To read the full article, please go to the author’s website.  This article has been moved do to copyright concerns.

-Does Alex Smith realize what an interesting storyline this is? Yes, he does. He doesn’t say the words and yet…

Smith certainly understands the drama of a former college-underdog-turned-No. 1-pick-turned-browbeaten-QB-turned-lost-soul-turned-comeback-story-of-the-year.

It’s a helluva story, still evolving–however this season turns out. Just getting to 9-2 and on the brink of a playoff spot, after six consecutive bleah seasons, is a remarkable tale.

Really, it’s the living history of the 49ers from 2005 on–doesn’t everything turn on your opinion of Smith-Nolan, Smith-Hostler, Smith-Singletary?

And, having lived through it myself from an observer’s point of view, it’s fascinating to tap into Smith’s telling of it.

Somewhere early in the 2006 season, I wrote that Smith had replaced Barry Bonds as the Bay Area’s most compelling athlete. Since then, we’ve had the arrival of Tim Lincecum and a few others…

But I think it’s still Smith, just as it always has been, for good or bad, and right now it’s very, very good.

I’ve praised him, I’ve criticized him, I’ve defended him against Nolan and I’ve winced at Singletary’s awkward dealings with him.

I’ve kept writing about him, though. Be crazy not to.

—–the column/

Well, Alex Smith, that was easy!

He only had to endure six seasons of pain and misery, several stubborn head coaches, many losses and more words of criticism than his family members could probably bear.

Here’s what Smith says he has learned: The less he agonizes over what everybody else thinks, the more successful he can become.

In 2011, Edgy Alex — steeled and sharpened by six years of rebuke and failure — suddenly has taken over and flourished.

“When I was young, I just tried to please everybody,” Smith said Tuesday in a long interview with me at the 49ers’ facility. “Especially being the first pick (in 2005), I was, ‘Man, I’m going to prove it to everybody.’

“And not just you — the media — and the fans, but my teammates, coaches.. and I’m going to do it on every single play. And with every action.”

Smith recalled with some sheepishness that early in his career he sometimes kept track of his stats during games, just to try to make sure his performance wouldn’t get ripped.

And now?

“I don’t care,” Smith said. “I’m going to focus on other stuff. I don’t really care about that stuff.”

Of course, Smith is never going to be too rude or even semi-insolent. He’s a nice guy, in a tough man’s game.

But that was part of the dilemma — Smith came to the 49ers as a late-bloomer from the University of Utah who had most of his dreams answered overnight by the draft.

He hadn’t earned his NFL credentials. And, under the ham-handed auspices of first Mike Nolan and then Mike Singletary, Smith sure wasn’t going to get a lot of help learning the quarterbacking craft.

Now, Smith is philosophical about his fierce cold war with Nolan in 2007, when the coach took thinly veiled shots Smith and Smith at one point fired right back.

“I’ve grown up so much since then,” Smith said Tuesday. “I would’ve just done it differently looking back. Still fight that battle, just do it a different way.

“And I would say that to him, no question. We’d probably laugh about it.”

And what about Singletary, who once famously called Smith “meek” while (apparently) trying to compliment him?

“I don’t want to dig up all that stuff, but (he and Singletary have) just different opinions on what strength is, in my opinion,” Smith said. “Different opinions of what toughness is. Different opinions of what really I think being a man is, a little bit.”

Does Smith believe the 49ers ever threw him under the bus during his career, as Jim Harbaugh suggested during the offseason?

“The people in this building, in this organization, have always been so supportive of me,” Smith said. “I’ve never felt like I was a scapegoat, by any means…

“I mean, you’re the quarterback, if you lose games… it’s the head coach and the quarterback. If you’re not winning, it’s on you.”

Smith did have a chance to escape the 49ers situation last offseason, and he acknowledges that, at the tail end of 2010, he was ready for such a move.

He’d been yanked in and out of the lineup by Singletary, he’d gone through a new coordinator every season, and a fresh start with another franchise seemed enticing.

“I was pretty frustrated with what had been going on here,” Smith said. “But luckily you don’t have to make decisions right at the end of a season, all emotional.”

Smith took some time away and decided that he didn’t want to take the easy way. The lockout made moving trickier, anyway, but it was too simple to take off and let everyone assume he was blaming the 49ers for his troubles.

And Smith looked at the big picture.

“This is what I’ve started to understand: Where do I have a chance to have success, and by success, I mean win games?” Smith said.

“And for me, it was an easy decision. It was very clear that this was it. I knew the talent we had here. I knew the guys we had. We didn’t have a bunch of knuckleheads. We’ve got a great group.

“Then I liked what I was hearing from coach Harbaugh.”

Yes, Harbaugh. That guy.

Smith was already on the path to edginess, but joining up with Harbaugh certainly didn’t hurt the process.

What Smith says he admires most in Harbaugh is that the coach doesn’t worry about what anybody else thinks.

After six seasons in partial NFL hell, Smith was 100 percent ready for that.

“The thing I take away most is it’s just that mindset, it’s that attitude,” Smith said. “It’s that chip and how to use it.”

Yes, Smith has a chip on his shoulder, and he didn’t mind when I pointed it out.

The chip definitely showed up when I asked if he believes he needs to kick the passing game into gear to win in the playoffs.

“Where I’m at, I just don’t give a crap about that right now,” Smith said of his 9-2 team, on the brink of clinching the NFC West crown. “We’re winning games, playing football, you know what I’m saying?

“I’m having such a good time playing football and trying to get better at my position and trying to strive for that each and every week, I guess I just don’t give a crap right now.”

He wouldn’t have said it that way six years ago. He would’ve tried to be nice about it.

Edgy Alex doesn’t play it that way; he’s an overnight miracle, after six nightmare seasons.

-EDIT-

Unfortunately, I was unable to complete my goal due to other things I had to do, and the fact that I tend to spend a lot of time making long and detailed articles. I do however plan on taking on the more managable task of writing one article every day over the course of 2012.

The surname Smith is the most frequentname in the US.

What’s in a name? lets take Smith for example, its an old English family name, in fact, its the most common surname in the United Kingdom, as well as Australia and the United States, its also the second most common name in Canada

The name derives from smið or smiþ, the Old English term meaning one who works in metal, but nowadays its more recognized as a worker, as in shoe-smith, someone who works with shoes, Gold-smith, Copper and Silversmith are self explanatory likewise Metal-smith, there are others including Gunsmith, locksmith and so on. People who worked with tin was a Tin-smith, there’s also a White-smith, a Wheel-smith and Green-smith, (These were those who worked with copper after it oxidised) the name Six-smith has nothing to do with six smiths but it is deviation of a sickle or scythe-smith.

But I got to thinking how come a person who makes objects from wrought iron or steel is called a Blacksmith? And no,a Blacksmith its not a man who shoes horses, he’s called a farrier.

So why Black? It appears its because he smites (hence Smith) Iron (Black metal) this is the colour metal goes when its heated, so there you have it a Blacksmith is someone who Smites black metal.

There’s a mountain called Smith as well as a Volcano, a fort and a chart, a trick in skateboarding is call a “Smith Grind” and part of weight training equipment is called a Smith Machine.

A Center, a County, a Tower, a river, a Collage even a Valley can all be found in America, one of the craters on the moon has the name smith , In Britain one of the biggest and most well known book shops is W.H.Smith and Smiths Crisps have been nibbled for many years.

The oldest record of the name dates back to Anglo-Saxon times, in those days, inherited names were still virtually unknown, in 975 Ecceard Smith was recorded in County Durham, North East England.

The name is so common that people who wish to remain anonymous will call themselves Smith, an Englishman is often referred to as John Smith, John was at one time the most common given name in England which is where the name originates, Germanic, Romance, Celtic and Slavic languages all have there own variation of the name Smith.

Copyright..johnnydod 2011

Some see this as an act of heroism, as others view the man as a cold blooded killer, responsible for the death of three men who’s lives were not destined to be over. Either way, what these rapists have left the poor daughter to deal with is terrible, and she will always have to deal with a virus that could at any point take all that she has left in punishment for inhabiting this cruel world. They did that without regret, without morals, without a drop of remorse, and yet what they were dealed in return is not, by law justified by their actions.

This leaves another uncomfortable predicament; what if those were the wrong guys? Now not only are they not punishable by the death penalty, they may be completely innocent. Until these victims have been found to have raped the daughter of their violent axe murderer in a court of law, these are completely regular people, having done nothing to deserve been hacked into two pieces by an angry daddy.

Reports are yet to be heard of how the father’s court battle is playing out, but as far as I’m concerned, he’s facing three counts of murder and one of attempted murder on the man who escaped. He is also looking at charges for stalking his victims for several days before the event.

A History of Brainwashing

Swift and violent indoctrination of the weak minded youths of nations has been used numerous times in order to take complete control of a country, no matter how hard-set the citizens are against dictatorship. The term brainwash comes from the Chinese word 洗脑 (Pinyin: xǐ năo), meaning literally “to wash the brain”, and under English definition, “To affect one’s mind by using extreme mental pressure or any other mind effecting process. (i.e. hypnosis)”. Over the course of history, there have been accounts of this dating from far back as 1950 during the Korean War, all the way up to present day China, where attempts are being made to take charge of the minds of the Taiwanese people. Each instance of such actions follows the same 4 steps leading up to the final downfall of the controlled, these being first demoralization, then destabilization, crisis, and finally normalization. However slow these stages may commence, they are each equally necessary in majorly reforming a nation’s political standing, and is all show well in every instance of occurrence throughout history

The idea of brainwashing was first introduced in 1950 during the Korean War, on small scale, as American GIs held as POW’s developed communist ideas, without a doubt adopted from the very people who had them locked up. This caused unthinkable issues with the victims of such indoctrination, as well as the suffering families, likely being ridiculed by patriotic neighbors. That was done by strict psychological stages of change, but another, quite different instance in 2004 in which the use was to recruit terrorists for acts of violence against the US, was carried through by the reckless bribery of drugs and intoxication of the targets. This specific method of indoctrination raised a frightened energy in America, bringing forth even more hatred toward the Al Qaeda than was already held before. Such instances show how truly simple brainwashing can be if the conditions are just right and the entire experience takes no longer than about an hour.

The Fundamentals of Brainwashing

            In completely reforming the political philosophy of an entire nation, there are four fundamental stages in manipulating the brains of the otherwise opponents of the motion. The first of these is demoralization, in which ideas are pumped into the soft heads of the children, taking one and a half to two decades, because that is about the length of time needed to educate one generation of students. The next step is to destabilize the country, the basis of this being to knock the people out of balance, whether this is by economic troubles, foreign relation disturbance, or an upset in the defenses system, this lasting only about two to five years. Thirdly, there must be crisis, possibly brought on in as quickly as six weeks, and then finally normalization, where a sudden violent change in power leads to the so called “solving” of the posed national issue. These four stages work through the psychological balance in people’s brains, stealing away previous ideas, and leaving the new ones to slide nicely into place.

The first half of national indoctrination, lasting as long as twenty-five years ideally, is the key factor in pushing out old beliefs. During demoralization, the education system must be used in order to pump in the desired ideas through the spongy youth, washing the unwanted ways right out. Next, to destabilize the people, the economy, foreign relationships, and/or national defense system must be given an unnoticed shove to the floor. This prepares the country for the weakened, desperate state required to change the ideals of all of the citizens. Once completed, the situation is perfect to move on to the next two, shorter, yet more fragile stages of indoctrination.

The nation is skyrocketing down, and is becoming increasingly vulnerable at this point in the transformation. The southward spiral must be secured into a full on crisis before further action may be taken. This means that the country needs to hit rock bottom, and may not without a helpful shove in the basic direction. Once that is finished, the final step must be take, this being normalization, or picking the nation up from the ground while simultaneously installing the desired form of government. If these two steps are not done correctly, the consequences could mean charges of treason against the conspirators.

How to Go About the Four Steps of Indoctrination

          Before going out and trying to take over a country, one needs to have some way of achieving each of the four stages of brainwash. Demoralization requires some means of sneaking in the indoctrination into the schooling systems in order to control the ideals of the children. Just the same, during destabilization and crisis, there needs to be a way to push the country into the downfall without showing purposeful harm. Lastly, the normalization process should be done in a way that seems heroic and wise to the people being rescued from rock bottom, while still creeping in the intended political ideas. These are processes that every future dictator has to be able to complete in order to take power.

            Demoralization is the first, most important stepping stone in indoctrination, as this is when the coming generation that will be running the nation when the take-over is all said and done, is filled with the biased ideas of the eventual leader. This can be done sneakily by creating a set of textbooks that reflect the desired views, and making them popularly, if not exclusively used throughout the education system. Also, a nice way of introducing the intended ideals is by designing required school activities that directly teach the beliefs, such as songs, history lessons, and other possible actions. To spread the icing on the cake, one must make sure that the teachers hired will not rebel against any of the bias. With these basic steps, demoralizing a country is done swiftly, and quietly. In the US, Television networks such as abc, CBS and NBC, filmmakers such as Oliver Stone, and Government Officials such as President Barrack Obama may well be part of a process of demoralization.

            In order to make the citizens oblivious to totalitarian changes, the nation must be destabilized, and put into a state of crisis. In order to trigger such issues, one must first decide what is to go wrong, the economy being the simplest to set off balance. In order to make this financial failure occur, there must be inflation, caused by such basic aspects as disrupted international trade. Starting trouble with another country that provides an extremely necessary import can cause recession, which is a huge leap in the right direction. Once this spiral is on course, indirectly encouraging the purchase of foreign made products can send the economy toppling over. This leaves the nation and the citizens weak, and vulnerable to corruption, which is exactly what needs to happen. The forbadement of domestic oil drilling, the war in the middle east, and the disruption of the banking and homing situation in America all represent possible methods of destabilization to lead to crisis.

            The final and most delicate procedure in overthrowing a countries government without upsetting the people is to take control, pulling the suffering families out of the recession, making a heroic image, masking the true, totalitarian actions. The best way to go about doing such is promising the people each and every perfect aspect that they wish for, while “solving” the issues at hand exactly the way they were intentionally started. Putting a sudden push of force into the troops in the war that upset the economy can end the conflict, taking all of the valuable resources. Next, encouragement of domestically manufactured products solves whatever recession was still occurring. If this step is successfully completed, then the job has been done, and the country has been overtaken. Barrack Obama’s promise of change with programs such as his socialized health care reform may or may not be the normalization process, although unlikely due to the fact that there has been no apparent outright crisis, or obvious violent changes of power or structure.

Issues of Immediate Concern

            Brainwashing a nation is a risky, and extremely difficult feet to accomplish, and can lead to serious consequences. If caught in the act of attempting to overtake a country, the penalty in many places may be death, and most others, lengthy jail sentences. The reputation of the convicted would be ruined, and the person forever hated by all in the victim nation of the tyranny. The very careful process must be done correctly, or these heavy consequences will be suffered. For those who believe strongly enough in the opposite direction as their nation, however, this can be the perfect opportunity for them to take control.

Top Ten Dictators

10. Porfirio Diaz staged a revolution in Mexico against a predecessor that wouldn’t relinquish the presidency as legally required, but then ended up making the same mistake himself

9. Fidel Castro became prime minister of Cuba in 1959 after the revolution, and later moved up to president, then, inevitably becoming dictator.

8. Chairman Mao lead the People’s Republic of China until 1976, heading the Communist Party of China.

7. Idi Amin rose up the ranks of the British Colonial regiment to become the Commander of the Ugandan Army. He took over a small central African nation in a military coup and declared himself president.

6. Vladmir Lenin established the Soviet system of government under the Bolsheviks, and was elected chairman of the Council of People’s Commissars in 1917.

5. General Franco began as a military man, gaining the title General during some political unrest, ended up having to leave Spain for a lobby for a state of emergency, but came back to spark the Spanish Civil war with his newfound loyal Army of Africa.

4. Benito Mussolini was appointed prime minister of Italy in 1922, leading the nation to a new height of power, and became the fascist dictator of the country.

3. Josef Stalin was angry with new laws against thievery that came with the communist government, and robbed a bank to prove a point, killing forty people in the process. He was the leader of the Soviet Union from 1922 to 1956, when he was assassinated.

2. Pol Pot, leader of the Khmer Rouge, headed a rebellion against the government of Cambodia, and became the ruler of the nation in 1975.

1. Adolf Hitler was born in a pub in Austria, becoming quite a troubled young man as his father was often violent at him and his mother, and was bullied by Jewish children. After World War II, he became involved with the National Socialist German Worker’ Party, and eventually founded the Nazi Party, taking power as Fuhrer.

Top Ten Alternative Political Movements

1. The Tea Party
2. The Anti-Masons
3. The Euroskeptics
4. The Modern Whig Party
5. The Polish Beer Lovers’ Party
6. American Secessionists
7. The Bull Moose Party
8. The Freedom Party
9. The Pirate Party
10. U.S. Marijuana Party

For more information, feel free to watch this informational interview provided by a formal KGB agent: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Iz3VjoHXLA&feature=related

What is the purpose of cheating and degrading women? Do you get a kick out of hurting their feelings? Is it some kind of game to you? It makes no sense to mess with another female while you’re with someone else. Why not just man up and tell them you have feelings for someone else? You’re acting very childish and it needs to stop because you’re the type of people that make it hard for good men like myself and others to find a woman. You make it seem like you have no life goals in life than to hurt them. That makes you lame as hell. Grow up man.

FOR WOMEN

What is your purpose of saying all men are dogs when it’s not a true statement? Why not go out with a different guy instead of going out with the same type of dudes that will get you nowhere. Then when you get cheated on you pretend that it’s all our fault forgetting that you date the same type of guys over and over and keep getting the same results. Date someone new. Maybe instead of going for the trouble maker in school or the one with the fancy material things try going for someone with morals and someone who has a future ahead of them. Also, why would you go back to the same person who cheats on you? So you can get cheated on again…that should be your answer. If he messed up leave him and don’t come back, it’s as simple as that.

The real reason though is all about that thing! Women think tall men got big and long shafts; a requirement for satisfaction! This could be another ‘Miss-Education of Lauren Hill.’ Luckily, Beyonce doesn’t think so. Sean Paul is one of the coolest short guys around. If you didn’t know, you better ask Jay-Z, baby! Think of Ludacris, Ooh, it’s a crisis, Judith is still drooling! And Danny Davito, ooh, he melts their hearts away and leaves them all wet!

Researchers in Hollywood have found that due to the recession, marrying a tall woman is regarded as polygamy. Men are divorcing their wives to marry short women to cut on spending. This was illustrated by the use of a tablet of bath soap. The same tablet that lasts a short woman a month, when used by a tall woman, it’s like two women; it lasts two weeks only!

The good news is: not all families have felt the pinch. By the time of going to press, Liz Weatherspoon was still happily married! The genius of Will Smith has also become clearer. He’s foresighted and insightful; Jada got the height and their family’s still intact. In fact while giving a sneak peak of “The Karate Kid” on Oprah, the Smiths looked happier and more closely knit than ever before! 

That was a passing glance, now is your chance to get the solid reason why men dig short women. Once again, it’s all about sex. Men find short women irresistibly hot, sensitive and receptive hence easy to please. Unlike the sensory nerves that travel longer distance to the brain to trigger an effect, a short woman’s response or reaction’s instant and spontaneous. This turns even the weakest man on. An orgasm is guaranteed. The shaft doesn’t have to be long to hit the “G” spot, it’s near. Since it’s closer to the heart, every session of sex is heartfelt. With every single dip and wiggle of the waists, the shaft touches her heart establishing a magical physical and spiritual connection making them faithful and inseparable!

The women that confessed of having sex without an orgasm on Oprah and Tyra Bank’s Show were all tall. Efforts to get short women’s side of the story once again hit a glitch. The government has since issued a warning against taking to heart unverified stories; such stories though boasting of iconic names could be “just works of fiction!”

 “Hahahahahaha!” This is your reporter,

D In The Darling! 

• Controlling Images 
• Activist Knowledge
• Discourse of femininity
• Facticity

Small business  as representative individual genomic compliments were at the heart of the 18th century economist Adam Smith’s paradigm for the best recombinant criterion for individual construction of business. Self-interest in sexual reproduction in business would evolve the best form of human social environment, while directed evolution under the aristocratic power of kings or de facto adverse, oppressive organization would reinforce economies primarily existing to enrich the rich and empower the powerful. Such an impingement upon sexuality in business combination would impair both the individual genomic interests and the health of business diversity so viral for the natural selection of variation and intelligence adaptable to existential macro and micro-economic challenges.

Today, large corporations with more than 2000 employees and stockholders with investments in more than three corporations create a homosexuality within the business and economic environment reducing the diversity of recombination through sexual reproductive business freedom. Reduction of the economic  genomic endowment of the species is a consequence of the inbreeding of mass social business organizations driving invention, innovation and self-interest into submission to the macro-goal of corporate profit or communist party leadership cadre goals.

Corporatism has ecological as well as individual business sexual genomic mal-effects. Corporatism’s goal increasing profits for a social minority present an implicit attack upon natural resources that may be considered finite on Earth and an extended support system for all individual genomic compliments. Corporate globalism acts implicitly as a retrovirus upon the total complex compresent genomic compliment of humanity,

As large organizations reduce sexual business diversity, they also increase the empirical draft of resources to support corporate goals. The homosexual corporate leadership reinforces a continuing degradation of the human business sexual reproductivity that should flourish at individual and small business levels when free of the overpowering impact of control imposed by the homosexual global corporate matrix.

Adam Smith’s capitalist paradigm may evolve into a fulfillment of Marx’s dialectical materialism supplanting sexual reproduction with a vast, sucking homosexual attack upon creativity and environment. That seems a reasonable criteria for the construction of a world moving toward Armageddon consolidated within a few political-economic blocks under the authority of an anti-Christ amused to observe from the reconstructed Temple at Jerusalem. The Gates to hell are broad and many will be the governments that trod in the herd for oblivion. Vast resource intake requirements for expansion of global corporatism dull  freedom and sensitivity in conservation of natural resource use. Within small organizations;  sexually reproductive business genomes adaptable, and relieved from superfluously oppressive natural selection pressures, genomic recombinations of business innovations can evolve at an accelerated pace.

Citizens should be free to do business without the homosexual competition of corporations of more than 2000 employees. Democracy should vote on what mass resource use should be allowed before selecting how to best uses resources within the constellation of small businesses. Small businesses would bid ideas for actualization within a competitive political environment implicitly without the special interest and corrupting corporatist influence of organizations of more than 2000 employees. With more ideas and business concepts, democracies could elect the best for business actualization and pay a compensating (kill fee) fee for the rest of the finalists. New ideas should proceed from individual small business sexual creativity rather than be forced from the Gates of Hell and the anti-Christ’s desire for global homosexualization in totalitarianism of the Earth’s populace.

Image via Wikipedia