UFOlogy is not sci-fi phantasmagoria. Featuring Best shots reveal the unidentified flying objects. Do you know what?

Many people think about UFOs, they are nonsense. But on the contrary! The issue is interested in UFOs are many very serious people, scientists, and even governments. The main mistake is the substitution of a UFO phantasmagoria. It is therefore good to say what the acronym means. UFO is an acronym for Unidentifield Flying Object, or neidetnifikovatelný flying object. Everything we see and what we can say with certainty what it is.

It is about optical illusions. The physical phenomena which can not explain current knowledge. UFO hiding under the guise of the government and its army of their research. I on the credible evidence and documents.

Often, UFO sightings and UFO video do not give enough information and necessary quality to their identification. It can also be a forgery for the purpose mentioned in visibility or camouflage.

The observations reveal a number of fighter pilots and airliners. So people as trustworthy, as doctors or teachers. The UFO encounter with former agents speak a variety of agencies around the world. The UFO has met many ordinary people like us. And do not think that is the calling card of a wise man say something that we did not see it there.

Best UFO video 

¨We believe that part of the UFO phenomena is of extraterrestrial origin. We believe that government and military superpower of the existence of extraterrestrial civilizations know. Maybe they are in contact. And most likely it is one of the biggest conspiracies. Even UFO skeptics in most cases do not claim that aliens exist. They just want hard evidence, if someone wants to come up with such a revolutionary statement that was recorded alien machine. A conclusive evidence for them is only a sample of extraterrestrial material, or DNA technology.

UFO does not automatically mean aliens and sci-fi.

Regarding UFOs, each of us. Look at the sky at night, seemingly full of stars. You will see lots of lights really more or less clearly. Some even with variable brightness. Some too clear on that could be a star. Some may move. At that point the UFO everything can not be clearly identified. This is a star, a planet, the plane or satellite, balloon luck.

Many people and governments interested in this issue exploits and flooding the Internet with high-quality fakes. Nowadays it is easy to create credible video as well as a fake bill. Some want to attract, second and third discredit camouflage. However, there is a UFO, because nobody in the world can not safely identify 100% of the observations.

For many people, excellent UFO business. As the UFO skeptics say: Lecture about UFOs and aliens that there are one thousand U.S. dollars you can not charge …. Or: I know that there was no UFO book will be sold up in hundreds of pieces …

Together with their own sound analyzes and commentaries, Kean united in their book 20 of that in their eyes credible witnesses and investigators from the military and governments, including five generals, skilled military pilot and a former U.S. governor, all personally from their own experiences and experiences . report In addition, the foreword is by John Podesta, the White House chief of staff under President Bill Clinton from 1998 to 2001 and later head of the “transition team” of current U.S. President Barack Obama (… as reported).

TDG: Leslie, her book “UFO” appears supported by (political and scientific) heavyweights: John Podesta has written the foreword and scientists like Michio Kaku (editor Grewi editors: M. Kaku is one of the most famous physicist in the U.S. ), the book called “new gold standard for UFO research.” As for her book differs from other books on the subject?

Leslie Kean: On this question I first come to mind four reasons:

First The book contains chapters including 17 contributing authors. These are personal testimonies of some of the most credible person in the world, including five generals. The fact that these witnesses describe their experiences in their own words and they are not reports about quotations and excerpts are from the second hand, makes the book special. So it is to have chapters, as written by the key players themselves and describe what they saw, felt and learned from their observations. In this form, this can only happen if the witnesses come to speak for themselves. Here also the authors of each character is preserved by his contributions and taught. So instead of rambling interviews are transcriptions So, are we to make informed descriptions direct from the source. The work of these authors was very time-, concentration-and communication-intensive. 


Second The book contains only well-documented and factual material to a high standard of journalism. It is carefully thought out and analyzed. There is no claim or cause unnecessary pulled by the hair conclusions. For this reason, people like Podesta and Kaku behind the book. In addition, it is easy to read and written by a trained journalist, a seasoned writer and not a UFO researcher, ufologist, written self-proclaimed UFO expert or scientist. My job was to decide what material journalistic standards which are not. Given a topic, such as the UFOs you have to be very careful how you present it and I’m trying to achieve with my book, yes even government officials. One must also not the reader with extensive details on request. Most mainstream journalists can not touch this issue because they simply too hot. I’ve separated the wheat from the chaff, and hope that it will therefore now be easier for other journalists to approach the subject. 
 
 Even though it is the UFO community praises the book many times, it was not written for people who already have UFOs do modest. My story presents new and astonishing information, just as they have had on me when I first heard of the cases. For the ‘ordinary people’ are the really new news, real “breaking news”. To those who are already familiar with the topic, found some information is known – or not. I’ve worked hard to make the book and it gathered material on both skeptics and the curious newcomer for engaging and intelligent.

Third With the help of a group of officials, I have the U.S. government one, I think, suggested unprecedented plan of how the current policy can be changed when it comes to UFOs. The proposal is explained in the book and I am convinced that it works and it has a chance to bear fruit. I hope that people will understand the logic of this plan, when they read the book.

4th “UFO” was also one of the big publishing houses, the ‘Crown Publishing Group’, which belongs to ‘Random House’, and even that is transferred is rather unusual for a book on such a subject. My publisher asked me a great lecturers and a very professional team are on hand to set the standard and cutting to sell the book as much as possible. Crown also has an outstanding public relations and marketing department, which put the book for months and have good connections with the media. Since the book was so from the start by its own publisher in a good position within the political and Medienestablishments, so it has a good chance to reach a wide, mainstream audience.

TDG: How did they mention involves her book 17 UFO sighting reports first-hand witnesses with impeccable credibility. In addition, some of these sightings are almost unbelievable. So it is not about content, such as “I’ve got a flashing light seen in the night sky”: You quote fighter pilots the immediate close encounters with these things had to confirm the same time that these objects were impossible maneuvers in the situation and the weapons and communication systems affected. The Belgian Major General Wilfried De Brouwer, for instance, the number of strokes Nahesichtungen “flying triangles” out of his country two decades ago. Jean-Jaquest Velasco discusses his more than twenty years working as head of the French UFO agency.

The author Leslie Kean talks with the Iranian general and former Air Force pilot, Parviz Jafari | Copyright: Bernard Thouanel

You have previously said that they “have separated the wheat from the chaff” – as they so chose, which was included in her book and what is not? Was it important that the cases were supported by a certain amount of evidence or was it primarily intended to identify high-ranking military and government witnesses?

Leslie Kean: Both were important criteria, but there was more. The selection included a combination of many considerations. For this, the physical and aeronautical evidence included in combination with the question of how many credible witnesses of the sighting there, but also the position and rank of the respective authors of each chapter and the presence of credible U.S. government documents on the incidents and present scientific studies or articles of a scientific investigator. In addition, I also wanted to present more recent date possible cases. All cases presented in the book are from the period following the closing of “Project Blue Book”. Also analyzed by official photo, such as the inclusion of an object of the Belgian sightings, is of course a bonus.

Archives: Classic triangular UFO photographed over Belgium in April 1990 | Copyright: AM / G. Mossay

TDG: You have an investigative-journalistic background. Do you think that this fact gives them a special qualification to seek the truth about an interest in the (U.S.) government in UFOs?

Leslie Kean: The facts about a government interest in UFOs are very sound and understandable for everyone. I have both sides of the cover-up question explored in the book, but could find no clear answer. Government insiders are potentially the most qualified source. The only question is whether we can trust them too. But even if these sources do not usually go to the public, making it impossible to bring their information to the public with great effect. But perhaps it is now (from the book) give some government insiders who are willing to engage with the full name of the public. We’ll see what happens.

TDG: Your questioning of internal government sources with “if you can trust them,” is very interesting. Another recent book to date on the UFO issue, titled “Mirage Men” discusses the involvement of intelligence agencies in the propaganda of a “UFO myth”, and thus possibly to cover up secret technology tests by the military. Did they worry that one of their senior contributing witnesses could have told a false story in order to pursue his own goals?

Leslie Kean: No, I did not, or rather, such cases I would have not been included in the book. I doubt it would have the integrity in the sincerity of the “UFO” witnesses to speak next. These men want the same thing as all of us: an answer to the mystery surrounding the question of what these objects are and where they come from.

TDG: I ask because the quality of the witnesses and their statements to sweep any intermediate interpretations aside: Either all these witnesses tell a big lie (or confabulate smaller experiences an incredible way), or it is actually our technology far superior aircraft, as the to contradict laws of physics appear and fly around in our skies. Do you think that there are other options?

Leslie Kean: No, I do not think that there are other options. In addition, I consider the possibility that all the witnesses from “UFO” lie out of the question. So there are no options. There are too many confirmations, in view of the above cases it is not only one to a person who has since seen something and it tells. The U.S. government is lying in their own documentation of cases, for example, in its three-page report on the Iranian incident in 1976? There is also still the option that all cases are somehow explainable, even if they are all different. But I believe that the people Major General De Brouwer, Brigadier-General Pereira (Brazil) and Nick Pope to have everything done to find such explanations, if there had been this. All this happens constantly and throughout the world. My fear is that we stuck with this problem and our remaining options are limited.

TDG: What they believe UFO skeptics will react to your book?

Leslie Kean: I assume that when they speak of “UFO skeptics” so debunker (scouts) think. The hard core of these people will be convinced by anything or anyone can, and I believe that many refuse to read my book at all. (If they read it but, they will get into trouble very nice!) Really unbiased skeptics get through the book, hopefully, something to think about and maybe they are convinced that there is evidence that it is worth it to consider .

TDG: As mentioned earlier, Michio Kaku her book as the “gold standard” for UFO books referred to. Is it a UFO case for them, for it stands out as the “gold standard” of all others, and should be discussed first, if it were up to the validity of UFO research?

Leslie Kean: There are many cases that stand out from the crowd. I would still call for example the case of Rendlesham Forest in 1980, the Belgian UFO wave 1989/90, the UFO sighting by the crew of Japan Airlines, Alaska in 1986 and the fall of the Iranian Air Force in 1976. The main participants in these four cases, all written reports to detailed for my book. But in these cases it is also just about the most famous cases, there are extensive data on what we have been for years and always thoroughly questioned and tested. I am sure that there are a number of similar cases, of which we only know little or nothing, as they are no less outstanding. Imagine the number of events before, were as they happen in all countries around the globe, but only locally documented but never known.

TDG: You were inside the UFO scene with her long-lasting commitment to the publication of the NASA-files to the Kecksburg incident known (… as reported). What they have learned during the experience of this research on the participation of government authorities in investigations of UFO reports?

Leslie Kean: We have learned from this not much more than what we knew before about the role of government in the Kecksburg case. We have learned that the information and details are still classified (a fact which should be after 40 years no longer really), or that they are kept at another location, not where to look for them. Most importantly, however, that the trial has shown in this matter that we had to learn in spite of the law on information sharing (Freedom of Information Act, FOIA), how hard it is to get in under this law covered access to the file, even if this is the right of every citizen actually. Large parts of our history, neither the public nor public researchers and scientific communities. When we had made our first FOIA request in the form of a list of specified content to NASA, we were the answer to our inquiry that there were no documents. But that simply is not true – as it turned out so well put. So it took a formal complaint and proceedings before a federal court, but until then we were transferred hundreds of files, as they had already been so requested in our original request. (A final report on the process and the shared files can be found under “www.freedomofinfo.org”)

TDG: Even before they have repeatedly pointed out that the decision to treat this controversial issue (the release of previously secret UFO documents from the U.S.) are much more cautious and they should not put off by outrageous claims. How can the UFO research achieve this, if most of the serious UFO researchers are drowned out by those authors who seek only publicity?

Leslie Kean: It is indeed a serious problem for which there is no easy solution. Finally, there are no overarching body that decides what is given to the media and what not. It is like the circus with free admission for all. The only solution is to find a way to legitimate the materials are better heard than the frivolous and therefore are perceived by decision-makers as something that stands out from the crowd. Although the decision to give the nonsensical materials no respect – the media is only too happy to rush to make the whole issue ridiculous.

As a journalist who comes from the mainstream media, but also produced news, as it was at about the Kecksburg case and the NASA-charge, I did it personally to my made goal, the most serious and credible information to the public and bring it to not overdo it. Many people have stood by me and advise me in this way. I hope that my book, a summary of my ten years of research on the subject of UFOs, this target will now reach an even larger scale than has been possible so far to me.

TDG has changed their work on the book their opinions about what could be UFO’s?

Leslie Kean: My work has me increasingly strengthened my conviction that UFOs were not a little-known or conventional, man-made can be explained. We must remember to speak, that we only got 5% of all reported sightings … but are within 5% of these are enough well-documented and officially investigated cases, as they demonstrate the existence of unexplained objects without question. Reading eyewitness accounts first hand can cause one a real goose bumps, so powerful is the credibility of the witnesses. Writing the book has forced me to think more deeply about many aspects of the UFO mystery and also reinforced in me the understanding for the urgency, if it comes at last organized by a research initiative to find out what these things. The U.S. government must be involved in this work. We can and we will learn a lot more about UFOs and I think that the mystery may be solved satisfactorily for the world community.

The unidentified flying object was glowing as it moved.  The center of the UFO was white and the outer edges a mustard-yellow.  As he stood for a minute or two, the witness was almost paralyzed by what he was seeing.  He continued his walk home but Dixie came to a halt.

Dixie turned around and growled.  She was showing her teeth and the hair on the back of her head stood up.  Then Dixie let out a vicious and loud bark.  They began running toward the house and the witness never looked back. 

His mother saw that he was out of breath, his mother asked what had happened. She began to believe him as he retold his story.

What was the strange object the witness saw?  What was in the woods that made Dixie bark and growl?

A door opened in the side of the UFO.  Three strange beings floated toward the two men and took them into the object.  Hickson found himself in a brightly-lit room where the aliens examined him for twenty minutes.  Then he was floated out of the UFO back to his boat.

Hickson and Parker called Kessler Air Force Base in Biloxi.  Base authorities told them to report the incident to the local sheriff’s office.  However, the local sheriff dismissed their story as a trick or a hoax.  Both men took lie-detector tests and passed.

The abduction became a big national news item throughout the United States.  However bizarre, their account is one of the best researched alien abduction cases in UFO history.

The fact that the UFO was seen by at least fifteen people and the results of the polygraph tests lend credence to this case.  I believe there is a 60% chance of this being a true alien abduction.

The phenomenon of unknown flying object (Unidentified Flying Object) or UFOs is not a brand new phenomenon. History records dating back hundreds of years ago people had seen UFOs. The journey of Christopher Columbus (1492) to America as an example. Before going to the new world or new world, the Columbus and assistennya, Pedro Guiterrez, see luminous objects in the darkness of night. This issue moves up and down round their ships and then disappeared and reappeared. This incident repeated many times till morning came.

Whether the objects seen by two men with UFO-UFOs that we know today? it should be that the same may not be. however all the objects that have the same designation of Unidentified Flying Objects. All objects unidentified flying all categorized as a UFO. As long as the object identity is not known then it remains classified as a UFO.

Now we look again at the UFO phenomenon. Year 2011 is named as the year most of vision (sighting) UFOs, up sixty seven from last three years. each month there are about 500 visions were reported. of these reports verified whether or not the item is seen it’s very an unknown object or objects are literally known. as an example, air balloons, airplanes, satellites, and meteors strange-shaped clouds are usually considered a UFO however it isn’t. conjointly several reports that it absolutely was a hoax. in any case sorted, solely 5-hitter report really get into the class of UFOs.

Five p.c of 500 cases per month is twenty five cases per month. If you would like to be deepened again, within one month there are solely 5 days while not UFO reports. The rest, a day there’s a sound one-time reports about UFOs. enormous amount to me. Moreover, judging who reported this vision. they’re the ones who are trained and trusted like police, military personnel, pilots (either military or civil aviation), the superintendent of aviation (both civil and military) and those working in the field of shipping (both civilian and military). Such reports are of concern. And making people curious.

Unidentified flying objects are objects that high-tech and controlled. Who makes and management it? the answer is other than mortals who have the same level of intelligence or maybe quite humans. as a result of these creatures don’t seem to be known to man then referred to as the creature (creatures) a far off or alien (s). UFO made and operated, either directly or employing a remote management, by aliens.

Well, UFOs and aliens relationship is similar to aircraft and human relations. Plane, either artificial aliens and humans are the product of a civilization. unfortunately, we tend to do not apprehend where the situation of these aliens civilization. Everything is still in the sort of allegations that are primarily based on the experiences of those who see UFOs (valid report) this.

In science it ought to be like this, primarily based on unfounded reports. however there’s conjointly a guess primarily based on their own interpretations. we tend to already saw in the case of Planet Nibiru and Sitchin, a successful fake anthropologists to be made and famous. Or the allegations are primarily based on the claims of people who claim to be a mediator between the aliens with humans. And there are those that double role, as an anthropologist further as bogus as a mediator.

Lindberg explained to local media that his crew discovered, on the 300-foot-deep ocean floor between Finland and Sweden, “a large circle, about 60 feet in diameter. You see a lot of weird stuff in this job, but during my 18 years as a professional I have never seen anything like this. The shape is completely round.”

Adding to the mystery at the bottom of the Gulf of Bothnia, Lindberg said he saw evidence of scars or marks disturbing the environment nearby, suggesting the object somehow moved across the ocean floor to where his team found it.

It’s not clear what to make of this report, or the video of the sonar scan that shows the object, but Swedish tabloids and Internet UFO buffs have had a field day. Some suggest the object is a flying saucer of extraterrestrial origin (and the seafloor scars were dug up when it crashed), though of all the things that might create a round sonar signature, that seems to be among the more outlandish. It might be a natural feature formation, or possibly a sunken, round human-made object.

Lindberg’s claim that the object “is perfectly round” may or may not be accurate; while it looks round from the information so far, the resolution of the sonar image was not high enough to verify that it is indeed round. And while the lines that appear to be leading to (or from) the feature may suggest some sort of movement, it’s also possible they have nothing to do with the object.
Lindberg himself did not suggest that it was of extraterrestrial origin, though he did speculate that it might be a “new Stonehenge.”

This is not the first time a sunken object has been presented as the solution to a mystery. Take, for example, the famous underwater mystery of the “Bimini Road,” a rock formation in the Caribbean near the Bahamas that resembles a road or wall. Many New Agers and conspiracy theorists claimed that the rocks were too perfectly shaped to be natural, and that they were either made by an unknown civilization or left behind by the lost city of Atlantis. In fact, geologists have identified the blocks as unusually shaped but perfectly natural weathered beach rock.
It’s also worth noting that UFOs may not be saucer-shaped. The famous “flying saucer” description of the first UFO has since been revealed as a reporting error.
Lindberg said his team has neither the interest nor the resources for further investigation of the anomaly. Deep ocean research is time-consuming and expensive. If the object were indeed a flying saucer, recovering it could be worth millions or billions of dollars. If it’s a natural formation, on the other hand, it would probably be a waste of time and money.

The UFO rose and Schirmer noted the time – 3:00AM.  He had been on patrol much longer than ten minutes.

On February 13, 1968, psychologist Dr. Leo Spinkle of the University of Wyoming administered regressive hypnosis on Schirmer.  Under hypnosis, Schirmer remembered that the beings from the ship were friendly.  Dr. Spinkle felt that the patroman “believed in the reality of the events he described.”

Schirmer got back to his duties in Ashland; meanwhile, the Police Chief had resigned.  Schirmer was appointed as new chief.

It is very hard to tell whether Schirmer’s experience was real or imaginary.  There were no witnesses or lie detector tests.  However, there was his testimony while under regressive hypnosis, therefore, I give this case a 50% chance of being extraterrestrial.

Latest UFO Sightings at Planet Mercury

Aka Alien Flying Article UFO has consistently been an absorbing actual to apprehend and follow. Although there is agitation about the pros and cons coachman actuality beings who are declared as green-skinned and arrogant wide-eyed, but still account about aliens is consistently absorbing to read.

Latest UFO Sightings UFO Sighting alias Newest actual fun listened to, already afresh behindhand of the pros and cons of absolute account or just a hoax. Well, for those of you who are curious, there’s the latest account of UFO sightings that occurred recently.

The bogeyman of this alien article is estimated to action accidentally if one of one of NASA’s solar anchor was celebratory chaplet accumulation casting or solar storms that hit the average of the planet Mercury on December 1, 2011 ago. If a big beachcomber of solar storms hit the planet abutting to the antecedent of the solar ablaze is al of a sudden apparent a annular article that addled the beachcomber and burning. Shaped article was actual large, some accept that it is a UFO mother address that was celebratory solar activity. But not a few who say that the article was an astroid that was absolutely not be there or a comet that was dead.

Youtube video is apparent was fabricated by anyone from a U.S. Navy website SECCHI. Intrigued wish to see the video? Just attending below.

Again I say this aback to you that you accept it or not, it’s aback to yourself. Latest UFO Sightings video hopefully is absorbing to agenda and debated ^ _ ^

In the very first weeks of the new year has been a major increase in reported UFO sightings around the world. On the Internet swarmed with new UFO video. 

Ufologové around the world agree that it is a full eruption of UFO videos. The U.S. private initiative MUFON during January 2012 recorded more than 200 UFO sightings from almost all over the U.S.. It’s more than double the previous year. Informed about its director of Colorado businessman Clifford W. Clift. Similarly, it was in different parts of the world.

Scotland, 1st January 2012: In the fog quickly flew over the road two lights. Noticed the camera is a mountain located in the car service.

Mexico, Sinaola, 3 January 2012: Two fiery objects flying down to the ground at an angle above the local hill. According to NASA meteors. According to witness the meteors certainly were not, and flew too slowly rotated. Have you ever seen a falling meteors? It’s just a twinkle and disappear. Mexican lights flying slowly and long. If it were large meteors would probably fall apart very quickly. Comments below the video: Charles saw the beginning of a similar orange light in Connecticut and there stopped in flight. Another comment: they are alien ships, pursuing our transformation in 2012.

Brazil, Campinas, 3 January 2012: Set about 15-20 UFO flying slowly, white lights, some flashing. This is a very good film footage. Formation is gradually changing, sometimes reminds floating variable star sign, the color changes from green to red. Ufologové the world marvel. Some see it as that any object deleted more small lights – orbs. Aliens in this case are playful and aesthetic foundation.

Mexico, Tijuana, 6 January 2012: Two glowing spherical objects, one is obvious.

In 1989 a Nevada television station ran an interesting interview featuring a man named Bob Lazar.  Lazar claimed to have worked as a physicist at a location known as S-4, a top-secret U.S. Government location attached to the infamous Area 51 at Groom Lake, Nevada.  There, Lazar claims to have seen, worked on, and witnessed the operation of up to nine bizarre flying craft.  He first believed them to be super-secret military experiments, but soon realized they were something else.  Bob Lazar says they were flying saucers, some authentic, and some versions of alien spacecraft built by the U.S. Military and reverse engineered from captured UFOs.

Lazar went on to explain the advanced science of the propulsion systems employed by these vehicles, and described the elements required to create the reaction which gives them their power and antigravity abilities.  He even claimed to have undergone briefings where the alien origins of the crafts and their creators were explained in detail.

The Credibility of Bob Lazar

Understandably, the UFO community went bonkers following Lazar’s interview.  After all, everyone knows something strange is going on at Area 51, and now there’s proof from someone who worked there.  But others soon began to poke holes in Lazar’s story. 

He claimed to have degrees from MIT and California Institute of Technology, but these schools apparently have no record of him.  Lazar can provide no evidence that he ever attended, or that he holds an advanced degree in physics or science from any institution.  Likewise, he can provide no credible proof of his employment at S-4.  Further claims are that he has a past criminal record, has declared bankruptcy in the past, and once operated a brothel. 

But Lazar has his supporters.  One man, John Lear, stated publicly that he and Lazar had visited areas of Groom Lake together, and were allowed access because of his top-secret clearance.  George Knapp, the reporter who broke the original story, has stated that he was impressed with how Lazar’s knowledge of life at the facility matched up with stories from others known to have worked at Area 51.

Many of Lazar supporters have alleged that the government has tampered with Lazar’s records in an effort to discredit him.

Is Bob Lazar a diversion planted by the government?

One interesting theory says Bob Lazar is an agent of the U.S. Government, working in conjunction with them to spread misinformation about Area 51.  The information presented by Lazar, and the efforts made to discredit him that followed, distract the public from what may really be going on at Area 51.  This is conspiracy theory at its finest, but it does seem as plausible as any other aspect of the story.

The Truth about Bob Lazar:     

Did Bob Lazar really work as a top-secret physicist and research scientist, reverse-engineering alien spacecraft at the most clandestine test facility in the world?  Is Bob Lazar a believable goofball who was just looking for attention?  Is Bob Lazar a covert agent of the government, intentionally spreading misinformation to distract the public from the real work going on at Area 51? 

What do you think?

Thanks for reading!  If you enjoyed this article please LIKE it on Facebook using the thumbs-up button below!

More fun stuff from MJ:

Sightings of Orang Pendek:  Evidence of an Undiscovered Human Species?

The Shadow People of Waverly Hills Sanatorium

Megalodon!  Does a Shark Three Times the Size of Great White Still Stalk the World’s Oceans?

Hollow Earth Theory:  Could Another World Exist Deep Inside Our Planet?

The Philadelphia Experiment:  How the U.S. Navy Accidentally Teleported a Warship