You are here: Home » History » Imperial Capitalism: The Hobson-Lenin Thesis

Imperial Capitalism: The Hobson-Lenin Thesis

John Atkinson Hobson and Vladimir Lenin wrote on how the Imperialist Capitalist system developed in the West in the late nineteenth century. It was this new Imperial Capitalism that allowed monopolies to form and caused the endless need for new markets, inevitably leading to war.

John Atkinson Hobson and Vladimir Lenin both claimed that the West live by a system of Capitalist Imperialism, a system that fosters powerful monopolies over free trade and inevitably leads to war.  Both Hobson and Lenin claimed that as monopolies in both the industrial and the financial sectors of society formed in the second half of the nineteenth century, imperialistic policies were needed to protect their financial interests and Western governments were more than willing to do this, as their economies depended on these monopolies.  As many industrialists and financiers stand to make considerable gains from war, Hobson and Lenin argued that they actively encourage conflicts such as World War One. 

Vladimir Lenin.  Image source

In his essay, Imperialism, the Highest Stage of Capitalism, first published in 1916, Vladimir Lenin claimed that the most important aspect of the Capitalist economy from c1870 was the transformation from an environment of competition to a situation where monopolies had formed.  Often, cartels and trusts controlled seven or eight tenths of all the output of a given industry and as these cartels merged or had understandings and agreements with each other on issues such as product prices.  Free trade was lost and a small number of capitalists gained large amounts of power and took control of key aspects of society such as skilled labour and transport.

John Atkinson Hobson, a widely popular English economist and Imperial critic, wrote in his work, Imperialism, A Study, first published in 1902, “of a small minority of white men, officials, traders, and industrial organisers, exercising political and economic sway over great hoards of population regarded as inferior and as incapable of exercising any considerable rights of self government, in politics or industry”.

One of the most important features of the transformation of Capitalism into Imperialist Capitalism was the changing role of the banks, which went from being what Lenin called  “small, numerous modest intermediaries” into powerful monopolies controlling vast amounts of capital.  For example by 1909, eighty three per cent of total German bank capital was controlled by the nine big Berlin banks (along with smaller affiliated banks that these banks had shares or holdings in).  As the banks gained more power, industry became more dependent on them and banks, industry and commercial enterprises became more tied to one another. 

12
Liked it
User Comments
  1. Chuck

    On August 18, 2009 at 1:29 am


    And as time went on, Lenin’s experiment in socialism/communism collapsed under it’s own weight without a shot being fired, after nearly everyone in the USSR lived a pitiful poor, pointless existence.

    The US and most capitalist societies went on to prosper on heights never before seen in the history of the Earth. Including a new middle class who by most previous standards were un-believably rich and comfortable.

    And now China is awakening after years of communist oppression by introducing capitalism.

    Amazing how two seemingly bright guys can so mis-interpret their own research.

    And oh, by the way, compare the USSR’s record on waging war during the twenty century with any body else. There occupation of neighboring countries, 60 million killed by Stalin, the total wreck they left the whole of easteren Europe in. One only needs to compare the two Germany’s after WWII to see which flourished.

    Interesting research.

  2. Chris Stonecipher

    On August 18, 2009 at 2:25 am


    Your article is well research and informative. I enjoyed reading your article. I felt I have learned something new. Thanks for sharing.

  3. Auron Renius

    On August 20, 2009 at 10:34 am


    Hi Chuck.

    I think you are kind of missing the point here, the article, and the Hobson/Lenin theses deal with the specific question, ‘does imperialist capitalism lead to war’. The fact that communism largely failed as a system and also lead to war is true, but irrelevant here.

    As far as westerners living in the lap of luxury goes, that’s true also, but you have to realize that it’s at the expense of countless millions who suffer in various ways as a result of our affluence, especially in South America and Africa. However this is also beside the point, but the best place to learn about this is one the website of one of the most respected academic social commentators of our time, Noam Chomsky. http://www.chomsky.info/

    The wars waged in the 20th and 21st century by capitalist countries especially America have been largely inevitable under the current system for the reasons stated above and waged for a few powerful men to make profit.

    You only have to look at Iraq an Afghanistan to see this. If you ‘follow the money’, you will see that those involved in the decision to take us to was and their associates are getting richer by the day from these conflicts. If you think those wars are being waged to protect our freedoms, then you have to wonder why we have gained no new freedoms since they began, none of the existing ones have been enhanced and we seem to be actually loosing our liberties increasingly.

  4. MMV Abad

    On August 31, 2009 at 12:56 am


    Interesting article. Informative and well told. Thanks :)

  5. Darla Cooke

    On November 30, 2009 at 10:18 am


    Very interesting and informative article. Thanks for sharing.

Post Comment
Powered by Powered by Triond