The details of the case were that the 20 year old single mother who was into sex trade had consented to having  sex with her client, but just as she was about to offer her services, the so called client pulled out a gun and instead forced her to offer free services. As if this was not bad a enough, when he was done with the prostitute, he invited a couple of his other friends to have a field day with the single mother at gun point.  

She felt that all these injustices happened to her against her will and  therefore believed she had been raped. When the matter was taken before this Judge, she instead threw out the case on the grounds that the complainant was a prostitute who could never be covered by the the penal codes on rape.

Instead of charging the rapists with the crime of rape, she instead accused them of theft of services simply because they got the services without paying for them from the prostitute. The rapists got away almost free in a case that many feel was mismanaged and justice was denied. She went on to argue that by consenting to sex with one man, as a prostitute, if in the end this man wanted his buddies to have a piece of the action, it would not be such a big crime.

Such a judgement in America, the land of the free, where Justice usually seen to be done, sounded really very shocking, more especially that it was being handled by a woman Judge. So the poor prostitute went back home cursing herself for bringing up this case to this very uncaring judge.

Australian court approved the trial of a man at the age of 81 years after his wifeaccused him of raping her 50 years ago.
 
The Supreme Court issued a ruling which said the Australian that there is no legal impediment to the old man’s trial for the alleged rape of his ex-wife has more than50 years.
 
The man said he had not committed any criminal offense because the principle ofmarriage existed at the time.
 
The man hoped to set aside a judgment by a lower court under the law stipulatesthat a man is guilty when he raped his wife.
The man’s lawyers failed in an acquittal, saying that there is a law in 1963 statesthat marriage means of satisfaction, then it is not guilty of the offenses for which to do at that time.
 
The man accused of rape by his former wife in 2009, prompted him to carry out a series of challenges to the indictment alleged.

A law pupil was ripped into a entertainment area and savagely raped after being ‘turfed off’ the last bus house because she was 20p brief of the £5 work out, a test has observed.

The 22-year-old sufferer was remaining trapped in a town hub at 3am after the bus car owner rejected to delay a few times so she could take away additional cash from a close by cash accessory.

But after going for walks for less than a distance, the justice declare she was focused by drink-fuelled John Moran, who then purportedly released a ‘savage’ assault which was ‘almost without any mercy’, a test observed.

The 19-year-old then seemingly gently brought up the security with a moving cops patrol cops, declaring to have came across her semi-naked body program.

The test observed that after being converted away by the Nottingham bus car owner, the pupil known as her mom who decided to gather her for the 14 distance voyage house.

Prosecutor Eileen Auty informed the test that the sufferer offered simply to move to the side of the town hub to additional her mom from having to settle a one-way program she was different with.

She was defeated and raped just gardens from where her mom had ceased to look for for her. When the couple were gradually u. s., Mr Auty said the accidents were so serious that her mom just didn’t instantly acknowledge her.

Mr Auty said the sufferer had been out enjoying the end of her graduate student qualification in law examinations when she boarded the overdue bus last Dec.

He said: ‘The work out was £5. She had only £4.80. The bus car owner would not postpone the 20p.

‘She requested him if he could delay while she got some cash from a close by cash device. He rejected that ask for too.

‘She was successfully turfed off the bus and remaining trapped in Nottingham town hub at 3am in the day.’

Nottingham Title Court observed the sufferer was got by the throat and ripped in to Nottingham’s Natrual enviroment Adventure Floor where she was defeated and raped.

Her ‘substantial’ accidents involved dark-colored sight, a horribly inflammed experience and contusions to her body program, chests and throat.

Mr Auty informed the court that ‘in the cruellest of circumstances’ the mom had drawn up on a expand of the street where she predicted her young lady to be going for walks, and just gardens from where she had been assaulted.

The mom known as her little girl’s cell cellphone twice and on each event she could listen to a ‘grunting’ before the range went deceased.

Police in a moving patrol car ceased to ask the mom if she was all right. She described she was looking for her young lady.

Within moments, Moran showed up, ran to the cops car and bumped on the top He informed the authorities he had been going for walks through the entertainment area and come across the sufferer who had already been assaulted.

The test observed that he informed the authorities ‘You had better come fast. I think a young lady has been raped or something’, declaring mud and the victim’s program were relocated to his body program and outfits when he tried to help her to her toes.

The young lady was discovered close by sat with her legs drawn limited to her chin area. She was exposed from the hips down.

Mr Auty said of Moran’s description of how he came to find the woman: ‘The easy fact is that the defendant’s statements were extremely implausible’.

The district attorney recommended Moran had panicked when he seen the cops car and then ‘made out he was her saviour, her dark night in glowing armour’.

When informed he was being caught on doubt of fighting the lady, the accused replied: ‘This is what you get for trying to help someone.’

Tests revealed the accused was around two-and-a-half times over the lawful drink-drive restrict. There were also records of weed and drugs within his body program.

Moran, of Sneinton, Nottingham, declines sexual assault and injuring.

The test carries on.

You would hope this would never happen anywhere in the world, but sadly its not the case. A 16 year old girl from Morocco killed herself by swallowing rat poison after a court judge ruled she had to marry the man hope raped her.

The family wanted their daughter to marry her attacker to avoid the same it would bring on the family when people found out she was raped and therefore no longer a virgin. When the family reported the attack they were need told if was a good idea for the girl to become her rapist’s wife.

Moroccan’s are now demanding that this law be changed and a new law is introduced to protect victims of these violent attacks. In Many parts of the middle east a rapist will escape jail if he marries his victim.

Women may also face jail if they are married and they are raped. A 21 year old woman was jailed for adultery after she was raped by her husband’s cousin. Her attacker was also jailed for seven years. The woman was eventually given a pardon.

I couldn’t believe anything like this could happen its a disgrace I hope these women get the justice they deserve. Being raped is not a crime and women shouldn’t be like they are criminals.

Read the original here: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2114884/Moroccan-girl-16-kills-judge-forced-marry-man-RAPED-her.html  

Rape in the Storm (Photo credit: DucDigital)

A 23 year old man was recently arrested by Kenyan police after raping two octogenarians aged 84 and 86 for hours. The two grannies weren’t walking down the street wearing mini skirts and boobs showing all over, they were actually sound asleep and just didn’t know what they were getting themselves into when they opened the door for the suspect.

He is reported to have broken into one granny’s house at 9pm, held her by the throat, and pulled her out of bed for the dastardly act. The first granny later fled to a nearby home, screaming for help which alerted neighbors.

The suspect fled into the darkness and knocked on yet another granny’s door. The second octogenarian opened not knowing what lay in store for her only to endure sexual abuse which lasted for hours until the man got tired and slept in the granny’s bed!

The two grandmothers are now recuperating at a local hospital. When asked what came over him, the culprit could only blame marijuana!

Read more…

Illustration

New Delhi, It is tragic! A teenager was killed and burned alive in Nawada district, India. Cause, boys aged 17 years was amajor witness rape his mother.

Youth named Chintu Kumar died horribly from being burned alive in the village Garabigha on Sunday (13/5) local time. Perpetrators of this heinous act was his mother’s rapist.

Chintu is known that the mother was raped by five men took turns in the year 2006 in the same village. A few moments later, Chintu often received threats that he withdraw the case in the police report. Chintu also threatened not to appear as witnesses in court.

“Chintu is scheduled to testify in court cases related to the mother,” said a local police officeras reported by The Times of India, Monday (14/05/2012).

According to witnesses, the offender forced entry into a house inhabited by Chintu on Monday afternoon. Moments later, the perpetrator Chintu burn alive inside their homes.

Police said the perpetrators of rape are still on the run since the incident in 2006.

As the title of this article would suggest, yes he decided to talk about rape once again. The last times that he has mentioned rape, it’s really pissed off a lot of people. Rightfully so, if you ask me at least. He thinks that rape is perfectly fine if you are married to the person and he doesn’t believe that a person can get raped if they have had over twenty sexual partners in their entire life. Well, now he also is openly stating that he believes that if a woman decides to get drunk, she is automatically accepting any consequences that come from drinking. If a woman becomes so inebriated that she can’t consent, then it is perfectly fine for the man to keep on plucking. Obviously, that is such an incredibly wrong thing to say that it baffles my mind that it even makes sense in his head. Once again, Onision is coming up with reasons that a rapist should not be held accountable for his actions. 

He’s also been harrassing his ex-wife and been whining about her on most of his social networking sites. For those of you that don’t know, Skye is another youtuber that dealt with his crap until he cheated on her with Shiloh and then promptly divorced Skye as fast as he could. While settling their divorce, he agreed to give her alimony. If I could, I would underline the agreed part a thousand times, because that is very important for this part of his mess. Well, he’s apparently very angry that he has to continue paying her alimony, saying that he doesn’t have the money and that she’s stealing from him. Because you know, a completely legal payment from one person to another is stealing. Also, thanks to a website that determines how much a person makes as a youtube partner, it is fairly clear that he is absolutely fine when it comes to money. 

Finally, despite Onision being against religion, he has a very Evangelical point of view about evolution. Basically, he thinks it’s a bunch of crap just because he never bothered to pick up a biology text book and read what it said inside. But hey, at least a fifteen year old girl managed to tell him like it is.

Now, the director is not all to blame. Phillippa Gregory does a damn good job of distorting the truth in this alternate interpretation of the story of Anne Boleyn. Her portrayal of Anne as ruthlessly ambitious and downright devilish is at odds with the softer portrayals favored by Jean Plaidy and other authors of this period. Anne’s own diaries would suggest her true personality to be more of the unwilling victim and royal pawn in the schemes cooked up by her ambitious male relatives. Only when she discovered that her path in life would be to submit or face death or exile does she succumb to Henry’s advances.

The opening scenes of the movie concern how Anne and Henry met. Well, there is debate on this, the movie selects Hever. I’ll allow that. But this first it was most certainly not in front of the whole court and followed by a hunt in which Henry takes a tumble, to be nursed back to health by Mary, Anne’s OLDER sister (the movie and book portrays her as the younger sister-this is false). Anne’s ambitions are apparent from this very day, she indeed seems to find her father and uncle’s schemes appealing and agrees to “hunt” his majesty. Hardly the case in reality. Anne was in love with and betrothed to Henry Percy at the time of her first meeting with Henry. The movie has it backwards. She does not “settle” for Percy only after Mary has “stolen” Henry. Another extremely annoying point of order here….Cardinal Wolsey is completely absent from this film. This is such a blaring error as to render the movie completely abominable. Wolsey is such a force in the entire drama, from the arrangement of the marriage AND the divorce, to all matters of state and religion in between…to leave him out is both amateur and foolish, not to mention a missed opportunity for much needed plot thickening.

Running through the laundry list of other inaccuracies….Anne was not EXILED to France because she fumbled her attempt to seduce Henry. This is utterly ridiculous. It is well known that both Anne and Mary practically grew up in the French court from the time they were 12 to their late teens. Only then did the sisters join the English court, much less begin their dramas with the king. And she was not brought back to entertain Henry whilst Mary lay in with his child. Again…Anne most strongly wanted to marry her first love, Henry Percy, Duke of Northumberland. But once Henry had set his eyes upon her and chose to make her his own, then and only then were her uncle and father’s schemes put into motion. Their original intentions were to milk the long-going affair of her sister Mary for all it was worth.

Now, as for the “incest” theory. Gregory is taking a huge risk here by suggesting that the allegation levied upon Anne and her brother George was indeed founded in truth, borne out of Anne’s desperation to get with child after her miscarriage. I do believe Anne was desperate to get pregnant quickly, and she was very close to her brother…but this is a huge leap, and one true historians would never make. It also suggest that something other than Henry’s brute desires were at play here when he charged them with treason, which is not the case. He simply wanted to be rid of Anne, to beget a male heir off of his next mistress.

And good gracious…what of the rape scene? Not only is this disturbing, but so far fetched. Although Anne resisted for years, when she finally gave in to Henry, she did believe herself to be in love with him…or at the very least, resigned to accept her fate. And Henry was completely besotted with her….why else would he break from Rome, Catholicism and risk his kingdom for anything less? No, he would not have raped Anne for their first sexual encounter. He was a brute, but he was most concerned of his image of the romantic courtier when it came to women’s affections.

Finally, a note on the characters. Portman does an acceptable job portraying the character from the book…even though this character is not the true Anne Boleyn. Johannson makes a lovely Mary…and probably quite close to the real woman. As for Bana…a sore disappointment. Bad casting, bad acting. Is this the same Bana of the acclaimed Munich and Troy? Where was the range? He comes across as flat and not well studied. Jonathon Rhys Meyers of the HBO Tudors blows him out of the water on all levels….sensuality, intensity and evil as Henry the 8th.

Why can’t I just watch these movies and leave feeling entertained? I don’t quite know…I care too much about 15th century England for some reason. It became hardwired in me after watching Anne of the Thousand Days as a young girl. No Tudor movie since then has gotten close in accuracy or sheer entertainment since then. Burton and Bujold are classic and untouchable. But after watching this hack job, I have to say I am looking forward to the new season of the Tudors on HBO.

”any person who has unlawful carnal knowledge of a woman or girl,
without her consent, or with her consent, if the consent is obtained
by force or by means of threats or intimidation of any kind,or by fear
of harm, or by means of false and fraudulent representation of the
nature of the act, or, in the case of a married woman, by personating
her husband, is guilty of an offence which is called rape.”

It is clear from the above that rape cannot take place between people of same gender, cannot be committed by a woman or any female against a male( even where there is a group of women) and a man can also not rape his wife. The best alternative prescribed by Nigerian law is to charge the offender for wounding, causing grievous harm or indecent assault. Maybe that is the reason it is often said that the law is an ass.