Some people enjoy change, and they look forward to new experiences. Others reminiscent of their lives to stop the same, and they do not vary their everyday habits.

A number of individuals like to live in the alike house, give birth to the same job and lifestyle all their lives. However, others aspire to changes and new experience. Personally, for the quite a few reasons, which I strength of character give explanation below.

First of all, changes in one’s life bring many benefits. One tries new things, gains new comprehension and experience. I think it is great for the reason that the lacking changes soul becomes boring. I am forever trying to make changes in my life. Moreover, whilst I sense that my kick is boring I do not sense attractively about it. I feel akin to my tired individuals living for nothing. I did not do anything exiting, I learnt zilch appealing and I moral washed out my time.

Second of all, populate need changes. Furthermore, we requisite obstacles to overcome and make our goals. I suppose that changes appoint us stronger, more persistent, added self-confident, and more patient. Also, I touch that all people who succeeded in living in the vein of the changes and new experience as it is impossible to be the greatest at a little field without perfecting the existing knowledge and gain new experience. People catch every opening to gather more and modification their life for the better.

From the other side, colonize who like their lives to stay the constant are very permanent. They produce the same job all their life, the unaffected habits, the same weekend and even the same time in being out. I think it is boring. Pardon? Determination they let know their children approaching their lives? Come again? Kind of part will they do for the society? I think such ancestors are just frightened of the changes.

I ponder curiosity and aspiration to the new experience are two of the main reasons of human evolution. Nation for ever and a day wanted to break limits and get more knowledge and experience. So, people who enjoy revolution are the engine of human development.

Those who commit this type of crime feel that they are invincible. They believe that the law will do nothing or it will take so long that it wouldn’t matter anyway. You may want to put a whammy on them but don’t. They will get caught just not in your time frame. They will slip up and than the law will have enough evidence to take them in. If its say a mother in-law than she may just want to frustrate you. So what she has people helping her like those in the post office. You can get around that by writing every agency you know. So hold on a change is surely coming.

Identity thieves are a nuisance and it can take a long time trying to catch these bad guys. keep your head up and continue to make a difference. No one wants to be a victim of identity theft but it happens, especially in this bad economy. You must relax and do what is necessary to get your life back. Identity Thieves you won’t win!

   This is a well known candle wherever in the developed world we are. You’ve guessed it. It’s Amnesty International candle to give light to those peoples that need it most. They have struggled long for the respect of Human Rights regardless of creed, race, gender or whoever they are the ones to stumble on Human Rights. Their annual reports on abuse or torture worldwide are well known. wherever they are, its members are active organising gigs and fund-rising events. There is no abuse on Earth that will escape from them and their reports will be on any newspaper to inform and keep people aware of what’s going on at this time and age. 

 We all know what’s living without freedom of press or speech. Everyday we read or hear of reporters being jailed or killed in many parts of the world. It is a risky profession if one wants to inform well to readers. The image of Juanxu Rodriguez a photographer who went with a Spanish journalist to cover up the US invasion in Panama several years ago went round the world. This man wanted to have a good photograph of the tanks entering in the city. He left his hotel and ran with his camera for a close-up, but he was smashed by one of the tanks. It was what Robert Capa said once, if your photograph isn’t good enough, it’s because you weren’t close to the object enough, either. 

  As many of us know, Greenpeace is an ecologist non-governmental organization that campaigns and struggles for the respect of environment. As the photograph shows, their ship known as Rainbow is well known as they sail across the oceans to stop overfishing or pirate fishing or Army’s ammunition practice in many parts of the world that pose a risk for species and the environment. 

ATTAC is another interesting one worth  taking into account. It was created years ago by Ignacio Ramonet as director of Le Monde Diplomatique newspaper. Its slogan is Another world is possible, and indeed it is if we put ourselves into the task of achieving it. We aren’t to forget that we, the peoples make up the majority of world population. They have been active in publishing small books that inform us on the hottest issues such as the present financial meltdown and why it happened among other issues that the average person may not know, but they should know. They are for the abolition of tax paradises and a charge on financial transactions. they are well known for their summer schools on a choice of topics and their participation on recent global calls to demonstrate wherever we are to stop the gap between the rich and the poor getting wider

At a time when traditional political parties have failed in offering solutions to acute problems that we are all facing such as mass unemployment, destruction of our dearest heritage, which is our environment, homelessness or the younger generations that have no future, these non-governmental organizations may be the light to achieving a better world for the majority of people. They are a hope for many and a real inspiration.  

Many experience frustrations throughout their lives and have no clue how to deal with it. They may even go so far as to try and take their life or the life of another. Its very important to deal with the problems with a clear head and talking them through will help a great deal. make a list of what makes you frustrated and why so that you’ll prioritize which ones to deal with first. Make a habit to take breaths in and out when you feel over whelmed or down right frustrated. Always make an attempt to relieve the cycle of frustration.

Learning is a continuous process throught life and it plays key role in our life.  Life continously throws challeges to face, so we need to be focused and always reay to face them. All this is learing to win over the situations or challenges. We need physical and creative energy to lead the life. Creative energy we can get by learning. In our life journey without learning we can not do anything. To achieve in life we need to have a thought. But that thought comes to us when we are aware of that. So living life with learning is adding penny to our account. keep learning and keep rocking……

There has yet to be a study that can find any solid link between violent video games and people committing violent acts. So do video games really make us more violent? Youth violence often gets blamed on video games, but not other violence. In fact, violent video games may even reduce aggressiveness by acting as a safe outlet for anger and stress.

The battle over violence in video games has been going on since the 1970’s, when a game called Death Race was released. The purpose of the game was to run over “gremlins” that many claimed looked too much like humans. Ironically, people protested by dragging Death Race machines out of arcades and burning them, that is violent in itself. Almost every time there is a major violent crime, the blame is placed mostly on video games, especially when youth are involved. There have been many attempts to pass legislation against violence in video games, with few being successful. In 1994 the video game industry voluntarily established the Entertainment Software Rating Board (ESRB) to try to avoid government involvement. As video games continue to become more realistic, so does the concern of the effects of such graphic violence.

One of the biggest concerns most people have about violence in video games is how they affect youth. Parents are concerned that children are playing video games that are too violent for their age. Whether violent video games effect teens and adults or not, many fear that younger children may be more easily influenced by the violence. If this is true, it should be the parents’ choice and responsibility to decide what they allow their children to play. Letting your child play with knives may not be in their best interest either, but there is no specific law against that. It is just common sense that the parents would not give knives to their child. Since there is little research that effectively decides if violent video games affect us, it is the parents’ choice to make. Video game historian Keith Feinstein notes that: “the Columbine shooters played with pipe bombs in their basement and no one stopped them from playing Doom. But no one stopped them from building pipe bombs in their basement, either”. As for the rest of us, we will not be turning into mass murderers anytime soon. Research has found some negative effects of video games pertaining to violence and aggression, but these effects are minimal, and are comparable to many other sources of violence in our society, “some media-violence researchers recently published an article suggesting that reading passages from the Bible with violent content increases “aggression” in much the same way that video games supposedly do. So if video games have to be restricted from children, apparently so do at least some portions of the Bible”, “And, of course, videogames aren’t the only pastimes that could lead to aggression: dodgeball, paintball, and a bad beat in Texas Hold ‘Em can heighten arousal, too. Dr. Vincent Mathews, a radiologist at Indiana University who has studied the brain’s response to violent video games, suggests that the effects of these other activities would be comparable. “I would think that paintball or dodgeball would show similar results,” he says. “But no one is calling for these games to be banned””.  We are surrounded by violence, so why pick on one source that is no worse than the rest?

There has been a lot of research done to try to prove violent video games do make us more violent. Many claim that their results show this is true. However, most studies have produced varied and inaccurate results. Publication bias is a huge issue, “Admittedly, publication bias (the tendency to publish articles that support a hypothesis and not publish those that do not) is very likely a widespread problem in the social sciences and is not unique to video-game studies”. In my own research I found it more difficult to find articles defending video games than I did articles that accused video games of more than just making us more violent. Publication bias can also be linked with over exaggeration, “social scientists may be too prone to make big and frightening pronouncements from weak results”. Other studies have been flawed due to factors like using outdated video games, “Reading the fine print in the Dill and Anderson study, for example, reveals that the researchers used outdated, mismatched games and required an absurdly brief amount of actual playtime from the subjects”. In addition, for some reason there has been very little long term research done. How can we possibly determine the effects video games have on us if we do not conduct studies that last for more than an one or two hours at a time? If there were to be any drastic effects of playing violent video games they would not all be instant. Dr. Dmitri Williams of the University of Illinois said “You can’t study people for 20 minutes and know what’s going to happen to people in society 10 years later”. Another obstacle that hinders any research done is the inability to replicate or allow for actual acts of serious violence. Although it would be effective, we can’t give test subjects a loaded gun and see what they’ll do with it after playing a video game for 10 minutes.  ”We can’t have people assault, rape, or murder someone” in the lab, says Dr. Brad Bushman, a University of Michigan psychologist who studies the effects of media violence. After sorting through all the studies that have been done, and take the above issues into consideration, there remains no significant proof of any link between playing violent video games and becoming more aggressive or violent, “My meta-analysis concluded that there was no evidence to support either a causal or correlational relationship between video games and aggressive behavior”.

            If video games have been accused of making us more violent for many years now, and no one has successfully been able to prove it, why are we still worried about it? To fully understand where this fear of violent video games came from, you must first understand who the people that have this fear are. Looking back in history, there has always been something that parents of a certain generation were afraid of because they thought it would harm the youth of that generation, “Like Elvis in the 50s, or Dungeons & Dragons in the 1980s, videogames are still viewed as the dangerous scourge of youth culture”. It is mainly the last generation, who are unfamiliar with video games that blame them for the youth violence they see on the news. Many are intimidated of video games because they do not understand them and the complex culture and effects that surround them; “when people are frightened, oversimplifying a complex problem becomes attractive as a quick, easy fix to an otherwise imposing cultural barrier”, “it is the underlying technology that frightens older generations who can’t comprehend the fast changing mechanics shaping the way the world interacts”,”They do not understand the modern language. They become frightened of what they do not understand.” says video game historian Keith Feinstein. What a lot of people have forgotten is that it is not just youth who are playing violent video games. Many people in their twenties and thirties have grown up with video games and continue to play them. However when there is a violent crime committed by an adult, no one questions if video games are to blame, “We are for some reason more interested in violence when it is committed by young people. But we didn’t ask what kind of music and video games Tim McVeigh [the Oklahoma City bomber] was into” said Sociologist Karen Sternheimer, specializing in pop culture and youth at the University of Southern California. This is the perfect example of how we can blame video games for our problems without looking at the bigger picture. Violent video games have essentially been stereotyped.

One thing I have found odd about all this video game controversy is that we have overlooked our own intelligence. If we are smart enough to conduct studies about their effect on us, then are we not smart enough to know when a game is a game, and not to try to relive it in real life? “Video games, like the rest of the media, form a faceless specter that we have called into being with our own internal desires for sex and violence, yet can turn against when we need a straw man to blame for our own recklessness”, maybe we need to stop blaming video games, and take a look at ourselves: “people who had previously filled out questionnaires reflecting an even-keel personality were less aggro after playing a violent game. Those who had a more aggressive disposition were more susceptible to these heightened emotions”. So there is hope for our intelligence yet, it seems that violent people are more affected by violence in video games. Thus one can assume that people who commit violent crimes are just violent people, not mindless killers brainwashed by Grand Theft Auto. So what does that make the rest of us who play video games? Normal, “The British Board of Film Classification conducted a survey that found that “the violence helps make the play exhilaratingly out of reach of ordinary life…. Gamers seem not to lose awareness that they are playing a game and do not mistake the game for real life.”.

            What if we have this backwards? What if, instead of thinking violent video games causing us to replicate that violence in real life, replicating violence in video games actually stops us from committing said violence for real? It is not a completely absurd thought. Maybe when we are angry and feel like punching the next person who says something to us, we can go blow someone’s head off in a video game and that will take the anger away. Although it probably depends on the type of person you are, I fully believe that taking your anger out on video games is very effective, as well as safe. I personally can relate to this. I also find playing all video games relaxing regardless of the level of violence in them. Now some people may agree with this, some may not, but there is one thing that may support this actually being true, “The numbers do not lie. Violent crime is down, but violence in video games is up”. Violent crimes have been going down over the same time period where video games have been growing more popular and more violent. No one knows if this is because video games help prevent real world violence or if the two facts are unrelated and just a coincidence, but how can video games be making us more violent if the facts prove the opposite? “Could you imagine how far the debate on global warming would have gotten if the earth’s atmospheric temperatures were decreasing while pollutants were being released?”

            With all the research that has been done, it is still unclear if video games do make us more violent. What we do know is, if there are any effects at all, they are minimal. Since it remains a matter of opinion, the only thing we can do individually is make our own personal decision on what to play, and what to allow our children to play. Researcher Craig Anderson, chair of Iowa State University’s Department of Psychology said it best in my opinion, “It’s society, not science, that must decide how to deal with the negative effects of violent video games”. Is this going to stop me from playing video games with violence in them? No, so if you don’t mind, I will now go back to peacefully playing Call of Duty.

               Before we get into the controversy behind these explosives, let’s learn some history behind them. Prior to this event, Adolf Hitler had killed himself and Germany surrendered, but the Japanese were still fighting. Roosevelt had been devising ways for the U.S. to get Japanese compliance in a peaceful matter, but he died in office before getting far enough. Truman now took office and authorized a secret organization for the development of an atomic bomb (known as the Manhattan Project), and planned on using it. Since Germany was no longer at war with us, Japan was to be the victim. Choosing which cities to plot was a difficult decision, but it was finally decided that Hiroshima and Nagasaki would be prime targets because they were virtually untouched by any other air raid that had occurred until that time. The bombs were dropped on each city, three days apart, killing between 100-300k civilians in all, and leaving both cities in rubble and radiation stricken. We did this because the U.S. wanted unconditional surrender from Japan, which we did, and believe it or not, it wasn’t even a controversial issue until after the war ended.

                Some people claim that the bombing was a necessary step to winning World War II. The first reason they think this is because Truman convinced the country that it was the best option! It was effective for getting unconditional surrender from Japan, and for lessening U.S. casualties by avoiding an invasion. It was something ‘quick, easy, and effective.’ Another view point is that, we created it, why not have us be the very first to use it? It’s our right! It’s said that if it wouldn’t have been dropped on Japan, then it would have destroyed Germany, either way, the bomb’s use would be inevitable. Lastly, it’s justified in total war, which is being involved in a war that cannot be won without warfare of some kind, the enemy being completely destroyed. 

               While some think it was fine to use the atomic bomb, others disagree. Some people think that it was totally unnecessary to use it and that there were other ways to win the war. We could have invaded the main Japanese island, though having more casualties, or we could have used a blockade tactic on Japanese harbors. We could have also bombed military bases, keeping civilians out of the destruction. Not only that, but the long-term effects were worse than the benefits. More peaceful methods could have been used instead of this immoral uranium-based killer, and besides that, it lead to the arms race! The Cold War was costly and completely useless to have gotten involved in.

                I believe that the atomic bomb should never have been used on Japan. The first reason I say this is because our president wasn’t being entirely honest. Before putting the Manhattan Project into action, President Truman had sent a letter to Einstein about the atomic bomb. Einstein replied, stating that while it would be a phenomenal technological advancement, it would have to be used once it was created, no matter what. And boy was he right. As stated earlier, if not Japan, Germany would have taken the hit from the bomb. Also, when Truman’s diary was discovered in 1979, he wrote that though he’d gotten many attempts from Japan to surrender on fair terms, he was unwilling to barter. With Japan’s German allies defeated, Japan was weakening rapidly. Robert Messer, a historian from  the University of Illinois concludes that “prior to November 1st, Japan would have surrendered even if the atomic bombs had not been dropped, even if Russia had not entered the war, and even if no invasion had been planned or contemplated.” We also could have specified our ‘unconditional surrender.” The reason they were unwilling to surrender was because they thought they were going to lose their emperor. We could have simply stated that they could keep their emperor (much like we did after the War).That would have been faster and easier to do. Dropping the Atomic Bomb wasn’t seen as immoral until after the war; but wouldn’t it have been obvious that the bomb was a problem if Roosevelt wanted peace instead? All Japan wanted was a way out, and Truman stubbornly ignored them.

                Each arguing side has their reasons to believe they are right in the debate of the dropping of the atomic bomb, but in reality, it was ridiculous to use it. We could have restated our unconditional surrender to let them know they could keep their emperor. We could have not ignored their peace offerings, and we had other tactics we could have used! The long-term effects on Japan just weren’t worth it. We could have easily used other strategies! But instead, we killed hundreds of thousands of people, put unneeded radiation into our atmosphere, and opened the gate to the Cold War. Dropping the atomic bomb surely wasn’t our brightest move, but the past is the past and we can’t change it now. But we could have avoided the hurt and the hate towards America and also avoided the danger of nuclear weapons. These are only some of the reasons why I believe that the atomic bomb shouldn’t have been used, and should never be used again. Bombing for peace is like having sex for virginity, it just doesn’t make any sense.

One of the main things that i am all about as a person, is world peace! If i could have anything in the world it deffintly would be world peace, a lot of people say that world peace is impossible to accomplish, and i completly agree with that statment because as long as we have people that are thinking like that, then yes their wont ever be “peace on earth”. But if everyone in the world truly believed that we could accomplish world peace then we could deffintly achieve it. Most people look at it as a big picture and say oh thats gonna be a lot of work to make everyone be peaceful; it doesnt have to be like that. If you want to make a change in the world look at yourself and change who you are in yourself before you even attempt at changing something else in this world.

Another thing that i see as a big problem in todays society is that people are not grateful for what they have; they always look at it as if they always need something else, and its part of human nature to feel that way but if you make yourself stop and think for a moment, and say to yourself hey their are people out their that dont even have enough money to feed their familys or even themselves. Just saying that to myself makes me be thankful for all the things that i have in my life, including my family, my house, my friends, my teachers…, etc. A lot of people in under privledged countries or even people here in the United states don’t have the privledge to have some of these things, so all that i am saying is please be grateful for the things you have.

I am gonna some it up and leave it at this. “If you want to make the world a better place take a look at yourself and make a change” (Man In The Mirror, Michael Jackson) That is the truest statment i have ever heard in my entire life. If you guys are with me on changing the world, first change yourself and make the best person that you can be!

I Love you all!!

So my question to you is, how can America truly be the land of opportunity and equality if people are still discriminating on the basis of color. The only difference between this case and prior ones is that the white man is being attacked instead of the other way around.