And she’ll say “Rage against the machine,” but ignore the guy who actually is raging against the machine and tell you to vote for another cog in the machine, a mushy, weaselly sociopathic cog at that. Yeah, he may sound intelligent, but he just knows how to play the game. He knows what you want to hear and says it. Then again, he also says what you don’t want to hear too, but we should just forget about that.

Dick Morris who has gotten much recognition by jumping on the TEA Party bandwagon has gone so far to say people who support Ron Paul are unpatriotic. First off, this is going to do nothing but divide the TEA Party base. The last thing you want to do is alienate Paul supporters. You’re already concerned they won’t vote for a RINO like Mitt Romney, how is insulting them going to help convince them to back whoever. Yeah, like the TEA Party is supposed to be the “anybody but Obama” Party now. I thought the TEA Party was about principles, but apparently not.

They’ve abandoned principles to the point where if you actually have some principles and actually do believe in the ideas of freedom and limited government and some old piece of paper called the Constitution, well, you’re going to be smeared the same way the TEA Party itself got smeared. No, the TEA Party isn’t going to jump to your defense. Nope, they’re going to stand by and pretend they don’t even know you and don’t want anything to do with you. So much for solidarity.

This sort of divisiveness and promoting the wrong people is not going to help you beat Obama, it’s going to guarantee Obama wins. That’s really what the TEA Party hijackers want. If Obama loses, the TEA Party is sunk. They won’t have anybody to rally against. Romney would be the death of the TEA Party, instead of rallying against him, Republicans will become apologists for him. Anti-Romney stuff will start being labeled unpatriotic and they’ll say, oh he just hasn’t had a chance to make all the changes he’s going to, give him a chance. Or he’ll start another war and try speaking out against that in a TEA Party group, you’ll be hung.

You guys are being played for fools. No matter what, TEA Party loses because you never gave freedom a chance.

Image via Wikipedia

Sarah Palin, is a puppet of FOX News and doesn’t comprehend that she’s being used, by the broadcast channel. Notice, recently the reason she state the Republicansnomination should continue because she think it doesn’t need to be wrapped up quickly. Well, she stating that like many limited idiots that if Romney’s was a Evangelical she probably wouldn’t have a problem with supporting him.

We know Newt Gingrich might not win against the present president in any form or fashion. Sure, he will carry that lower level of idiots, at the edge of the United States map. Because, let face it. The South seems to major, at being the problem child of the nation.

Then , the fool being used, by FOX news Sarah Palin, went further to state that four years ago. Americans elected a candidate that wasn’t qualified to be president. But, who truly is qualified for that office? Having business sense doesn’t mean you qualified. Besides, Obama inherited headaches, from President Bush that was deeper than any Republicans truly wants to admit. Three years and four ears wasn’t going to turn this mess around.

Great thing Palin doesn’t have the skills or the patience to lead a serious office, with great responsibilities. If, she couldn’t handle being governor. Then, she definitely couldn’t handle being the president. So, now she’s greatly paid, by FOXY news. Oh, I forgot that might seems , like a sexual put down of the channel.

While she was great for pushing more females into running for leaders, of government positions. But, the lady isn’t worth listening too. When she’s limited in knowledge about government when you hear her speak.

     Obama campaign aide Stephanie Cutter has fired the first shot by releasing a new memo crushing Mitt Romney’s pitiful response about his poor record atBain.

     It seems Mitt Romney wasn’t the super job creator he continues to proclaim. During his time at Bain, Romney closed nearly one thousand plants, stores and offices, while cutting employee wages and benefits, along with partially paying the accrued employee pensions. Even after the companies went into bankruptcy, Romney and his partners made millions while outsourcing their jobs to other countries.

     Sure, Romney may have added jobs along the way, but going out on the campaign trail spewing that he had a net increase of 100,000 jobs is ludicrous and patently false, along with being the father of Obamacare- which is a whole other discussion.

     Romney is the only person on the planet that thinks his baloney answers will suffice throughout the general election and land him in the White House. Simply saying that the questions are an assault on‘free enterprise’ won’t cut it against the money machine that isObama. Newt Gingrich knows it, even though he is catching flack for bringing it up, andSarah Palin knows it and doesn’t care whatever flack comes her way. If Sarah Palin is screaming for Mitt to show his tax returns and explain his time at Bain, there is a fire brewing somewhere.

     The bearer of bad news may sometimes be frowned upon, but ‘free enterprise’ isn’t running for President, Mitt Romney is. Soon voters will want straight answers from the person vying to lead the free world- no stone shall be unturned if Mitt really wants to be President of the United States.

This November will be an election of choice. Either we tighten our belts and bring fairness back to the every day consumer or we get back into the same car and drive off the same cliff called trickle down economics. With so much unrest and angst coming from the middle class, this is a fight that Mitt Romney cannot win.

Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin tore into Michelle Obama on Fox News Wednesday, criticizing the first lady for what she characterized as a recent condescending defense of her husband’s presidency.

“Oh Lord. Oh Lord! Are we just numbskulls out here in the heartland of America? Just a bunch of numbskulls who can’t read the unemployment numbers and see that 5 trillion dollars in new debt later under her husband, President Obama, five trillion dollars more, and we still have fewer jobs today than we had before he took over,” Palin said, responding to a clip of Mrs. Obama claiming that some people are “confused” about the president’s real accomplishments. “But, we’re numbskulls out here and we just don’t understand what these numbers mean, what they represent.”

Michelle Obama’s comments came earlier this week during an interview with CBS’ Gayle King in which the first lady found herself playing defense on a couple issues.

Asked by King to respond to claims in a new book that suggested there was friction between her and former White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel, Obama was dismissive, much like the White House had been in an earlier statement.

“I guess it’s more interesting to imagine this conflicted situation here and a strong woman and — you know?” she said. “But that’s been an image that people have tried to paint of me since the day Barack announced, that I’m some angry black woman.”

In a previous statement, the White House referred to the account as “an over dramatization of old news … about a relationship between two people whom the author has not spoken to in years.”

Image via Wikipedia

Times have changed for American leadership as the people have become acutely aware of how their faith in their leadership has been abused. The question is no longer what you can do for your country. You have paid when the wealthiest did not and while corporations ran themselves so haphazardly that the government federalized your dollars and made you the creditor of bad American business. So you have done for the last decade whether you wanted to or not. To me this constitutes the biggest heist of American wealth ever in the history of the United States. Main street bailing out the very corporations who are so thick with cash, greed and still will not hire those same Americans? America has been saddled with this flat regressive tax to pay for the military operations over seas which has created this astronomical inflation which the federal government has failed to acknowledge for years. And while I certainly respect the military we didn’t get our monies worth. Congress failed to provide adequate oversight through these wars. And quite frankly the wars shouldn’t have cost the American people anything. There was enough treasure in the Middle East to easily pay for those wars.

The real question is what has your government done to you?

If you are 18 and reading this you probably have an idealized sense of how government will treat you. Get over it, Right now our High School graduates, even in AP classes, are functioning well below people who graduated in the 1980(s). Our educational system has made children who will have no jobs when they graduate from college which has also been going on for the past 30 years. That is so our college graduates can go into a fantastic government careers which is better then starving but not really the American Dream we all signed up for. No one really wants a low paying government job in which they are forced to work a 100 hours a week with no over time for minimum wage.

And those that do take those jobs are not efficient employees.

And so if government work isn’t for you, the recruiters will be banging on your door for you to join the military. So there are three jobs in this country. The first is the fabulous military career. The second is an intelligence career and the third is a career preparing the people for the aforementioned positions.

Government has taken all of the main street wealth away from the people. I don’t even think that has occurred in Russia. Even China allows its people to have money but not in America.

So your government has left you, no matter how hard you have worked, poor, a soldier for one cause or another without a reasonable living wage while they have partied and made the wealthier richer.

What you can do to your government…

Let them know you are mad as hell and not taking it anymore!

Don’t vote for anyone who has been involved in government in the last 30 years which especially includes Bachmann, Gringrich, Romney and Obama. Bid all of them farewell.

Turn your cable and telephone off. If they want your vote make them come to you personally. I know no one is getting my vote. Make these politicians earn their way so they feel it when they do something to the American people they are going to pa for it.

Refuse to get involved in the political process and deny the existence of both parties. Trust me you don’t exist to either party until they need your vote and after that you are a door mat for them to walk all over. Your children are to be recruited for wars which ultimately you will be required to pay for when some of the biggest and most lucrative arms deals are going on during that very same war which makes very bad people very rich.

Demand equal and fair representation. And demand your share of the American Wealth. Let’s face it all of the debt of the wars went to main street while all of the wealth of the wars went to Wall Street. And I can’t blame Obama for this exclusively. I personally watched George Bush pass a budget and then tack on a Supplemental bill after each budget hearing. So for the Republicans to complain about debt is not to acknowledge George Bush pushed enormous supplemental bills running up this massive debt. Too bad the Republicans can’t own that. Treat politicians as stupid as they treat you. Lie to pollsters. Vote for outsiders. And never show your hand in who you will vote for.

And that really hot Momma Sarah Palin seems to have fallen off the map since she took her millions and ran. So don’t fall for the gimmicks like Palin who were just lying to sell books. She hasn’t done anything to improve this country but how is that different then anyone else? She has personally killed the disability advocates and women in this country but she is in exile in Alaska never to return.

So really vote for leadership you can believe in. If you don’t know a candidate personally then they aren’t worth voting for. If a candidate doesn’t have time to address your issue then they aren’t worth voting for. Only vote for a politician if they have helped you and your situation personally. If not they aren’t worth your vote.

And please don’t believe anything said or advertised on television. The television people are the worst as they are over paid and have little to no skills except lying through their teeth for their producer to walk away with their wealth. The integrity of journalism left with Dan Rather.

Is Your Politicians Working For You Everyday?

If you can honestly answer yes, then by all means vote for them but if the answer is I don’t know or no, then don’t. Because times have changed and the two most pertinent questions to ask yourself in 2012 are:

What has my country done to me?

And what has my politician done for me?

The Purples Hearts

Quite frankly I have found it very insulting to claim I have not served in this war when I have endured a flat tax on everything from food to gasoline to pay for the war despite the fact that I would not have ever willingly paid for these disaster in the deserts. I definitely would have pulled the troops out when the war became a civil war which was shortly after we invaded Iraq. So while I am not missing a limb, I have served and paid for over a decade for a war which I knew there were no weapons of mass destruction and it was all propaganda for which I blame JJ Abrams. Check out the movie Armageddon in which a meteor hits New York City and the cab driver claims “Saddam Hussein is bombing us”. It was a psychological operation to make everyone in the USA believe Saddam was a threat it National Security when in fact he was in exile. So I believe Bruckheimer, JJ Abrams, Ben Affleck, Liv Tyler, Michael Clark Duncan, Steve Buscemi, Luke Wilson, and most of all Bruce Willis can pay for that disaster in the desert. Because what happened to them was they spun Saddam Hussein as a terrorist and they thought they could cheaply overthrow Iraq but found themselves embroiled in a civil war. There was an exceptionally high probability that civil war would break out if we went into Iraq and killed Saddam but Hollywood wanted it so desperately.

And you know they have never paid the check on that either. And it is now time Hollywood pay the bills. Because they should have never tipped off Saddam we were coming but all of Hollywood is so immersed in our political system which leaks so terribly that unnecessary treasure and blood was lost in an operation which could have been neat and sweeping had Hollywood not made mention of Saddam. When Iraq descends into complete chaos ruled by a more evil dictator that bombs the Turks, I don’t want to hear a peep out of government propaganda that we will be greeted as liberators or that the Mission was Accomplished.

The mission failed before we even went in because we didn’t have the element of surprise and quite frankly we had no moral authority to be involved in a pre-emptive strike.

We all deserve purple hearts in this one. And Hollywood is responsible. Perhaps they should move out of their mansions and go live in Iraq as they are this countries greatest liability.

Hollywood pays first and foremost in this country as they made these wars more difficult and complex then they ever needed to be.

Wise up and don’t believe anything your government writes or says to you as it is all being done to you and not for you. We are all veterans of this war whether DC wishes to acknowledge that or not. They are not allowed to brain wash the people of the United States as it is an offense to National Security.

She popped up again yesterday on Fox to criticize the White House holiday card. Apparantly, having the first Dog, Bo, on the card,and mentioning referencing holiday and not christmas, was too much for her to handle, and demonstrated a lack of American values she holds dear, like faith, family, and freedom. The fact that she could name all three puts her ahead of Rick Perry, but I digress. Yes, she believes that the card should have a Christmas tree on it. She then threw the red meat to the fox news watching, Obama-hating, birther believing crowd, by saying that, “it’s just a different way of thinking coming out of the White House.” That’s code for he’s not one of us, very un-American, possibly Muslim, but certainly not a God-loving christian like them.

In reality, which is hard for Sarah and her fans, this is hardly a different way of thinking coming out of the White House, but more the norm. All one has to do is take five minutes on the computer with the aide of Google to discover that the current President’s card, resembles many from the past, including George W, and Ronald Reagan. Yes, Reagan, the man that gets more shout-outs from Sarah, than any other President. So either Sarah A) doesn’t own a computer, B) know how to work Google, or C) just wants to be on TV for attention.

I am might opt of D) all of the above, but pressed to choose, option C is my bet. Unfortunately, with the lack of journalists on Fox, and the fact that she won’t show up anywhere else (see Katie Couric interview circa 2008), she will never be asked if she was offended by any of George W’s or Reagan’s cards? 

Sarah will continue to try and be relevent, with the help of Fox and sound bites, but the majority of Americans know she isn’t and she needs to get off the stage and let the serious people talk.

Sex Coach Perspective

Men adore hot women and see no acumen why they shouldn’t adjudge and accustom after reservation. Women adore hot men, and are acquainted of why administration with their accomplice may be a bad idea: They are actual acquainted of the airiness of the macho ego. They apperceive that men attach concrete affability to animal prowess. They apperceive that their words accept ability and can even abnormally affect a man’s animal performance.

Could men use a bit added sensitivity, anticipate afore they speak? Maybe. Could women account by side-stepping their reser­vations, award their words and speaking their truth? Maybe. Is this the accurate analogue of ‘gender balanced’? Maybe.

I accede that Sarah Palin is attractive, even classy, but ‘hot’? Not! But then, my belief is altered than a lot of men’s:

To me, there’s a analytical aberration amid adorable and appealing. Adorable is absolutely physical. I accept no absorption in accepting to apperceive a man just because he is attractive. Been there. But, if a man has an simple smile, an agreeable laugh, a animation in his step, an ambience of kindness, a blink in his eye, the activity of confidence, and if he is absolutely present, invites interaction, gives after expectations, cares for our planet… (tell me to stop), again my absorption is tweaked. That man appeals to me and is certified HOT! A adamant face, washboard abs, or a arch of hair that begs to be beat-up are irrelevant.

The time is now! I’m psyched and accessible to bulb both anxiety in that adult activity and accept that macho acquaintance of proclaiming who’s hot. So I will allotment my Top 10 Hot Men openly, after reservation, and may even bark it from the abundance acme (I reside in Colorado). OR, maybe I’ll accomplish a list, analysis it twice, and broadcast it.

    When you look closely at the Bizzaro World of the GOP primaries, they all are at the mercy of the Federal Reserve, Wall Street corporations, The Bilderberg Group, and The Trilateral Group- those that truly run this country and are behind the selection of presidents/monarchs. Can you imagine a McCain presidency during so much of this unrest, given his abrasive attitude? Those groups mentioned have already detected the rising discontent of the people and their increasing “rebellion” (OWS, recalls) and have long decided that brutal repression is not convenient for their holding of power and control of the country. The ’dog mess’ left by Bush and the increasing distrust toward government’s institutions have sounded an alarm- coupled with the anti-democratic decisions of the Supreme Court.

Given the embarrassing circus atmosphere of the republican presidential candidates and the crisis of leadership facing the country, Obama appears as the best solution as he did in 2008, to contain the increasing national unrest with his firm, non confrontational style. Obama represents more serenity, stability, less craziness, less stupid postures and more acceptable to maintain the status quo and the privilege of the wealthier. He still represents “The Audacity of Hope” while the republicans represent the audacity of chaos and erratic behavior and decisions. Remember Gingrich’s horrible and abrasive tenure as Speaker of the House? 

One can’t help but notice how the media is contributing to discrediting the republican candidates by continually showing their poor debate performances. But it could also be that like in the case of Sarah Palin, Herman Cain, Rick Perry and Michele Bachmann, the media figured they could fabricate a republican/conservative/manipulated president, but the specimens obtained have been substandard and of low quality. Take a look at Sarah Palin, Fox News invested millions to make her “presidential material” but she never took off- she was her own worst enemy. She managed to get some enthusiasts which were exaggerated by Fox News, but like Donald Trump- Sarah Palin did not fly. Then they turned to Perry, Cain, Bachmann, Romney and Gingrich- and now they are failing again. They also tried Rick Santorum and fell dead flat. 

In the end they may realize that they are better off with Obama, who wouldn’t change anything but give the people more unemployment benefits, little tax reduction, etc. to keep them quiet, unbeknownst to them while he quietly delivers the crown jewels of Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid- Obama is better equipped to dismantle the “Big Three.” The people that pull the strings do not want “noise” they want performance and results. The result will be an apparent calm and stability to insure that life continues uninterrupted. In that regard, bank on an Obama reelection.

Here’s another thing I don’t get: Apparently some people can get married, but others can’t because the government doesn’t approve of their chosen spouse. The reason given for denying marriage to people who are somebodies brother, sister, mother, father, son, daughter, is that it protects the family. Whose? Whose family is threatened by a couple of guys who want to buy a condo and raise show dogs together? And what about kids? Who wouldn’t want to be raised by people who are fiscally responsible, contributing members of society who put home and family first?  That sounds like a Rebublican dream if it weren’t for those pesky homosexuals…

One more thing: If you are an immigrant in the last fifteen years and you aren’t currently here ‘legally’, you are about one-hundred and fifty years too late. Back then you could have snuck in with all the grandparents of the very same people who are trying to throw you out. What really gets me is that the people who are being thrown out are hard working people who pay taxes and just wanted a better life for their kids, not criminals. (Sound familiar Irish?) What’s more they are actually doing things that ‘Americans’ aren’t willing to do. Oh, they could. They won’t. That’s different. Picking fruit and vegetables is done by migrant workers because when locals are hired to do it, they quit within a day. Check that out, totally true and there has been tons of attention to it on NPR and farmers organizations.  Not so much in the Rebublican primaries.

Okay I lied, there’s one more thing. When did peaceful protest become illegal in this country? Why are people bitching and laughing at the ‘Occupy Wall street’ people? Look at it this way: If you are worried about all those people who are unemployed being criminals, or kids not having enough to do because they can’t find a job, well look no further for a solution! Even if you don’t agree with them, they have the right to say it, and do it, as long as they are abiding by the law. The Tea Party’s first protest, anyone remember that? They all had guns, and nobody said boo about it. From what I’ve seen, these guys are pretty much unarmed. And yet they are the dangerous ones? I’m confused about what is dangerous. The pen truly is mightier than the sword.  Or mightier than Sarah Palin with a hunting rifle.