomb used at Nagasaki was smaller and more efficient from the perspective of mass versus damage.  It also used plutonium, a man made element, as opposed to uranium.  The detonation process was also different from the uranium bomb used a few days prior to this explosion. 

            The use of weapons of this magnitude is a hotly debated subject still today.  The politics surrounding war are always controversial, but nuclear warfare is too large an issue to just go away after the war.  Nuclear politics are still very prominent today with less than stable countries getting their hands on nukes.  As stated by library.thinkquest.org, “Concern about the spread of such weapons dates back to World War II.” The issue with nuclear warfare isn’t so much focused on the fact that the United States used nukes, but more the fact that other unfavorable nations may use nukes.  What our country did to Japan can be justified for the most part by the fact that we were at war.  The other arguing points include the fact that fewer lives were lost with an abrupt end to the war.  Some libertarians would like to argue that the United States was wrong, but it doesn’t much matter at this point in history.  We’ve witnessed the destruction we’re capable of and can put that knowledge to good use as a world power.

            The devastating effects of nuclear warfare have been witnessed only twice in history.  The damage was indescribable.  Innocent civilians paid the price for their country’s diplomacy.  The global community has seen the dangers of nuclear arms and was given reason to limit the production of such arms.  The United States ended the Pacific War with the most powerful bombs ever dropped and is justified if not right in doing so.